Different Strategies for the Formation of Teams at Riordan

665 Words3 Pages
There are a number of different strategies for the formation of teams at Riordan. These strategies, along with their respective strengths and weaknesses, can be summarized in the following table: Strategy Strengths Weaknesses Leadership Creation Strategy Accountability Communication Standardization Lack of motivation Lack of innovation Collaborative Teams High Motivation High innovation Good communication Less accountability Less standardization Coordinating Independent Workers Allows for the formation of a team of experts Strong central control of project High level of accountability Low communication between members Low mechanisms for resolving conflict The most suitable for CardiValve is the Leadership Creation Strategy. This team is comprised of talented individuals, but their efforts need to be led and guided by experienced managers. Having a high level of accountability will allow the managers to ensure that the product is of a high standard, which is demanded by the FDA for medical devices. In addition, having strong, experienced leadership provides clear channels of communication and also provides a formalized mechanism by which conflict between group members can be resolved. There are a number of barriers to the formation of a team. Some are basic, such a being located in different geographic areas. The channels of communication flow will need to be developed to ensure that the team functions well despite being remotely-located. Also,

More about Different Strategies for the Formation of Teams at Riordan

Open Document