Axis Formation in Amphibians_ The Pheno

.pdf

School

Johns Hopkins University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

020.363

Subject

Biology

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

Uploaded by DeanNeutronHedgehog15

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Gilbert SF. Developmental Biology. 6th edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2000. Axis Formation in Amphibians: The Phenomenon of the Organizer The Progressive Determination of the Amphibian Axes Vertebrate axes do not form from localized determinants in the various blastomeres, as in Drosophila. Rather, they arise progressively through a sequence of interactions between neighboring cells. Amphibian axis formation is an example of regulative development. In Chapter 3, we discussed the concept of regulative development, wherein (1) an isolated blastomere has a potency greater than its normal embryonic fate, and (2) a cell's fate is determined by interactions between neighboring cells. Such interactions are called inductions (see Chapter 6). That such inductive interactions were responsible for amphibian axis determination was demonstrated by the laboratory of Hans Spemann at the University of Freiburg. The experiments of Spemann and his students framed the questions that experimental embryologists asked for most of the twentieth century, and they resulted in a Nobel Prize for Spemann in 1935. More recently, the discoveries of the molecules associated with these inductive processes have provided some of the most exciting moments in contemporary science. The experiment that began this research program was performed in 1903, when Spemann demonstrated that early newt blastomeres have identical nuclei, each capable of producing an entire larva. His procedure was ingenious: Shortly after fertilizing a newt egg, Spemann used a baby's hair taken from his daughter to lasso the zygote in the plane of the first cleavage. He then partially constricted the egg, causing all the nuclear divisions to remain on one side of the constriction. Eventually, often as late as the 16-cell stage, a nucleus would escape across the constriction into the non-nucleated side. Cleavage then began on this side, too, whereupon Spemann tightened the lasso until the two halves were completely separated. Twin larvae developed, one slightly older than the other ( Figure 10.17). Spemann concluded from this experiment that early amphibian nuclei were genetically identical and that each cell was capable of giving rise to an entire organism. Figure 10.17 Spemann's demonstration of nuclear equivalence in newt cleavage. (A) When the fertilized egg of the newt Triturus taeniatus was constricted by a ligature, the nucleus was restricted to one-half of the embryo. The cleavage on that side of the embryo reached (more...) However, when Spemann performed a similar experiment with the constriction still longitudinal, but perpendicular to the plane of the first cleavage (separating the future dorsal and ventral regions rather than the right and left sides), he obtained a different result altogether. The nuclei continued to divide on both sides of the constriction, but only one side—the future dorsal side of the embryo—gave rise to a normal larva. The other side produced an unorganized tissue mass of ventral cells, which Spemann called the Bauchstück —the belly piece. This tissue mass was a ball of epidermal cells (ectoderm) containing blood and mesenchyme (mesoderm) and gut cells (endoderm), but no dorsal structures such as nervous system, notochord, or somites ( Figure 10.18). Figure 10.18

Asymmetry in the amphibian egg. (A) When the egg is divided along the plane of first cleavage into two blastomeres, each of which gets one-half of the gray crescent, each experimentally separated cell develops into a normal embryo. (B) When only one of (more...) Why should these two experiments give different results? One possibility was that when the egg was divided perpendicular to the first cleavage plane, some cytoplasmic substance was not equally distributed into the two halves. Fortunately, the salamander egg was a good place to test that hypothesis. As we have seen in Chapter 7 and above, there are dramatic movements in the cytoplasm following the fertilization of amphibian eggs, and in some amphibians these movements expose a gray, crescent-shaped area of cytoplasm in the region directly opposite the point of sperm entry. This area has been called the gray crescent. Moreover, the first cleavage plane normally splits the gray crescent equally into the two blastomeres. If these cells are then separated, two complete larvae develop. However, should this cleavage plane be aberrant (either in the rare natural event or in an experiment), the gray crescent material passes into only one of the two blastomeres. Spemann found that when these two blastomeres are separated, only the blastomere containing the gray crescent develops normally. WEBSITE 10.3 Embryology and individuality. One egg usually makes only one adult. However, there are exceptions to this rule, and Spemann was drawn into embryology through the paradoxes of creating more than one individual from a single egg. http://www.devbio.com/chap10/link1003.shtml It appeared, then, that something in the gray crescent region was essential for proper embryonic development. But how did it function? What role did it play in normal development? The most important clue came from the fate map of this area of the egg, for it showed that the gray crescent region gives rise to the cells that initiate gastrulation. These cells form the dorsal lip of the blastopore. The cells of the dorsal lip are committed to invaginate into the blastula, thus initiating gastrulation and the formation of the notochord. Because all future amphibian development depends on the interaction of cells rearranged during gastrulation, Spemann speculated that the importance of the gray crescent material lies in its ability to initiate gastrulation, and that crucial developmental changes occur during gastrulation. In 1918, Spemann demonstrated that enormous changes in cell potency do indeed take place during gastrulation. He found that the cells of the early gastrula were uncommitted, but that the fates of late gastrula cells were determined. Spemann demonstrated this by exchanging tissues between the gastrulae of two species of newts whose embryos were differently pigmented ( Figure 10.19). When a region of prospective epidermal cells from an early gastrula was transplanted into an area in another early gastrula where the neural tissue normally formed, the transplanted cells gave rise to neural tissue. When prospective neural tissue from early gastrulae was transplanted to the region fated to become belly skin, the neural tissue became epidermal ( Table 10.1). Thus, these early newt gastrula cells were not yet committed to a specific fate. Such cells are said to exhibit conditional (i.e., regulative or dependent) development because their ultimate fates depend on their location in the embryo. However, when the same interspecies transplantation experiments were performed on late gastrulae, Spemann

