Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781259290619
Author: Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 5CACQ
a)
To determine
The value of x when the strategy D is dominant for player 2.
b)
To determine
The value of x when strategy B is dominant for player 1.
c)
To determine
The value of x when the game has only one Nash equilibrium (B,D).
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Use the following normal-form game to answer the following questions. a. For what values of x is strategy D (strictly) dominant for player 2? b. For what values of x is strategy B (strictly) dominant for player 1? c. For what values of x is (B, D) the only Nash equilibrium of the game?
In a game of chicken, two drivers are heading towards each other on a collision course. The first one to swerve is
considered the "chicken" and loses. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? a) Both drivers swerve b) Neither
driver swerves c) One driver swerves while the other doesn't d) It depends on the specific
Consider the following game: Mercedes-Benz and Honda are the only two firms in the market for automobiles. Each firm has two strategies: produce high-grade vehicles or produce low-grade vehicles. The first entry in the bracket is the payoffs (in $billion) of Mercedes-Benz and the second entry is the payoffs of Honda. (see the image)
What is the dominant strategy of Mercedes-Benz and Honda? Also, what is the Nash equilibrium of this game?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- O Cell A O Cell C O Cell E O Cell I None of the abovearrow_forwardFind all the Nash equilibria (in the strategic form) and the subgame perfect nash equilibria in the following game. Are they the same ?arrow_forwardIn the game above, what is/are the EFFICIENT sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium?arrow_forward
- Can a strategy be dominant for one player in a Nash equilibriumarrow_forwardIs the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game a Nash equilibrium? Why? The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is a Nash equilibrium because no player can improve his or her payoff by changing strategy unilaterally. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is not a Nash equilibrium because players do not end up in the best combination for both. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is not a Nash equilibrium because both players can improve their payoffs by cooperating. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is a Nash equilibrium because it is a noncooperative game in which both players have to expect that the other is purely selfish.arrow_forwardWhich of the following best describes Nash equilibrium? a) A situation where one player dominates the others b) A situation where each player's strategy is optimal given the strategies of the others c) A situation where all players cooperate perfectly d) A situation where players change strategies constantlyarrow_forward
- Imagine that there are two snowboard manufacturers (FatSki and WideBoard) in the market. Each firm can either produce ten or twenty snowboards per day. The table below (see attached) shows the profit per snowboard for each firm that will result given the joint production decisions of these two firms. Draw the game payoff matrix for this situation. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? What is the Nash equilibrium solution and how many boards should each player produce each day? Since FatSki and WideBoard must play this game repeatedly (i.e. make production decisions every day), what strategy would you advise them to play in order to maximize their payoff over the long term?arrow_forwardIn the following two-user game, the payoffs of users Alice and Bob are exactly negative of each other in all the combinations of strategies (a,a), (a,b), (b,a), (b,b). This models an extreme case of competition, and is called a zero-sum game. Please point out every pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, and explain why it is. a b a (1, -1) (3, -3) (2, -2) (5, -5)arrow_forwardThis table shows a game played between two players, A and B. The payoffs in the table are shown as (Payoff to A, Payoff to B). B Left Right (3, 1) (5,7) (4, 3) Center (1, 4) (2, 2) (3, 2) (6, 2) (4, 6) (5, 5) Up Middle Down Which of the following outcomes represents a Nash equilibrium in the game? (Up, Center) (Middle, Right) (Down, Left) (Down, Center)arrow_forward
- Consider the following extensive form of the game. The outcome in the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game is [ Select one option] ["Large; Don't Enter", "Large; Enter", "Small; Don't Enter", "Small; Enter"]. It would not pay for the incumbent to produce the large quantity if its profits from producing large quantity is less than $ [ Select one option ] ["50", "60", "100", "0"].arrow_forwardTrue or false? If a game has a Nash equilibrium, that equilibrium will be the equilibrium that we expect to observe in the real world. False. People don’t always act in the way that a Nash equilibrium requires. People don’t always make the necessary calculations and they take into account the outcome of others. False. A Nash equilibrium is based on very strict assumptions that rarely hold in the real world. No real-world situation leads to a Nash equilibrium. True. As long as people are rational and have their own self-interest at heart, real-life games will result in the Nash equilibrium. True. Nash’s theory of equilibrium outcomes was derived from real-world interactions. The theory holds true for almost all real-world scenarios.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning