Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
5th Edition
ISBN: 9780357231913
Author: Frederick J Gravetter; Lori-Ann B. Forzano
Publisher: Cengage Limited
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 10, Problem 5E
In this chapter, we described a study in which Skjoeveland (2001) examined the effect of street parks on social interactions (p. 288). Although the results clearly showed greater social interaction in neighborhoods in which parks were built, the study does not justify a conclusion that building parks causes an increase in social interaction. Explain why the conclusion is not justified.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
A recent study randomly selected women from various countries around the world and collected information about diet and health. The women who at a Paleo diet had lower rates of Osteoporosis when compared to the other women in the study.
A. Which is the explanatory variable and why.
B. Which is the response variable and why.
C. Write a conclusion appropriate for this type of study that describes the relationship between the explanatory and response variables.
I need guidance on the last question listed at the end of this ....
An experiment was conducted to determine if motivational techniques in management significantly affected employee stress levels compared to no intervention. An employee survey was given to three groups: one group under a manager who started using a transformational motivation technique, one group under a manager who began using a transactional motivation technique, and then a control group with no new technique used. Stress levels were self-reported by the employees on 10-point Likert scales (0 – no stress, 1- little stress, 9 – very high stress). The results are shown below. Use alpha = 0.05.
Transformational
Transactional
Control
0
2
6
7
5
5
3
3
8
5
0
9
2
1
5
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in stress levels between the three groups.
Alternative hypothesis: There is significance difference in stress levels between the three groups.
The…
In a research study, wherein the researcher wanted to know if people’s intelligence is perceived differently based on race, participants observed either a Caucasian, African American, or Asian American stimulus person giving a speech. All stimulus persons gave the same verbal speech. After observing this person, the participants had to rate the stimulus person’s level of intelligence on a scale of 1-10. The participants were separated by gender and their ratings were analyzed separately.
How many possible interaction effects might the researcher find?
Group of answer choices
3
0
1
2
Chapter 10 Solutions
Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
Ch. 10.1 - Define, compare, and contrast the experimental,...Ch. 10.2 - Define a nonequivalent group design and identify...Ch. 10.2 - Explain how individual differences threaten the...Ch. 10.2 - Describe the two nonexperimental nonequivalent...Ch. 10.2 - Explain how a simple modification of the...Ch. 10.3 - Define a pre-post design and identify examples of...Ch. 10.3 - Identify the threats to internal validity for...Ch. 10.3 - Describe the nonexpenmental pretest-posttest...Ch. 10.3 - Explain how replacing the single observation...Ch. 10.4 - Define cross-sectional and longitudinal designs,...
Ch. 10.5 - Identify the statistical techniques that are...Ch. 10.5 - Explain how the terms quasi-independent variable...Ch. 10 - In addition to the key words, you should also be...Ch. 10 - Why are studies that examine the effects of aging...Ch. 10 - Explain why we can be more confident about causal...Ch. 10 - Give an example of a situation (aside from gender)...Ch. 10 - In this chapter, we described a study in which...Ch. 10 - Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) conducted a series...Ch. 10 - A researcher measures personality characteristics...Ch. 10 - A researcher wants to describe the effectiveness...Ch. 10 - Explain how the pretest helps minimize the threat...Ch. 10 - Describe the basic characteristics of a pre-post...Ch. 10 - To evaluate the effectiveness of a new television...Ch. 10 - Prob. 12ECh. 10 - A researcher wants to describe how fine motor...Ch. 10 - Identify the appropriate statistical test for each...Ch. 10 - The college offers all students an optional...Ch. 10 - All of us have a tendency to categorize people...Ch. 10 - Prob. 2EACh. 10 - Prob. 3EA
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- What is an experiment?arrow_forwardWhat is meant by the sample space of an experiment?arrow_forwardA mail-order catalog firm would like to test the effect of the size of a magazine advertisement and the advertisement design on the number of catalog requests received (data in thousands). Three advertising designs and two different size advertisements were considered. The data obtained follow. At the 0.05 level of significance, a. Is there an interaction between type of design and size of advertisement? b. Is there an effect due to type of design? c. Is there an effect due to size of advertisement?arrow_forward
- Dr. Guidry conducts a study examining the relationship between the number of friends one has and the experience of daily stress and life satisfaction. She randomly samples 1,500 elderly men and women in Nashville, Tennessee (the state capital), located in the southern United States. Dr. Guidry submits her study for publication in a scientific journal. If one of the peer reviewers is concerned about the external validity of her study, which of the following is the most important aspect of Dr. Guidry's study to consider? the number of significant findings the random sampling technique used to recruit the participants the number of people in the sample the use of three measured variablesarrow_forwardIn this same passage, answer the third question to the problem.arrow_forwardIt appears that there is some truth to the old adage “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.” Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that individuals with some history of adversity report better mental health and higher well-being compared to people with little or no history of adversity. In an attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher surveys a group of college students to determine the negative life events that they experienced in the past 5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For n = 16 participants with 2 or fewer negative experiences, the average well-being score is M = 42 with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with 5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is M = 48.6 with SS = 370. Is there a significant difference between the two populations represented by these two samples? Use a two-tailed test with α = .01 [use the 4-step procedure]. [Remember to assess whether the assumption of homogeneity of variances is satisfied or not, alpha = .01…arrow_forward
- It appears that there is some truth to the old adage “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.” Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that individuals with some history of adversity report better mental health and higher well-being compared to people with little or no history of adversity. In an attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher surveys a group of college students to determine the negative life events that they experienced in the past 5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For n = 18 participants with 2 or fewer negative experiences, the average well-being score is M = 42 with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with 5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is M = 48.6 with SS = 370. a.) Is there a significant difference between the two populations represented by these two samples? Include whether you reject or retain the Null Hypothesis. Use a two-tailed test with α = 0.01 b.) Compute Cohen’s d to measure the size of the effect. c.) Write a…arrow_forwardIt appears that there is some truth to the old adage “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.” Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that indi- viduals with some history of adversity report better mental health and higher well-being compared to people with little or no history of adversity. In an attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher surveys a group of college students to determine the negative life events that they experienced in the past 5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For n = 18 participants with 2 or fewer negative experi- ences, the average well-being score is M = 42 with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is M = 48.6 with SS = 370.a. Is there a significant difference between the two populations represented by these two samples? Use a two-tailed test with α = .05arrow_forwardNew Zealand requires cyclists to wear cycle helmets on public roads and this is enforced with fines. Most other countries have no mandatory helmet law, and a few have a law but do not enforce it. Finland is an example of a country that has a mandatory cycle helmet law but does not enforce it. A road safety researcher is interested in whether the proportion of cyclists in New Zealand do actually wear helmets is different to the proportion of cyclists in Finland who wear helmets. She has data from a survey which gives the following information: New Zealand: Of 210 New Zealand cyclists surveyed, 100 wear a helmet while cycling. Finland: Of 630 Finnish cyclists surveyed, 290 wear a helmet while cycling. Say that the true population proportion of New Zealand cyclists who wear a helmet is p1 and the true population proportion of Finnish cyclists who wear a helmet is p2. If our null hypothesis is H0: p1 - p2 = 0 and our alternative hypothesis is Ha: p1 - p2 ≠ 0, what is the z test…arrow_forward
- The British government conducts regular surveys of household spending. The average weekly household spending on tobacco products and alcoholic beverages for each of 11 regions in Great Britain are recorded. A scatterplot of spending on tobacco versus spending on alcohol is given. Spending on Tobacco What is the best interpretation of this scatterplot? There is a positive association between spending on tobacco and alcohol. There is a negative association between spending on tobacco and alcohol. There appears to be a strong positive linear association between spending on alcohol and tobacco, except for the one possible outlier with high tobacco expenditure but low alcohol expenditure. There is no interpretation that would be Spending on Alcoholarrow_forwardSuppose that you conduct a study in which you observe parents and their children interacting at home. You find that the more supportive parents are, the less aggressive their children are. What conclusion can you make? Children being aggressive causes parents to be less supportive. Level of support and aggression are positively correlated. Level of support and aggression are negatively correlated. Parents being more supportive causes children to be less aggressive.arrow_forwardIn a study examining the effect of humor on interpersonal attractions, McGee and Shevlin (2009) found that a man’s sense of humor had a significant effect on how he was perceived by women. In the study, female college students were given brief descriptions of a potential romantic partner and then rated the attractiveness of the male on a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). The fictitious male was described positively as being single, ambitious, and having good job prospects. In one condition, the description also said that he had a great sense of humor. The results showed that the description was rated significantly higher when “a sense of humor” was included. To examine this effect further, a researcher selected a sample of n = 16 college males and asked them to read a brief description of a female and then rate the attractiveness of the woman in the description. The description had been used in previous research but was modified by adding a statement describing a good sense of humor.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...
Algebra
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...
Algebra
ISBN:9781680331141
Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:9781305652231
Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Sampling Methods and Bias with Surveys: Crash Course Statistics #10; Author: CrashCourse;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rf-fIpB4D50;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Statistics: Sampling Methods; Author: Mathispower4u;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6ApdTvgvOs;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY