Estimated Net Realizable Value Method
Blasto, Inc., operates several mines. At one, a typical batch of ore run through the plant yields three products: lead, copper, and manganese. At the split-off point, the intermediate products cannot be sold without further processing. The lead from a typical batch sells for $40,000 after incurring additional
Required
Use the estimated net realizable value method to allocate the joint processing costs.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 11 Solutions
Gen Combo Fundamentals Of Cost Accounting; Connect Access Card
- Calculating EAC You are evaluating two different silicon wafer milling machines. The Techron I costs $265,000, has a 3-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $41,000 per year. The Techron II costs $330,000, has a 5-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $52,000 per year. For both milling machines, use straight-line depreciation to zero over the project’s life and assume a salvage value of $25,000. If your tax rate is 21 percent and your discount rate is 9 percent, compute the EAC for both machines. Which do you prefer? Why?arrow_forwardDifferential Analysis for Further Processing The management of International Aluminum Co. is considering whether to process aluminum ingot further into rolled aluminum. Rolled aluminum can be sold for $2,300 per ton, and ingot can be sold without further processing for $1,150 per ton. Ingot is produced in batches of 90 tons by smelting 540 tons of bauxite, which costs $103 per ton of bauxite. Rolled aluminum will require additional processing costs of $610 per ton of ingot, and 1.25 tons of ingot will produce 1 ton of rolled aluminum. Required: Question Content Area 1. Prepare a differential analysis as of February 5 to determine whether to sell aluminum ingot (Alternative 1) or process further into rolled aluminum (Alternative 2). If required, do not round interim calculations. If required, use a minus sign to indicate a loss. Differential AnalysisSell Ingot (Alt. 1) or Process Further into Rolled Aluminum (Alt. 2)February 5 Sell Ingot (Alternative 1) ProcessFurther…arrow_forwardDifferential Analysis for Further Processing The management of International Aluminum Co. is considering whether to process aluminum ingot further into rolled aluminum. Rolled aluminum can be sold for $2,400 per ton, and ingot can be sold without further processing for $1,200 per ton. Ingot is produced in batches of 81 tons by smelting 500 tons of bauxite, which costs $108 per ton of bauxite. Rolled aluminum will require additional processing costs of $630 per ton of ingot, and 1.25 tons of ingot will produce 1 ton of rolled aluminum. Required: 1. Prepare a differential analysis as of February 5 to determine whether to sell aluminum ingot (Alternative 1) or process further into rolled aluminum (Alternative 2). If required, do not round interim calculations. If required, use a minus sign to indicate a loss. Differential Analysis Sell Ingot (Alt. 1) or Process Further into Rolled Aluminum (Alt. 2) February 5 Sell Ingot(Alternative 1) ProcessFurther intoRolledAluminum…arrow_forward
- Differential Analysis for Further Processing The management of International Aluminum Co. is considering whether to process aluminum ingot further into rolled aluminum. Rolled aluminum can be sold for $2,200 per ton, and ingot can be sold without further processing for $1,100 per ton. Ingot is produced in batches of 80 tons by smelting 500 tons of bauxite, which costs $105 per ton of bauxite. Rolled aluminum will require additional processing costs of $620 per ton of ingot, and 1.25 tons of ingot will produce 1 ton of rolled aluminum (due to trim losses). Required: 1. Prepare a differential analysis as of February 5 to determine whether to sell aluminum ingot (Alternative 1) or process further into rolled aluminum (Alternative 2). Differential Analysis Sell Ingot (Alt. 1) or Process Further into Rolled Aluminum (Alt. 2) February 5 SellIngot(Alternative 1) ProcessFurther intoRolledAluminum(Alternative 2) DifferentialEffecton Income(Alternative 2) Revenues, per…arrow_forwardNUBD Co. mines three products. Gold ore sells for P1,000,000 per ton, variable costs are P600,000 per ton, and fixed mining costs are P6,000,000. The segment margin for 2021 was P1,200,000. The management of the company was considering dropping the mining of Gold ore. Only one-half of the fixed expenses are direct and would be eliminated if the segment was dropped. If Gold ore were dropped, net income for NUBD wouldarrow_forwardThe table Top Model corp. produces three products, Tic, Tac, Toc. The owner desires to reduce production load to only one product lien due to the prolonged absence of the production manager. Depreciation expense amounts to P600,000 annually. Other fixed operating expenses amount to P660,000 per year. Which product must be retained and what is the opportunity cost of selecting such product line?arrow_forward
- Zambales Mining Co. mines three products. Gold Ore sells for P1,000,000 per ton, variable costs are P600,000 per ton, and fixed mining costs are P5,000,000. The segment margin for 2005 was P(1,000,000). The management of Zambales Mining was considering dropping the mining of Gold Ore. Only one-half of the fixed expenses are direct and would be eliminated if the segment was dropped. If Gold Ore were dropped, net income for Zambales Mining would increase (decrease) by how much? (Note: Precede your answer with negative sign to indicate decrease.)arrow_forwardFull Cost versus Successful Efforts Method. During the current year, The Calgary Oil & Gas Company began an exploration project in Montana. The company had paid $1,500,000 for the drilling rights on a tract of 500 acres of land. The company then spent another $180,000 building roads and containment ponds. The project called for eight exploratory wells to be drilled at an expected cost of $130,000 per well. The first eight wells drilled were found to be "dry" (lacking commercially viable quantities of oil or gas); however, both the ninth and tenth wells drilled contained commercially viable quantities of oil condensate. Consequently, two additional development wells were drilled at a cost of $140,000 per well. For income tax reporting purposes, should the company use the full cost method or the successful efforts method? which method should the company use when reporting its financial results to its shareholders? why?arrow_forwardFull Cost versus Successful Efforts Method. During the current year, The Calgary Oil & Gas Company began an exploration project in Montana. The company had paid $1,500,000 for the drilling rights on a tract of 500 acres of land. The company then spent another $180,000 building roads and containment ponds. The project called for eight exploratory wells to be drilled at an expected cost of $130,000 per well. The first eight wells drilled were found to be “dry” (lacking commercially viable quantities of oil or gas); however, both the ninth and tenth wells drilled contained commercially viable quantities of oil condensate. Consequently, two additional development wells were drilled at a cost of $140,000 per well. Calculate the capitalized cost of Calgary’s oil reserves under (a) the full cost method and (b) the successful efforts methodarrow_forward
- Provide answer in table format B2B Co. is considering the purchase of equipment that would allow the company to add a new product to its line. The equipment is expected to cost $384,000 with a 12-year life and no salvage value. It will be depreciated on a straight-line basis. The company expects to sell 153,600 units of the equipment’s product each year. The expected annual income related to this equipment follows. Sales $ 240,000 Costs Materials, labor, and overhead (except depreciation on new equipment) 128,000 Depreciation on new equipment 32,000 Selling and administrative expenses 24,000 Total costs and expenses 184,000 Pretax income 56,000 Income taxes (20%) 11,200 Net income $ 44,800 1. Compute the payback period.2. Compute the accounting rate of return for this equipment.arrow_forwardAny one of these different product lines can be produced by Bubble Mills, Inc., with the present equipment in one of the divisions. The annual depreciation of the equipment is P6,400; and the annual cost to operate the equipment, regardless of product line manufactured, is P4,600.Product A is expected to yield sales revenue of P71,000 a year with increased costs of production amounting to P42,000. Product B should yield sales revenue of P46,000 a year with increased costs of P15,000. Product C should yield sales revenue of P117,000 with increased costs of P96,000.How much is the sunk costs of the company? choices: P19,600 • P26,000 • P21,400 • P11,000arrow_forwardMerco, Inc .. a machinery builder in Louisville. Kentucky. is considering making an investment of $ 1.250,000 in a complete structura l-bcam-fllbri cation system. The increased productivity resulting from the in stallation of the drilling system is central to the project's justification. Merco estimates the following figures as a basis for calculating productivity:• Increased fabri ca ted-s teel production: 2,000 LOns/year• Average sales price per ton of fabricated steel: $2,566.50• Labor rate:$ I 0.50/hour• Tons of steel produced in a year: LS.000• Cost of steel per ton (2 .205 lb):$ 1.950• Number of workers on layout. hole making. sawing, and material handling: 17• Additional maintenance cost: $128.500/yearWith the cost of steel at $ 1.950 per ton and the direct-labor cost of fabrica ting l lb at 10 cents. the cost of producing a ton of fabricated steel is about $2. 170.50. With a selling price of $2.566.50 per ton. the resulling contribution to overhead and profit becomes $396 per…arrow_forward
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub