Consider a first-price auction to sell an object in which there are 3 bidders. Recall that in a first-price auction, the bidder who makes the highest bid wins. And the price he pays for the object is equal to his bid. Here, we also assume that if there is a tie, the bidder with the biggest index wins. For instance, if (b1.b2.b3)-(5,6,6), bidders 2 and 3 make the highest bids. The bidder who wins the object is bidder 3 because 3>2. We will also assume that the bids have to be integers. So, a bid can be 0,1.2.3. but it cannot be 3.67 or 5.2. Let the three bidders valuations of the object be vi-$10, v2-$15, v3-s20 Let the bids made by the three bidders be: (b1,b2.b3) (a) is the case when (b1,b2.b3)-(0,15,15) a Nash equilibrium? Explain why it is or it is not a Nash equilibrium. (b) is the case when (b1.b2.b3)-(0,14.15) a Nash equilibrium? Explain why it is or it is not a Nash equilibrium.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
5th Edition
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Chapter18: Auctions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 9MC
icon
Related questions
Question
Consider a first-price auction to sell an object in which there are 3 bidders. Recall that in a first-price auction, the bidder who makes the highest
bid wins. And the price he pays for the object is equal to his bid. Here, we also assume that if there is a tie, the bidder with the biggest index wins.
For instance, if (b1.b2,b3)-(5,6,6), bidders 2 and 3 make the highest bids. The bidder who wins the object is bidder 3 because 3>2.
We will also assume that the bids have to be integers. So, a bid can be 0,1.2.3. but it cannot be 3.67 or 5.2.
Let the three bidders' valuations of the object be: v1=$10, v2-$15, v3-$20
Let the bids made by the three bidders be: (b1,b2.b3)
(a) Is the case when (b1.b2.b3)-(0,15,15) a Nash equilibrium? Explain why it is or it is not a Nash equilibrium.
(b) Is the case when (b1.b2.b3)=(0,14,15) a Nash equilibrium? Explain why it is or it is not a Nash equilibrium.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider a first-price auction to sell an object in which there are 3 bidders. Recall that in a first-price auction, the bidder who makes the highest bid wins. And the price he pays for the object is equal to his bid. Here, we also assume that if there is a tie, the bidder with the biggest index wins. For instance, if (b1.b2,b3)-(5,6,6), bidders 2 and 3 make the highest bids. The bidder who wins the object is bidder 3 because 3>2. We will also assume that the bids have to be integers. So, a bid can be 0,1.2.3. but it cannot be 3.67 or 5.2. Let the three bidders' valuations of the object be: v1=$10, v2-$15, v3-$20 Let the bids made by the three bidders be: (b1,b2.b3) (a) Is the case when (b1.b2.b3)-(0,15,15) a Nash equilibrium? Explain why it is or it is not a Nash equilibrium. (b) Is the case when (b1.b2.b3)=(0,14,15) a Nash equilibrium? Explain why it is or it is not a Nash equilibrium.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Personal Valuation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage