The person B and the other residents of the country A filed a case in the federal district court in California alleging that the company MB, a subsidiary of D, joined hands with the state security forces to kidnap, torture, and murder the plaintiff and their relatives. The district court dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The ruling was reversed by the Ninth Circuit. The company D appealed. To find: The effect on a U.S. citizen on the adoption of the plaintiff's argument by the court.

Question

Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc.,develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a patent onit. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brandname “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell the chip to Nitron,Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned,however, that after an initial purchase, Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computermanufacturers in Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it does not want to do this. How can Macrotech,without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica, protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing BusinessInternationally.)

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 11, Problem 4CT

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The person B and the other residents of the country A filed a case in the federal district court in California alleging that the company MB, a subsidiary of D, joined hands with the state security forces to kidnap, torture, and murder the plaintiff and their relatives. The district court dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The ruling was reversed by the Ninth Circuit. The company D appealed.

To find:The effect on a U.S. citizen on the adoption of the plaintiff's argument by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc.,develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a patent onit. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brandname “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell the chip to Nitron,Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned,however, that after an initial purchase, Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computermanufacturers in Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it does not want to do this. How can Macrotech,without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica, protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing BusinessInternationally.)

Given the principles noted in the case, how can companies comment on their positive actions to promote human rights so that consumers will think well of them? Would you propose that a company (a) do nothing, (b) construct a corporate code of ethics, or (c) align itself with some of the universal covenants or compacts prepared by international agencies?

Briefly explain the nature of the impact of State laws/statues and local ordinances on employer and employee relationships and interactions. Explain the following terms: “Pre-empting Action” and “Sovereign Immunity”. Explain how and when the US CONGRESS can abrogate the State’s ‘Sovereign Immunity.’