obtained completely different results. Rather than differentiating in accordance with their new location, the transplanted cells exhibited autonomous (or independent, or mosaic) development . Their prospective fate was determined, and the cells developed independently of their new embryonic location. Specifically, prospective neural cells now developed into brain tissue even when placed in the region of prospective epidermis, and prospective epidermis formed skin even in the region of the prospective neural tube. Within the time separating early and late gastrulation, the potencies of these groups of cells had become restricted to their eventual paths of differentiation. Something was causing them to become determined to epidermal and neural fates. What was happening? Figure 10.19 Determination of ectoderm during newt gastrulation. Presumptive neural ectoderm from one newt embryo is transplanted into a region in another embryo that normally becomes epidermis. (A) When the tissues are transferred between early gastrulas, the presumptive (more...) Table 10.1 Results of tissue transplantation during early- and late-gastrula stages in the newt. Hans Spemann and Hilde Mangold: Primary Embryonic Induction The most spectacular transplantation experiments were published by Hans Spemann and Hilde Mangold in 1924. They showed that, of all the tissues in the early gastrula, only one has its fate determined. This self-differentiating tissue is the dorsal lip of the blastopore, the tissue derived from the gray crescent cytoplasm. When this dorsal lip tissue was transplanted into the presumptive belly skin region of another gastrula, it not only continued to be blastopore lip, but also initiated gastrulation and embryogenesis in the surrounding tissue ( Figure 10.20). Two conjoined embryos were formed instead of one! Figure 10.20 Organization of a secondary axis by dorsal blastopore lip tissue. (A) Dorsal lip tissue from an early gastrula is transplanted into another early gastrula in the region that normally becomes ventral epidermis. (B) The donor tissue invaginates and forms (more...) In these experiments, Spemann and Mangold used differently pigmented embryos from two newt species: the darkly pigmented Triturus taeniatus and the nonpigmented Triturus cristatus. So when Spemann and Mangold prepared these transplants, they were able to readily identify host and donor tissues on the basis of color. When the dorsal lip of an early T. taeniatus gastrula was removed and implanted into the region of an early T. cristatus gastrula fated to become ventral epidermis (belly skin), the dorsal lip tissue invaginated just as it would normally have done (showing self- determination), and disappeared beneath the vegetal cells. The pigmented donor tissue then continued to self-differentiate into the chordamesoderm (notochord) and other mesodermal structures that normally form from the dorsal lip. As the new donor-derived mesodermal cells moved forward, host cells began to participate in the production of the new embryo, becoming organs that normally they * †

never would have formed. In this secondary embryo, a somite could be seen containing both pigmented (donor) and unpigmented (host) tissue. Even more spectacularly, the dorsal lip cells were able to interact with the host tissues to form a complete neural plate from host ectoderm. Eventually, a secondary embryo formed, face to face with its host. These technically difficult experiments have been repeated using nuclear markers, and the results of Spemann and Mangold have been confirmed ( Smith and Slack 1983; Recanzone and Harris 1985). WEBSITE 10.4 Spemann, Mangold, and the organizer. Spemann did not see the importance of this work the first time they did it. This website provides a more detailed account of why Spemann and Mangold did this experiment. http://www.devbio.com/chap10/link1004.shtml Spemann (1938) referred to the dorsal lip cells and their derivatives (notochord, prechordal mesoderm) as the organizer because (1) they induced the host's ventral tissues to change their fates to form a neural tube and dorsal mesodermal tissue (such as somites), and (2) they organized host and donor tissues into a secondary embryo with clear anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes. He proposed that during normal development, these cells organize the dorsal ectoderm into a neural tube and transform the flanking mesoderm into the anterior-posterior body axis. It is now known (thanks largely to Spemann and his students) that the interaction of the chordamesoderm and ectoderm is not sufficient to “organize” the entire embryo. Rather, it initiates a series of sequential inductive events. As discussed in Chapter 6, the process by which one embryonic region interacts with a second region to influence that second region's differentiation or behavior is called induction. Because there are numerous inductions during embryonic development, this key induction wherein the progeny of dorsal lip cells induce the dorsal axis and the neural tube is traditionally called primary embryonic induction . The Mechanisms of Axis Formation in Amphibians The experiments of Spemann and Mangold showed that the dorsal lip of the blastopore, and the notochord that forms from it, constituted an “organizer” that could instruct the formation of new embryonic axes. But the mechanisms by which the organizer was constructed and through which it operated were totally unknown. Indeed, it is said that Spemann and Mangold's paper posed more questions than it answered. Among these questions were: How did the organizer get its properties? What caused the dorsal blastopore lip to differ from any other region of the embryo? What factors were being secreted from the organizer to cause the formation of the neural tube and to create the anterior-posterior, dorsal-ventral, and left-right axes? How did the different parts of the neural tube become established, with the most anterior becoming the sensory organs and forebrain, and the most posterior becoming spinal cord? We will take up each of these questions in turn. The origin of the Nieuwkoop center The major clue in determining how the dorsal blastopore lip obtained its properties came from the experiments of Pieter Nieuwkoop (1969, 1973, 1977). He and his colleagues in the Netherlands ‡

demonstrated that the properties of this newly formed mesoderm were induced by the vegetal (presumptive endoderm) cells underlying them. He removed the equatorial cells (i.e., presumptive mesoderm) from a blastula and showed that neither the animal cap (presumptive ectoderm) nor the vegetal cap (presumptive endoderm) produced any mesodermal tissue. However, when the two caps were recombined, the animal cap cells were induced to form mesodermal structures such as notochord, muscles, kidney cells, and blood cells ( Figure 10.21). The polarity of this induction (whether the animal cells formed dorsal mesoderm or ventral mesoderm) depended on the dorsal-ventral polarity of the endodermal (vegetal) fragment. While the ventral and lateral vegetal cells (those closer to the side of sperm entry) induced ventral (mesenchyme, blood) and intermediate (muscle, kidney) mesoderm, the dorsalmost vegetal cells specified dorsal mesoderm components (somites, notochord), including those having the properties of the organizer. The dorsalmost vegetal cells of the blastula, which are capable of inducing the organizer, have been called the Nieuwkoop center ( Gerhart et al. 1989). Figure 10.21 Summary of experiments by Nieuwkoop and by Nakamura and Takasaki (1970), showing mesodermal induction by vegetal endoderm. (A) Isolated animal cap cells become a mass of ciliated epidermis, isolated vegetal cells generate gutlike tissue, and isolated (more...) The Nieuwkoop center was demonstrated in the 32-cell Xenopus embryo by transplantation and recombination experiments. First, Gimlich and Gerhart ( Gimlich and Gerhart 1984; Gimlich 1985, 1986) performed an experiment analogous to the Spemann and Mangold studies, except that they used blastulae rather than gastrulae. When they transplanted the dorsalmost vegetal blastomere from one blastula into the ventral vegetal side of another blastula, two embryonic axes were formed (see Figure 10.11B). Second, Dale and Slack (1987) recombined single vegetal blastomeres from a 32-cell Xenopus embryo with the uppermost animal tier of a fluorescently labeled embryo of the same stage. The dorsalmost vegetal cell, as expected, induced the animal pole cells to become dorsal mesoderm. The remaining vegetal cells usually induced the animal cells to produce either intermediate or ventral mesodermal tissues ( Figure 10.22). Thus, dorsal vegetal cells can induce animal cells to become dorsal mesodermal tissue. Figure 10.22 The regional specificity of mesoderm induction can be demonstrated by recombining cells of 32-cell Xenopus embryos. Animal pole cells were labeled with fluorescent polymers so that their descendants could be identified, then combined with individual vegetal (more...) The Nieuwkoop center is created by the cytoplasmic rotation that occurs during fertilization (see Chapter 7). When this rotation is inhibited by UV light, the resulting embryo will not form dorsal- anterior structures such as the head or neural tube ( Vincent and Gerhart 1987). However, these UV- treated embryos can be rescued by transplantation of the dorsalmost vegetal blastomeres from a normal embryo at the 32-cell stage ( Dale and Slack 1987; see Figure 10.11A). If eggs are rotated toward the end of the first cell cycle so that the future ventral side is upward, two Nieuwkoop centers are formed,

