pH Sensitivity of the Glu-GABA Antiporter How Hemorrhagic E. coli Resists the Acid Environment 300 GadC AdiC 250 of the Stomach mst Recent years have been marked by a series of food poisoning outbreaks involving hemorrhagic (producing internal bleeding) strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli). Bacteria are often a source of food poisoning, typically milder infections caused by food-borne strepto- coccal bacteria. Less able to bear the extremely acidic conditions encountered by food in the human stomach (pH = 2), E. coli has not been as common a hemorrhagic strains of E. coli responsible for recent out- breaks seem to have evolved more elaborate acid-resistance 200- 150 100 50- problem. The 7 pH systems. How do hemorrhagic E. coli bacteria survive in the acid environment of the stomach? The problem they face, in essence, is that they ions, many of which diffuse into their cells. To rid them- selves of these excess hydrogen ions, the E. coli cells use a clever system to pump hydrogen ions back out of their cells. are submerged in a sea of hydrogen Analysis 1. Applying Concepts a. Variable. In the graph, what is the dependent First, the hemorrhagic E. coli cells take up cellular variable? hydrogen ions by using the enzyme glutamic acid decarbox- ylase (GAD) to convert the amino acid glutamate to Y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a decarboxylation reaction that consumes a hydrogen ion. Second, the hemorrhagic E. coli export this GABA from their cell cytoplasm using a Glu-GABA antiporter called GadC (this transmembrane protein channel is called an antiporter because it transports two molecules across the membrane in opposite directions). However, to survive elsewhere in the human body, it is important that the Glu-GABA antiporter of hemorrhagic E. coli not function, lest it short-circuit metabolism. To see if b. Substrate. What is a substrate? In this investigation, what are the substrates that are accumulating? c. pH. What is the difference in hydrogen ion concentration between pH 5 and pH 7? How many times more (or less) is that? Explain. 2. Interpreting Data a. Does the amount of amino acid transported in the 10-minute experimental interval (expressed as substrate accumulation) vary with pH for the arginine-transporting AdiC antiporter? For the glutamate-transporting GadC antiporter? b. Compare the amount of substrate accumulated by AdiC in 10 minutes at pH 9.0 with that accumulated at pH 5.0. What fraction of the low pH activity is observed at the higher pH? c. In a similar fashion, compare the amount of substrate accumulated by GadC at pH 9.O with that accumulated at pH 5.0. What fraction of the low pH activity is observed at the higher pH? 3. Making Inferences Would you say that the GadC antiporter exhibits the same pH AdiC antiporter? If not, which antiporter is less active at nonacid pHs? 4. Drawing Conclusions Is the glutamate-GABA antiporter GadC active at nonacid pHs? 5. Further Analysis The GadC antiporter also transports the amino acid glutamine (Gln). Do you think this activity has any role to play in combating low pH environments? How would you test this hypothesis? the GadC antiporter indeed functions only in acid environ- ments, investigators compared its activity at a variety of pHs with that of a different amino acid antiporter called AdiC, which transports arginine out of cells under a broad range of conditions. The results of monitoring transport for 10 minutes are presented in the graph. Outside Inside cell cell dependence as the GABA Glutamate Chapter 5 Membranes 111 Substrate accumulation (nmol per mg protein) Inquiry & Analysis -L0 -6

Biochemistry
6th Edition
ISBN:9781305577206
Author:Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Publisher:Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Chapter24: Lipid Biosynthesis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 19P
icon
Related questions
Question

Need help with number 2

pH Sensitivity of the Glu-GABA Antiporter
How Hemorrhagic E. coli
Resists the Acid Environment
300
GadC
AdiC
250
of the Stomach
mst
Recent years have been marked by a series of food
poisoning outbreaks involving hemorrhagic (producing
internal bleeding) strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli
(E. coli). Bacteria are often a source of food poisoning,
typically milder infections caused by food-borne strepto-
coccal bacteria. Less able to bear the extremely acidic
conditions encountered by food in the human stomach
(pH = 2), E. coli has not been as common a
hemorrhagic strains of E. coli responsible for recent out-
breaks seem to have evolved more elaborate acid-resistance
200-
150
100
50-
problem. The
7
pH
systems.
How do hemorrhagic E. coli bacteria survive in the
acid environment of the stomach? The problem they face,
in essence, is that they
ions, many of which diffuse into their cells. To rid them-
selves of these excess hydrogen ions, the E. coli cells use a
clever system to pump hydrogen ions back out of their
cells.
are submerged in a sea of hydrogen
Analysis
1. Applying Concepts
a. Variable. In the graph, what is the dependent
First, the hemorrhagic E. coli cells take up cellular
variable?
hydrogen ions by using the enzyme glutamic acid decarbox-
ylase (GAD) to convert the amino acid glutamate to
Y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a decarboxylation reaction that
consumes a hydrogen ion.
Second, the hemorrhagic E. coli export this GABA
from their cell cytoplasm using a Glu-GABA antiporter
called GadC (this transmembrane protein channel is called
an antiporter because it transports two molecules across the
membrane in opposite directions).
However, to survive elsewhere in the human body, it
is important that the Glu-GABA antiporter of hemorrhagic
E. coli not function, lest it short-circuit metabolism. To see if
b. Substrate. What is a substrate? In this
investigation, what are the substrates that are
accumulating?
c. pH. What is the difference in hydrogen
ion concentration between pH 5 and pH 7?
How many times more (or less) is that? Explain.
2. Interpreting Data
a. Does the amount of amino acid transported
in the 10-minute experimental interval
(expressed as substrate accumulation) vary
with pH for the arginine-transporting AdiC
antiporter? For the glutamate-transporting
GadC antiporter?
b. Compare the amount of substrate accumulated
by AdiC in 10 minutes at pH 9.0 with that
accumulated at pH 5.0. What fraction of the
low pH activity is observed at the higher pH?
c. In a similar fashion, compare the amount of
substrate accumulated by GadC at pH 9.O
with that accumulated at pH 5.0. What
fraction of the low pH activity is observed at
the higher pH?
3. Making Inferences Would you say that the GadC
antiporter exhibits the same pH
AdiC antiporter? If not, which antiporter is less
active at nonacid pHs?
4. Drawing Conclusions Is the glutamate-GABA
antiporter GadC active at nonacid pHs?
5. Further Analysis The GadC antiporter also
transports the amino acid glutamine (Gln). Do you
think this activity has any role to play in combating
low pH environments? How would you test this
hypothesis?
the GadC antiporter indeed functions only in acid environ-
ments, investigators compared its activity at a variety of pHs
with that of a different amino acid antiporter called AdiC,
which transports arginine out of cells under a broad
range of conditions. The results of monitoring transport for
10 minutes are presented in the graph.
Outside
Inside
cell
cell
dependence as the
GABA
Glutamate
Chapter 5 Membranes 111
Substrate accumulation
(nmol per mg protein)
Inquiry & Analysis
-L0
-6
Transcribed Image Text:pH Sensitivity of the Glu-GABA Antiporter How Hemorrhagic E. coli Resists the Acid Environment 300 GadC AdiC 250 of the Stomach mst Recent years have been marked by a series of food poisoning outbreaks involving hemorrhagic (producing internal bleeding) strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli). Bacteria are often a source of food poisoning, typically milder infections caused by food-borne strepto- coccal bacteria. Less able to bear the extremely acidic conditions encountered by food in the human stomach (pH = 2), E. coli has not been as common a hemorrhagic strains of E. coli responsible for recent out- breaks seem to have evolved more elaborate acid-resistance 200- 150 100 50- problem. The 7 pH systems. How do hemorrhagic E. coli bacteria survive in the acid environment of the stomach? The problem they face, in essence, is that they ions, many of which diffuse into their cells. To rid them- selves of these excess hydrogen ions, the E. coli cells use a clever system to pump hydrogen ions back out of their cells. are submerged in a sea of hydrogen Analysis 1. Applying Concepts a. Variable. In the graph, what is the dependent First, the hemorrhagic E. coli cells take up cellular variable? hydrogen ions by using the enzyme glutamic acid decarbox- ylase (GAD) to convert the amino acid glutamate to Y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a decarboxylation reaction that consumes a hydrogen ion. Second, the hemorrhagic E. coli export this GABA from their cell cytoplasm using a Glu-GABA antiporter called GadC (this transmembrane protein channel is called an antiporter because it transports two molecules across the membrane in opposite directions). However, to survive elsewhere in the human body, it is important that the Glu-GABA antiporter of hemorrhagic E. coli not function, lest it short-circuit metabolism. To see if b. Substrate. What is a substrate? In this investigation, what are the substrates that are accumulating? c. pH. What is the difference in hydrogen ion concentration between pH 5 and pH 7? How many times more (or less) is that? Explain. 2. Interpreting Data a. Does the amount of amino acid transported in the 10-minute experimental interval (expressed as substrate accumulation) vary with pH for the arginine-transporting AdiC antiporter? For the glutamate-transporting GadC antiporter? b. Compare the amount of substrate accumulated by AdiC in 10 minutes at pH 9.0 with that accumulated at pH 5.0. What fraction of the low pH activity is observed at the higher pH? c. In a similar fashion, compare the amount of substrate accumulated by GadC at pH 9.O with that accumulated at pH 5.0. What fraction of the low pH activity is observed at the higher pH? 3. Making Inferences Would you say that the GadC antiporter exhibits the same pH AdiC antiporter? If not, which antiporter is less active at nonacid pHs? 4. Drawing Conclusions Is the glutamate-GABA antiporter GadC active at nonacid pHs? 5. Further Analysis The GadC antiporter also transports the amino acid glutamine (Gln). Do you think this activity has any role to play in combating low pH environments? How would you test this hypothesis? the GadC antiporter indeed functions only in acid environ- ments, investigators compared its activity at a variety of pHs with that of a different amino acid antiporter called AdiC, which transports arginine out of cells under a broad range of conditions. The results of monitoring transport for 10 minutes are presented in the graph. Outside Inside cell cell dependence as the GABA Glutamate Chapter 5 Membranes 111 Substrate accumulation (nmol per mg protein) Inquiry & Analysis -L0 -6
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Environmental health & hazards
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Biochemistry
Biochemistry
Biochemistry
ISBN:
9781305577206
Author:
Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305143531
Author:
CURREN
Publisher:
Cengage
3-2-1 Code It
3-2-1 Code It
Biology
ISBN:
9781337660549
Author:
GREEN
Publisher:
Cengage