According to you which paradigm is more suitable to do an evaluation research in criminal justice or

.docx

School

Lamar University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

5330

Subject

Sociology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

1

Uploaded by abbym2459

Report
When conducting evaluation research in criminal justice organizations, the most suitable paradigm is the Mixed-Methods Paradigm. This approach combines qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and impact of programs and interventions within the criminal justice system. By using both qualitative and quantitative methods, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics within criminal justice organizations. The combination of methods allows for triangulation, where data from different sources are used to validate findings, leading to more robust and reliable results. Criminal justice organizations deal with multifaceted issues, and the mixed-methods approach allows researchers to address diverse needs and capture a wide range of outcomes. To Implement the Mixed-Methods Paradigm in Evaluation Research one should use methods such as surveys, statistical analysis of crime rates, recidivism rates, and other measurable outcomes to quantify the impact of programs and policies. For gathering data you should employ techniques like interviews, focus groups, and observations to gather in-depth insights into the experiences and perceptions of stakeholders within the criminal justice system. When you gather all your findings then, analyze and integrate both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a holistic evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions and policies. By employing the mixed-methods paradigm, researchers can generate a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of programs and policies within criminal justice organizations. “The scientific validity of the study colors and determines the value and objectivity of the research findings and their policy implications li tis is “applied” research in that the primary objective of program evaluation is to determine whether the crime prevention program is reaching its goals- defined and desired results.” (Mertens 2019) References: 1. Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2019). Program evaluation theory and practice, Second edition: A comprehensive guide (Second). Guilford Publications.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help