HIS - UNIT II STUDY GUIDE

.pdf

School

Columbia Southern University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1301

Subject

History

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

6

Uploaded by ConstableChinchillaPerson912

Report
HIS 1303, United States Military History I 1 Course Learning Outcomes for Unit II Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to: 3. Discuss the innovations and new technologies that directly affected the U.S. military. 3.1 Identify notable innovations and tactics of the Continental Army and militia. 5. Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. military during major military encounters. 5.1 Identify major figures and groups associated with colonial military operations. 5.2 Indicate the challenges the colonial military and militia encountered during the American Revolution. 6. Summarize the experiences of enlisted colonial or U.S. soldiers during war and peace. 6.1 Relate what a soldier experienced during the American Revolution. Required Unit Resources Chapter 3: The American Revolution, 1763 1783 In order to access the following resources, click the links below. George Washington is considered a great example of leadership. In this article, the author explains how that leadership was tested and exemplified during the early years of 1776 and 1777. The article looks at the characteristics of Washington, and the development of the Continental Army. Shy, J., & Vandervort, B. (2005). The road to Valley Forge: How Washington built the army that won the revolution . Journal of Military History , 69 (2), 549 551. https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc t=true&db=31h&AN=16552562&site=ehost-live&scope=site The Southern campaign during the American Revolution was a story of disastrous losses followed by unexpected gains. The architect of the eventual success of the Continental Army in the South was Major General Nathanael Greene. This article explores the challenges that Greene faced and the strategies and tactics he used to overcome the significant obstacles in his way. Muller, J. (2019). The road to Charleston: Nathanael Greene and the American Revolution . Library Journal, 144 (2), 132. https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire ct=true&db=e000xna&AN=2358372&site=ehost-live&scope=site Unit Lesson The repercussions of the Great War for Empire created the seeds of rebellion within the colonies. Colonists began rebelling through a refusal to follow English ordinances, propaganda, and (more drastically) through violence as the Sons of Liberty and its actions amply illustrate. As colonial resistance grew, England’s actions toward the colonies were too little, too late as the colonists were relatively self-governing prior to the resistance. Colonists objected to England ’s new legislative interest in the colo nies (i.e., the Navigation Acts). Colonists also objected to England ’s attempts to collect mon ey from the colonies. These taxes and tariffs went hand-in- hand with England ’s legislative acts. Ultimately, England felt that the colonies owed obedience and monies for UNIT II STUDY GUIDE The American Revolution, 1763-1783
HIS 1303, United States Military History I 2 UNIT x STUDY GUIDE Title the protections the island nation was providing to its colonies. The colonists, however, were perturbed by the British attempts to deal with Native American tribes. In October 1763, the British established the Proclamation Line that closed the area beyond the Appalachians to colonists. The British felt this would provide a measure of protection to the colonists as well as eliminate the costly Indian wars funded by the crown’s coffers. However, the British did not factor in the colonists’ lust for la nd, and thus, rather than providing the colonists with a sense of protection, it incensed them through land limitations by proclamation (Millett et al., 2012). As the lines were drawn for both sides, the Continental Army (America’s first standing army), w as organized and commanded by George Washington despite Congress’s fear of such a military presence. Congress’ own monetary difficulties and inability to enforce its policies further complicated the American position. The spirit of independence that led to the American Revolution also proved to be a deterrent in successfully waging war (Millett et al., 2012). To viably wage such a war, cooperation was needed; throughout the conflict, this cooperation was always fragile and often nonexistent. Initially, the colonists sought to rectify the strained relationship with the mother country and claimed to be acting only in a mode of self-defense. However, there were issues that began to change this initial colonial outlook. First, the position of the British continued to incense rather than soothe colonial egos. The British appeared determined to reign in the colonies and lacked any desire to address much less compromise on the issues with which the colonists challenged the mother country. Furthermore, to slay the giant (England), the colonies would need help with numbers, resources, and, especially, finances. To obtain this help from foreign powers like France, Spain, and the Netherlands, they needed to emphasize the severed bonds with England rather than repair the relationship. The role of the standing army was supplemented by the role of the militia and is thoroughly explained in this unit. Besides birthing America’s first standing army, the revolution led to other technological developments. Britain had long been a naval powerhouse, and the patriots (a term claimed by the rebelling colonists) doubted the ability to overcome such force directly. However, even if the patriots could not end the conflict through the might of a navy, they did realize that such might, regardless of how small, could be used to weaken the British position. Thus, prior to the end of the war, the Americans had a total of four navies each with specific objectives and purposes as well as naval support from another colonial power, France. During this period, a development emerged that would change the history of warfare forever: the turtle submarine (Millett et al., 2012). The war impacted all segments of colonial society. Native Americans played a big role in the unfolding dispute. Initially, both sides encouraged the Native Americans to remain neutral; however, as the war continued to wage, they chose increasing involvement. For the first time since the institution of their confederation, the Iroquois fought each other, the Oneida and Tuscarora tribes standing with the patriots, while the others, following the lead of the powerful Mohawks fought for the British. More Native Americans did ally themselves with the British, ironically, for the same reason that the patriots began the war: freedom. It was obvious that while the British might have been unable or, perhaps, even unwilling to enforce the Proclamation Line of 1763 that temporarily closed the area west of the Appalachians to white settlement to appease the Native American fears of illegal land purchases and encroachments by land speculators, fur traders, and frontiersmen, they did not harbor the same lust for land as the colonists. The British used the excuse of the necessity of enforcing the proclamation as one of their reasons to maintain a standing army in the colonies. The standing army and A cutaway depiction of David Bushnell’s Turtle (Bushnell, 1916)
HIS 1303, United States Military History I 3 UNIT x STUDY GUIDE Title the continued taxation of the colonies stirred up continued resentment and a stronger desire for self-rule and independence from England (Millett et al., 2012). Washington proved to be an excellent choice of commander for the Continental Army. As a Virginian, he provided a colonial feel and worked tirelessly to create an army that would serve as a symbol the very backbone of colonial resistance. Given it was such a potent symbol, this army was to be protected at all costs, and Washington was ready to employ techniques of warfare utilized and adapted during frontier campaigns that the structured British had not previously encountered. Another reason Washington was such a commendable choice was his previous background as a politician. Unlike many military leaders, both prior to and following him, Washington realized the importance of respecting the limitations placed on him by the government, though this did not mean he did not challenge the fledgling government as with his secretary. This was evident by the many letters written by Alexander Hamilton, Wash ington’s subordinate officer, requesting support and arguing for the needs of his forces. Washington understood the fear of a standing army among his countrymen and did not place demands or orders upon the government, though this often led to the privation of the very troops he held so dear (Millett et al., 2012). As a figurehead of the resistance and undoubtedly a major player in the war, Washington was not alone in winning the war. Many other men contributed a great deal. A notable example is Benedict Arnold. In the early stages of the conflict, Arnold was a patriot leader who displayed a strong sense of duty and passion for the cause. Among his most significant accolades was the leadership that he demonstrated in his advance through the Maine wilderness and the capture of Quebec. However, as the war progressed, for endlessly debatable reasons (including pressure from his wife), Arnold famously changed his allegiance to the British. His position provided him unique advantages that were attractive to the English, and this switch in loyalties made his name synonymous with treason and treachery. Another patriot leader who contributed a great deal to the realization of an independent America, though he is sometimes overlooked, was Nathanael Greene. Spending much of the conflict as an assistant to Washington, he could not pinpoint any one specific colonial victory as his own, but the results of his leadership during the Southern campaign did much to further the cause. Many factors played into the eventual colonial win. Washington and the pride he instilled in the new nation was clearly one such reason. Another was the courage and determination that the patriots displayed. Certainly, desertion influenced their performance, but the average soldier clung to his new nation willingly and served loyally with a sense of duty from God. Additionally, these men served at home, protecting their land American Revolutionary War General Benedict Arnold (Hart, 1776) General George Washington (King, 18th century)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help