leading to two dorsal blastopore lips and two embryonic axes (see Figure 10.10). Therefore, the specification of the dorsal-ventral axis begins at the moment of sperm entry. The molecular biology of the Nieuwkoop center In Xenopus , the endoderm is able to induce the formation of mesoderm by causing the presumptive mesodermal cells to express the Xenopus Brachyury ( Xbra ) gene. The mechanism of this induction is not well understood (see Harland and Gerhart 1997), but the Xbra protein is a transcription factor that activates the genes that produce mesoderm-specific proteins. While all the vegetal cells appear to be able to induce the overlying marginal cells to become mesoderm, only the dorsalmost vegetal cells can instruct the overlying dorsal marginal cells to become the organizer. The major candidate for the factor that forms the Nieuwkoop center in these dorsalmost vegetal cells is β-catenin. WEBSITE 10.5 Mesoderm induction. There are numerous theories concerning how the generic mesoderm is induced by the endoderm. Evidence points to three molecules as possible mesoderm inducers: bFGF, Vg1, and an activin-like protein. These proteins can activate Xbra as well as other mesodermal proteins. http://www.devbio.com/chap10/link1005.shtml β-catenin is a multifunctional protein that can act as an anchor for cell membrane cadherins (see Chapter 3) or as a nuclear transcription factor (see Chapter 6). In Xenopus embryos, β-catenin begins to accumulate in the dorsal region of the egg during the cytoplasmic movements of fertilization. β-catenin continues to accumulate preferentially at the dorsal side throughout early cleavage, and this accumulation is seen in the nuclei of the dorsal cells ( Figure 10.23A- D; Schneider et al. 1996; Larabell et al. 1997). This region of β-catenin accumulation originally appears to cover both the Nieuwkoop center and organizer regions. During later cleavage, the cells containing β-catenin may reside specifically in the Nieuwkoop center ( Heasman et al. 1994a; Guger and Gumbiner 1995). Figure 10.23 The role of Wnt pathway proteins in dorsal-ventral axis specification. (A-D) Differential translocation of β-catenin into Xenopus blastomere nuclei. (A) Early 2-cell stage of Xenopus , showing β-catenin (orange) predominantly at the dorsal (more...) β-catenin is necessary for forming the dorsal axis, since experimental depletion of β-catenin transcripts with antisense oligonucleotides results in the lack of dorsal structures ( Heasman et al. 1994a). Moreover, the injection of exogenous β-catenin into the ventral side of the embryo produces a secondary axis ( Funayama et al. 1995; Guger and Gumbiner 1995). β-catenin is part of the Wnt signal transduction pathway and is negatively regulated by the glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3; see Chapter 6). GSK-3 also plays a critical role in axis formation by suppressing dorsal fates. Activated GSK-3 blocks axis formation when added to the egg ( Pierce and Kimelman 1995; He et al. 1995; Yost et al. 1996). If endogenous GSK-3 is knocked out by a dominant negative protein in the ventral cells of the early embryo, a second axis forms ( Figure 10.23E). So how can β-catenin become localized to the future dorsal cells of the blastula? Labeling experiments ( Yost et al. 1996; Larabell et al. 1997) suggest that β-catenin is initially synthesized (from maternal

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version