At Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox, seating is limited at 39,000, Hence, the number of tickets issued is fixed at that figure (supply of tickets). Seeing a golden opportunity to raise revenue, the City of Boston levies a per ticket tax of $5 to be paid by each ticket buyer. Boston sports fans, a famously civic-minded lot, dutifully send in the $5 per ticket. Apply this information in terms of what this tells us about the elasticities of supply and demand. Given your analysis of these elasticities, on whom does the tax burden fall....the tickets sellers, the fans or both? Why?

At Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox, seating is limited at 39,000, Hence, the number of tickets issued is fixed at that figure (supply of tickets). Seeing a golden opportunity to raise revenue, the City of Boston levies a per ticket tax of $5 to be paid by each ticket buyer. Boston sports fans, a famously civic-minded lot, dutifully send in the $5 per ticket. Apply this information in terms of what this tells us about the elasticities of supply and demand. Given your analysis of these elasticities, on whom does the tax burden fall....the tickets sellers, the fans or both? Why?

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter6: Supply, Demand And Government Policies

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Continue your analysis of the video poker market in Cedar Rapids: demand by patrons for the games (in thousands per week) is Qd = 180 - 4P and the supply is Qs = 2P - 30 where P is the price in cents charged to play a game. Now suppose that the city of Cedar Rapids passes a new law which requires that all video poker arcades contribute m cents to a city charitable fund for each game played on their machines. This is, essentially, an excise tax. In a new diagram, show the effect of the new law on the market and explain this effect. (Do not try to give an algebraic solution; just show what happens graphically and provide a description. Please be sure to illustrate how the tax of m cents shifts a specific curve, consistent with the approach we’ve taken in this course in modeling taxes and subsidies. Clearly indicate the distance by which the curve has shifted. Recall that the direction of the shift carries a specific meaning in economics for depicting taxation/subsidies.) Graphically…
Many studies on rats and mice have established that charred meat grilled over hot coals causes cancer. Since the government cannot easily regulate home cooking methods, an alternative method has been proposed to discourage the consumption of barbecued meat. The proposal is to place a 100 percent tax at the retail level on charcoal briquets. Suppose the daily demand for charcoal was P= 100-Q/10 and the supply was P= 1 + Q./100 where P is in dollars per bag and Q is the number of 20 lb bags of charcoal sold weekly. a. What is the before and after - tax price of charcoal? b. Graph and show the deadweight loss due to the tax c. Why might this deadweight loss over estimate the loss to society from this tax?
Suppose the inverse demand curve for good X is given by the equation Px=10-Qx/10 and the supply curve is perfectly elastic (horizontal) at RM1. Good X is presently taxed at RM2 per unit. Good Y (which is independent of good X) has an inverse demand curve Py=5-Qy/20 and is also elastic at RM1. Good Y is untaxed 1. How much tax revenue is collected and what is the excess burden of the RM2 tax on X 2. How much revenue is collected if the tax on good A is reduced to RM1 per unit and good B at RM1 per unit? 3. What is the total excess burden of taxing both goods at RM1 per unit?
Consider the following market supply and demand information for cigarettes: Price ($) Demand for Cigarettes (in million packs per week) $2 12 3 10 4 8 5 6 6 4 7 2 and the supply is 8,000,000 cigarette packs per week. Now suppose that the government mandates a $1 excise tax per pack on the buyers of cigarettes. Who bears the economic incidence (tax burden) of the excise tax?…
Do you think profit could be maintained if the tax burden were simply passed on to the consumers in the form of higher selling price? How will this affect sales? Explain.
Suppose the demand curve for gasoline is more elastic than the supply curve for gasoline. If the government imposes a tax on gas stations (gasoline sellers), which party (buyers or sellers) will bear more of the tax burden? How will the tax burden change if the government imposed the tax on gasoline consumers, rather than sellers? explain in simple terms.
Suppose the market for cigarette is competitive. An economist estimates the price elasticity of demand and supply for cigarette are -0.8 and 0.7 respectively. Suppose the government imposes a per-unit tax on the cigarette sellers. Who, buyers or sellers, would share a heavier tax burden? Explain your answers without calculation.
Consumers of gasoline in (Manhattan) New York are known to have an elastic demand to price of gasoline, whereas those in (Los Angeles) California are inelastic in their demand to gasoline prices. Explain and analyze the effects of a gasoline tax imposed in these two states (of equal dollar-value) by answering the following questions: (a) Graphically represent the above scenario in each state, one graph representing the gasoline market in each state. On each graph clearly show: (i) Both the axes (ii) Supply and Demand schedules (iii) The shift in the relevant schedule as a result of the tax (iv) The area denoting the revenue given to the government by the consumers and the producers (v) The Deadweight loss
Suppose the supply of a good is given by the equation QS=600P−1,200 , and the demand for the good is given by the equation QD=1,600−200P , where quantity (Q) is measured in millions of units and price (P) is measured in dollars per unit. The government decides to levy an excise tax of $2.00 per unit on the good, to be paid by the seller. Calculate the value of each of the following, before the tax and after the tax, to complete the table that follows: 1. The equilibrium quantity produced 2. The equilibrium price consumers pay for the good 3. The price received by sellers Before Tax After Tax Equilibrium Quantity (Millions of units) Equilibrium Price per Unit Paid by Consumers Price per Unit Received by Sellers Given the information you calculated in the preceding table, the tax incidence on consumers is per unit of the good, and the tax incidence on producers is per unit of the good. The government receives in tax revenue from levying an excise tax of $2.00 per unit on this good. True…
Suppose the supply curve for cars is more elastic than the demand curve for cars. If the government imposes a tax on car sellers, which party (buyers or sellers) will bear more of the tax burden? How will the tax burden change if the government imposed the tax on car buyers, rather than sellers?
The market for a particular consumer good has a demand function given by: q = 24 - p and supply given by p = q + q^2, where q is the quantity and p is the price. Question: If the government decided not to set the price, but instead imposed a tax on production of $1 per unit, effectively increasing the cost to supply by $1 dollar per unit for every level of quantity supplied, what would the new equilibrium quantity be?
The following equations represent the inverse supply and demand functions in the market for Good B: PC = 180 - 2QD PP = 40 + 2QS where PC and PP are the prices paid by consumers and received by producers respectively. QD and QS are the quantities demanded and supplied, respectively. Suppose the government imposes a tax of $8 per unit of Good B. What is the incidence of this tax on consumers and producers?