HIS - UNIT II STUDY GUIDE
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Columbia Southern University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1301
Subject
History
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
Pages
6
Uploaded by ConstableChinchillaPerson912
HIS 1303, United States Military History I
1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit II
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
3.
Discuss the innovations and new technologies that directly affected the U.S. military.
3.1
Identify notable innovations and tactics of the Continental Army and militia.
5.
Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. military during major military encounters.
5.1
Identify major figures and groups associated with colonial military operations.
5.2
Indicate the challenges the colonial military and militia encountered during the American
Revolution.
6.
Summarize the experiences of enlisted colonial or U.S. soldiers during war and peace.
6.1
Relate what a soldier experienced during the American Revolution.
Required Unit Resources
Chapter 3:
The American Revolution, 1763
–
1783
In order to access the following resources, click the links below.
George Washington is considered a great example of leadership. In this article, the author explains how that
leadership was tested and exemplified during the early years of 1776 and 1777. The article looks at the
characteristics of Washington, and the development of the Continental Army.
Shy, J., & Vandervort, B. (2005).
The road to Valley Forge: How Washington built the army that won the
revolution
.
Journal of Military History
,
69
(2), 549
–
551.
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=31h&AN=16552562&site=ehost-live&scope=site
The Southern campaign during the American Revolution was a story of disastrous losses followed by
unexpected gains. The architect of the eventual success of the Continental Army in the South was Major
General Nathanael Greene. This article explores the challenges that Greene faced and the strategies and
tactics he used to overcome the significant obstacles in his way.
Muller, J. (2019).
The road to Charleston: Nathanael Greene and the American Revolution
.
Library Journal,
144
(2), 132.
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire
ct=true&db=e000xna&AN=2358372&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Unit Lesson
The repercussions of the Great War for Empire created the seeds of rebellion within the colonies. Colonists
began rebelling through a refusal to follow English ordinances, propaganda, and (more drastically) through
violence as the Sons of Liberty and its actions amply illustrate. As colonial resistance grew,
England’s actions
toward the colonies were too little, too late as the colonists were relatively self-governing prior to the
resistance.
Colonists objected to England
’s new legislative interest in the colo
nies (i.e., the Navigation Acts). Colonists
also objected to England
’s attempts to collect mon
ey from the colonies. These taxes and tariffs went hand-in-
hand with England
’s legislative acts. Ultimately,
England felt that the colonies owed obedience and monies for
UNIT II STUDY GUIDE
The American Revolution, 1763-1783
HIS 1303, United States Military History I
2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
the protections the island nation was providing to its colonies. The colonists, however, were perturbed by the
British attempts to deal with Native American tribes. In October 1763, the British established the Proclamation
Line that closed the area beyond the Appalachians to colonists. The British felt this would provide a measure
of protection to the colonists as well as eliminate the costly Indian wars funded
by the crown’s coffers.
However, the British did not factor in the colonists’ lust for la
nd, and thus, rather than providing the colonists
with a sense of protection, it incensed them through land limitations by proclamation (Millett et al., 2012).
As the lines were drawn for both sides, the Continental Army (America’s first standing army), w
as organized
and commanded by George Washington despite Congress’s fear of such a military presence. Congress’ own
monetary difficulties and inability to enforce its policies further complicated the American position. The spirit of
independence that led to the American Revolution also proved to be a deterrent in successfully waging war
(Millett et al., 2012). To viably wage such a war, cooperation was needed; throughout the conflict, this
cooperation was always fragile and often nonexistent.
Initially, the colonists sought to rectify the strained relationship with the mother country and claimed to be
acting only in a mode of self-defense. However, there were issues that began to change this initial colonial
outlook. First, the position of the British continued to incense rather than soothe colonial egos. The British
appeared determined to reign in the colonies and lacked any desire to address
—
much less compromise on
—
the issues with which the colonists challenged the mother country. Furthermore, to slay the giant (England),
the colonies would need help with numbers, resources, and, especially, finances. To obtain this help from
foreign powers like France, Spain, and the Netherlands, they needed to emphasize the severed bonds with
England rather than repair the relationship.
The role of the standing army was supplemented by the role
of the militia and is thoroughly explained in this unit.
Besides birthing
America’s first
standing army, the
revolution led to other technological developments. Britain
had long been a naval powerhouse, and the patriots (a term
claimed by the rebelling colonists) doubted the ability to
overcome such force directly. However, even if the patriots
could not end the conflict through the might of a navy, they
did realize that such might, regardless of how small, could
be used to weaken the British position. Thus, prior to the
end of the war, the Americans had a total of four navies
—
each with specific objectives and purposes
—
as well as
naval support from another colonial power, France. During
this period, a development emerged that would change the
history of warfare forever: the turtle submarine (Millett et al.,
2012).
The war impacted all segments of colonial society. Native
Americans played a big role in the unfolding dispute.
Initially, both sides encouraged the Native Americans to
remain neutral; however, as the war continued to wage,
they chose increasing involvement. For the first time since
the institution of their confederation, the Iroquois fought
each other, the Oneida and Tuscarora tribes standing with
the patriots, while the others, following the lead of the
powerful Mohawks fought for the British. More Native
Americans did ally themselves with the British, ironically, for
the same reason that the patriots began the war: freedom. It
was obvious that while the British might have been unable
or, perhaps, even unwilling to enforce the Proclamation Line
of 1763 that temporarily closed the area west of the
Appalachians to white settlement to appease the Native
American fears of illegal land purchases and encroachments
by land speculators, fur traders, and frontiersmen, they did
not harbor the same lust for land as the colonists. The British used the excuse of the necessity of enforcing
the proclamation as one of their reasons to maintain a standing army in the colonies. The standing army and
A cutaway depiction of David Bushnell’s
Turtle
(Bushnell, 1916)
HIS 1303, United States Military History I
3
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
the continued taxation of the colonies stirred up continued resentment and a stronger desire for self-rule and
independence from England (Millett et al., 2012).
Washington proved to be an excellent choice of
commander for the Continental Army. As a Virginian, he
provided a colonial feel and worked tirelessly to create an
army that would serve as a symbol
—
the very backbone
—
of
colonial resistance. Given it was such a potent symbol, this
army was to be protected at all costs, and Washington was
ready to employ techniques of warfare utilized and adapted
during frontier campaigns that the structured British had not
previously encountered. Another reason Washington was
such a commendable choice was his previous background
as a politician. Unlike many military leaders, both prior to
and following him, Washington realized the importance of
respecting the limitations placed on him by the government,
though this did not mean he did not challenge the fledgling
government as with his secretary. This was evident by the
many letters written by Alexander Hamilton, Wash
ington’s
subordinate officer, requesting support and arguing for the
needs of his forces. Washington understood the fear of a
standing army among his countrymen and did not place
demands or orders upon the government, though this often
led to the privation of the very troops he held so dear
(Millett et al., 2012).
As a figurehead of the resistance and undoubtedly a
major player in the war, Washington was not alone in
winning the war. Many other men contributed a great
deal. A notable example is Benedict Arnold. In the
early stages of the conflict, Arnold was a patriot
leader who displayed a strong sense of duty and
passion for the cause. Among his most significant
accolades was the leadership that he demonstrated
in his advance through the Maine wilderness and the
capture of Quebec. However, as the war progressed,
for endlessly debatable reasons (including pressure
from his wife), Arnold famously changed his
allegiance to the British. His position provided him
unique advantages that were attractive to the
English, and this switch in loyalties made his name
synonymous with treason and treachery. Another
patriot leader who contributed a great deal to the
realization of an independent America, though he is
sometimes overlooked, was Nathanael Greene.
Spending much of the conflict as an assistant to
Washington, he could not pinpoint any one specific
colonial victory as his own, but the results of his
leadership during the Southern campaign did much
to further the cause.
Many factors played into the eventual colonial win. Washington and the pride he instilled in the new nation
was clearly one such reason. Another was the courage and determination that the patriots displayed.
Certainly, desertion influenced their performance, but the average soldier clung to his new nation willingly and
served loyally with a sense of duty from God. Additionally, these men served at home, protecting their land
American Revolutionary War General Benedict Arnold
(Hart, 1776)
General George Washington
(King, 18th century)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help