A marine biologist has been monitoring the salmon population in a local river. He records the following data: Month 10 18 20 Samon 28 18 56 70 106 215 240 452 1. View the scatter plot on your calculator to state whether a linear regression analysis is appropriate. 2. If appropriate, calculate the correlation coefficient and interpret it. 3. Complete a 6 step hypothesis test at an alpha level of 0.05 to determine if a significant correlation exists between time and # of salmon in the river.

A marine biologist has been monitoring the salmon population in a local river. He records the following data: Month 10 18 20 Samon 28 18 56 70 106 215 240 452 1. View the scatter plot on your calculator to state whether a linear regression analysis is appropriate. 2. If appropriate, calculate the correlation coefficient and interpret it. 3. Complete a 6 step hypothesis test at an alpha level of 0.05 to determine if a significant correlation exists between time and # of salmon in the river.

Name: COMPLETE 6 STEPS A marine biologist has been monitoring the salmon pop
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: COMPLETE 6 STEPS A marine biologist has been monitoring the salmon population in a local river. He records the following data: A marine biologist has been monitoring the salmon population in a local river. He records the followingdata:Month11101820Sa

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section4.5: Correlation And Causation

Problem 2CYU

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Find the equation of the regression line for the following data set. x 1 2 3 y 0 3 4
Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
If a sample of 25 pairs of data yields a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.390 and the scatterplot displays a linear trend, can you use the regression equation to make predictions, assuming your x-values are within the domain of the data set? Choose your answer from the multiple choice answers below A.) Yes, because rcrit = 0.396 and the regression coefficient, r, is less than this value. B.) Yes, because rcrit = 0.381 and the regression coefficient, r, is greater than this value. C.) No, because rcrit = 0.381 and the regression coefficient, r, is greater than this value. D.) No, because rcrit = 0.396 and the regression coefficient, r, is less than this value.
A sample of n = 15 pairs of X and Y scores produces a Pearson correlation of r = 0.45, SSY = 90. a) If the regression equation was found for these scores, how much of the Y variability would be predicted by the regression equation (SSregression) and how much would not be predicted (SSresidual)? b) Does the regression equation predict a significant portion of the variability for the Y scores? (Equivalently, is the Pearson correlation significant?)
Dr. Spring is a consultant for the National Youth Organization of long jumpers. His goal is to predict how farany given individual will jump (4 attempts) based only on his/her height. Fortunately he had access to height and length of jumps from last year’s competition. Initial analyses of the data were as follows: contestant height (inches) (X) Length of jumps (inches) (Y) mean: 53.100 mean: 123.650 SD: 4.667 SD: 10.535 correlation coefficient= .485, p= .030 (a) Conduct a linear regressionanalysis to predict the length of jumps for the following contestants. (do not round) Contestant number one 52inches tall, length of jumps = Contestant number two 70inches tall, length of jumps = Contestant number three 77inches tall, length of jumps =
The Quantitative Environmental Learning Project reported widths and lengths (in centimeters) of a sample of 88 Puget Sound butter clams. Output is shown for the regression of length on width. Pearson correlation of Width and Length = 0.989 The regression equation is Length = 0.257 + 1.22 Width Predictor Coef SE Coef T P Constant 0.25689 0.09293 2.76 0.007 Width 1.22013 0.01940 62.89 XXXXX S = 0.3253 R-Sq = 97.9% R-Sq(adj) = 97.8% How do we denote typical vertical distance of clam length from the regression line for the population of all butter clams?  s  ŷ   b0  β1  β0  σ  r  b1  μ y
The Quantitative Environmental Learning Project reported widths and lengths (in centimeters) of a sample of 88 Puget Sound butter clams. Output is shown for the regression of length on width. Pearson correlation of Width and Length = 0.989 The regression equation is Length = 0.257 + 1.22 Width Predictor Coef SE Coef T P Constant 0.25689 0.09293 2.76 0.007 Width 1.22013 0.01940 62.89 XXXXX S = 0.3253 R-Sq = 97.9% R-Sq(adj) = 97.8%  Assume the data to be a representative sample taken from the population of all Puget Sound butter clams, with  b0, b1, and s  as reported in the output. Which of these do we know exactly for the population?  β0  β1   σ  all of the above  none of the above
The Quantitative Environmental Learning Project reported widths and lengths (in centimeters) of a sample of 88 Puget Sound butter clams. Output is shown for the regression of length on width. Pearson correlation of Width and Length = 0.989 The regression equation is Length = 0.257 + 1.22 Width Predictor Coef SE Coef T P Constant 0.25689 0.09293 2.76 0.007 Width 1.22013 0.01940 62.89 XXXXX S = 0.3253 R-Sq = 97.9% R-Sq(adj) = 97.8% Suppose we wanted to use the same data set (butter clam widths and lengths) to set up a confidence interval to estimate how much longer than wide butter clams tend to be. What would be the appropriate procedure? - -regression  - paired t   -two-sample t  -chi-square  -several-sample F
In the packaging department of a large aircraft parts distributor, a fairly reliable estimate of packaging and processing costs can be determined by knowing the weight of an order. Thus, the weight is a cost driver that accounts for a sizable fraction of the packaging and processing costs at this company. Data for the past 10 orders are given as follows. Solve, a. Estimate the b0 and b1 coefficients, and determine the linear regression equation to fit these data. b. What is the correlation coefficient (R)? c. If an order weighs 250 lb, how much should it cost to package and process it?
In the packaging department of a large aircraft parts distributor, a fairly reliable estimate of packaging and processing costs can be determined by knowing the weight of an order. Thus, the weight is a cost driver that accounts for a sizable fraction of the packaging and processing costs at this company. Data for the past 10 orders are given as follows: a. Estimate the b0 and b1 coefficients, and determine the linear regression equation to fit these data. b. What is the correlation coefficient (R)? c. If an order weighs 205 lb, how much should it cost to package and process it? Packaging and Processing Cost ($), y Weight (Pounds), x 99 240 111 275 86 210 85 185 121 315 114 300 111 285 100 270 109 275 85 200