Ira Wolfe Articles On Employee Engagement

Employee Engagement - This is the communication between an employee and staff on all levels. There are 3 dimensions of employee engagement - Intellectual, Affective and Social. If these dimensions are positive, encouraging and work related, staff will feel valued and make greater contributions towards the organisation.

Crim and Seijts (2006, p.1) define employee engagement as “a person who is fully involved in, and enthusiastic about, his or her work”. Employees that are engaged are inspired and go above and beyond their job functions to support the company and help the company achieve its goals. The lack of engaged employees are a major problem in the United States. According to Gallup, in 2014 only 31.5% of employees were engaged (Adkins, 2015). Even though this sounds low, it is actually the most engaged the United States workforce has been since 2000. The author’s research is important because if there is a link between leader’s

The CIPD (2014) factsheet states that Employee Engagement is a concept that ‘is generally seen as an internal state of being – physical, mental and emotional – that brings together earlier concepts of work effort, organisational commitment, job satisfaction and ‘flow’ (or optimal experience)’. An engaged workforce willingly demonstrates discretionary effort within their roles; their goals and values reflect that of their employers/organisation; they express a passion for work, feel valued and that their work has meaning.

1.1/1.2/1.3 – Requires me to describe what is employee engagement and how does it differ, if at all, from related concepts like employee involvement, employee participation and employee consultation? Also how far is employee engagement something which is genuinely new and distinctive, or is it merely a repackaging of old and well-established ideas?

Employee engagement is a simple, but looked over phase of everyday business. Most of us don’t even think about it in everyday life, or even know what employee engagement is. What does it mean to be an engaged employee? It means that you’re interacting effectively with your

Engagement is a sign of satisfaction and loyalty to the firm which can be incurred by increasing job resources

This course emphasized the concept of employee engagement in the workplace. Employee engagement is critical for many reasons, it is necessary to understand and help organizations lower employee turnover, increase revenue, and help managers communicate more efficiently. There are differences between employees who are actively engaged and disengaged in the workplace. Within active engagement, it is more likely that an employee is confident, valued, and inspired within the organization. They understand their personal worth in the group. The quote by Maya Angelou resonated with me, “People will forget what you said, what you did, but they will never forget how you made them feel”. This quote speaks true to all aspects of life, not just in the workplace. When we treat people with their God-given significance, it can motivate them to work and live better. Employees who are

The second aspect suggested by Macey and Schneider (2008) refers to the positive conditions encountered at work. This aspect implies that behavioral engagement is more likely to take place when some conditions such as the nature of the work people do and the leadership encountered at work yield positive attitudes; therefore behaviorally engagement. In conclusion, there is no single definition of employee engagement that can encompass the full meaning of the term. Employee engagement is simply a combination of the facets explained above; employee engagement is the key to create and yield positive results at the work place, is the treasure any organization wants to possess in order to create competitive advantage and success in general. According to studies made by Gallup, engaged workplaces yield a 38% in productivity and a 27% increase in profitability. Promoting an engaged workforce should be one of the first goals the organization sets. Maximizing the innate talents by taking into consideration the psychological state engagement, behavioral engagement and personal traits engagement of every individual will bear a sustainable organizational growth.

Employee engagement is the emotional commitment an employee shows for the organization and its goals (Kruse 2012). It can also be defined as the act of an employee being involved in, enthusiastic about and satisfied with his or her work (Seijts et al.., 2006). An engaged employee is one who actually cares and is passionate about his job and company goals. He or she does not work just to get a paycheck rather they work to ensure the organization’s goals are met.

Employee engagement has become a top priority for most companies and is a heavily used buzz word in the corporate world. With all the focus centered on this topic research shows that most employees are still not engaged. Recent surveys conducted by Gallup showed that active disengagement of employees is at a record low (Adkins, 2015). In our current economy companies need all the help they can get being profitable and maintaining a good company image. Good employee engagement can play a big part in that process. Employee engagement can positively or negatively affect a company on numerous levels:

Employee engagement is a relatively new concept. According to Stairs (2005, p.8) research into engagement has completely being ignored and a Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) report (Alfes et al., 2010, p.4) supported this view by stating that while academia became silent on the concept of employee engagement, the concept was actually placed on the discussion board by Human Resources (HR) professionals, practitioners, and consultants. Kular et al (2008) further state that there remains a paucity of critical academic literature on employee engagement. However, with the advent of concerns given to engagement in modern times, the concept has seen new faces of definitions and explanations given to it. The very first definition was given by Kahn (1990, p.694) as “the harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally during role performances”. The aspect of engagement that is cognitive concerns employees’ beliefs about the organization itself, the leaders and the conditions under which employees work. The emotional side of employee engagement is about how employees feel of each of the three factors and whether they have positive or negative attitudes toward the organization and its leaders. The physical aspect of employee engagement concerns the physical energies exerted by individuals to accomplish their roles. Form this background, Kahn (1990)

The concept of employee engagement is widely used ingredients in human resources. The concept is difficult to determine the exact cause, it often job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational behavior, and is believed to have evolved from the concept of citizenship. Many human resources managers and defined employee engagement human recourse have emerged in the literature which presents specific challenges for both professionals: “A Human recourse executive for

In today 's corporate world, where reliability to organizations is fading fast, engagement has been growing by companies to maintain employees. Employee engagement is “a level of commitment and involvement of employees towards their organization and its value,” (Maslach, 2008). An engaged employee works with his/her colleagues to progress their productivity within their job, for the ultimate benefit of the organization. Effective managers have the talent to get things done by other employees. This is done by motivating employees to accomplish tasks. A manager must be able to represent these tasks to employees. Motivated employees will work with the manager to accomplish company objectives. Those employees who are displeased will work against company objectives. In this study it examines to see what enhances employee engagement or what can create the employee to be disengaged. Employee engagement drives employees ' motivation, job satisfaction, and loyalty to their companies. A manager’s capability to build solid relationships with employees generates engaging employees which then they can accomplish at the highest level and be a successful employee, (Judge, 2001). Employee motivation is seen as an important building block in the growth of effective businesses. A motivated employee symbolizes both a modest advantage and as a strategic asset in the corporate world, which is why the issue of building self-motivation in employees has sparkled interest in managers. Not

Predictors of employee engagement are satisfaction with leadership, employee development, communication and innovation (Persson, 2010). Job demands and job resources foster contradictory psychological processes, one connecting to burnout and the other to employee engagement (Persson, 2010). Burnout is a process that occurs when job demands causes weakening of health and depleted energy as the negative outcome (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Persson, 2010). Employee engagement develops from a motivational process dependent on job resources (Persson, 2010). The Intrinsic and extrinsic reasons that motive employees are feeling of belonging, competency, autonomy, financial compensation and benefits. These reasons are shown to enhance employee engagement, whereas the absence will weaken engagement and result in frustration and failure to achieve company objectives (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Persson, 2010).

Improved production and productivity is the heart of employee engagement. Engaged employees give their best work, freely and discretionary effort as an integral part of the daily activity at work. Employee engagement is a blend of job satisfaction, organizational