Macroeconomics
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259915673
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 8DQ
To determine
Relation of say’s law to the classical views.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
5
3. permanent Income Hypothesis
a) suppose that beta=.9 and R= 2222 (that is ~22%). For an individual who acts according to the PIH, will their consumption next period be higher than current consumption or lower?
b) What is the main crucial difference between the Keynesian Consumption function and the consumption function derived from the PIH (or Lifetime Income Hypothesis)?
c) If Present Value of future income stream is 500,000 and a person has a beta of.8, how much will their consumption go up today if only today's income increases by 1000? How much will their consumption increase (approximately) if their income goes up by 1000 in all periods?
ADVANCED ANALYSIS Assume that the consumption schedule for a private closed economy is such that consumption is:
C = 100 + 0.75Y
Assume further that planned investment Ig is independent of the level of real GDP and constant at Ig = 50. Recall also that, in equilibrium, the real output produced (Y) is equal to aggregate expenditures:
Y = C + Ig
Instructions: Enter your answers as whole numbers.a. Calculate the equilibrium level of income or real GDP for this economy.
Equilibrium GDP (Y) = $ .
b. What happens to equilibrium GDP if Ig changes to 60?
Equilibrium GDP (Y) = $ .
What does this outcome reveal about the size of the spending multiplier?
Spending multiplier = .
What would be the level of saving if the real GDP (Y) were at $7 trillion? what is the level of desired investment at this level? What forces are at work at a real GDP of $7 trillion? What will be the equilibrium level of real GDP?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Macroeconomics
Ch. 11.2 - Prob. 1QQCh. 11.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 11.2 - Prob. 3QQCh. 11.2 - Prob. 4QQCh. 11.7 - Prob. 1QQCh. 11.7 - Prob. 2QQCh. 11.7 - Prob. 3QQCh. 11.7 - Prob. 4QQCh. 11 - Prob. 1DQCh. 11 - Prob. 2DQ
Ch. 11 - Prob. 3DQCh. 11 - Prob. 4DQCh. 11 - Prob. 5DQCh. 11 - Prob. 6DQCh. 11 - Prob. 7DQCh. 11 - Prob. 8DQCh. 11 - Prob. 1RQCh. 11 - Prob. 2RQCh. 11 - Prob. 3RQCh. 11 - Prob. 4RQCh. 11 - Prob. 5RQCh. 11 - Prob. 6RQCh. 11 - Prob. 7RQCh. 11 - Prob. 8RQCh. 11 - Prob. 9RQCh. 11 - Prob. 1PCh. 11 - Prob. 2PCh. 11 - Prob. 3PCh. 11 - Prob. 4PCh. 11 - Prob. 5PCh. 11 - Prob. 6PCh. 11 - Prob. 7PCh. 11 - Prob. 8PCh. 11 - Prob. 9PCh. 11 - Prob. 10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 1.) Suppose a closed economy with no government spending or taxing is capable of producing an output of $2050 at full employment. Suppose also that autonomous consumption is $150, intended investment is $60, and the mpc is 0.50. How much additional autonomous spending (for instance, from the government) is needed to move the economy to full employment? 2.)Suppose a closed economy with no government spending or taxing is capable of producing an output of $1200 at full employment. Suppose also that autonomous consumption is $120, intended investment is $70, and the mpc is 0.50. What is the value of output (Y) in equilibrium? 3.)Suppose output and income is equal to 24400, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.80, and autonomous consumption is 650. Calculate total saving for this economy, assuming no public or foreign sector. (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) 4. According to the lectures, which of the following ideas are representative of (neo)classical…arrow_forwardSuppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $110 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardSuppose that consumer spending initially rises by $5 billion for every 1 percent rise in household wealth and that investment spending initially rises by $20 billion for every 1 percentage point fall in the real interest rate. Also assume that the economy�s multiplier is 3. If household wealth falls by 6 percent because of declining house values, and the real interest rate falls by 2 percentage points, in what direction and by how much will the aggregate demand curve initially shift at each price level? The aggregate demand curve will shift_____ by $____ billion. In what direction and by how much will it eventually shift? The aggregate demand curve will shift_____ by $____ billion..arrow_forward
- Given the following information about each economy , either calculate the missing variable or determine that it cannot be calculated . [LO 7.2,7.3] a. If C=\$20.1 billion, I=\$3.5 billion G=\$5.2 billion, and NX=-\$1 billion, what is total income ? b. If total income is $1 trillion G=\$0.3 tr trillion , and C=\$0.5 trillion , what is I? c. If total expenditure is $675 billion, C=\$433 billion , I = $105 billion , and G=\$75 billion , what is NX ? How much are exports ? How much are imports?arrow_forward- If an economy is in equilibrium when national income is $1000, and the level of autonomous expenditure is $600, what is the value of the marginal propensity to withdraw? - Imagine an economy where autonomous expenditure is $50, and the equilibrium level of national income is $125. How much would autonomous expenditure have to increase by to achieve full employment output of $150 ?arrow_forwardExplain why proponents of Keynesian economics believe that it is unlikely for wages and prices to decrease, even if cyclical unemployment is high, and therefore the best remedy to correct a recessionary gap is through stimulating AD. How can just a little bit more extra spending in the economy lead to a much greater impact on real GDP produced? (12.2)arrow_forward
- i need this in word not handwritten Q7. Assume that in 2015, the following prevails in the Republic of Nurd: Y = $200 G = $0 C = $160 T = $0 S = $40 I (planned) = $30 Assume that households consume 80 percent of their in- come, they save 20 percent of their income, MPC = 0.8, and MPS = 0.2. That is, C = 0.8Yd and S = 0.2Yd. Is the economy of Nurd in equilibrium? What is Nurd’s equilibrium level of income? What is likely to happen in the coming months if the government takes no action? 2. If $200 is the “full-employment” level of Y, what fiscal policy might the government follow if its goal is full employment? 3. If the full-employment level of Y is $250, what fiscal policy might the government follow? 4. Suppose Y = $200, C = $160, S = $40, and I = $40. Is Nurd’s economy in equilibrium? 5. Starting with the situation in part d, suppose the government starts spending $30 each year with no taxation and continues to spend $30 every period. If I remains constant, what…arrow_forwardSuppose that the federal government decides to reduce the budget deficit and cuts government purchases by $200 billion and raise personal income taxes by $200 billion. Suppose the MPC = .5. How much and in which direction would the AD curve shift because of the government spending cut? Show your work. How much and in which direction would the AD curve shift because of the tax increase? Show your work. (Note: we know these numbers in parts A & B are not accurate quantitative assessments of the policy actions - but the exercise allows us to think about the mechanisms through which these policy actions will affect the economy.) Using the above numbers, draw the AS-AD diagram and illustrate the short-run impact of the combined policy action assuming the economy begins at potential output. Label the original equilibrium with point "A" and the new short-run equilibrium with point "B". Be sure to label the magnitude of the curve shift. Describe the impact of the policy action on…arrow_forward9. If the MPC is greater than zero but less than one, then we can be sure that when disposable income rises by P1 consumption will: a. not be affected b. will rise by more than P1 c. will rise by less than P1 d. will rise by exactly P1.arrow_forward
- 2. In macroeconomic theory, total or aggregate spending is denoted by A and total or aggregateproduction of income by Y. Which one of the following statements is incorrect? A When A is greater than Y, there is disequilibrium and Y will tend to increase.B When A is equal to Y, there is equilibrium and Y will remain unchanged.C When A is less than Y, there is disequilibrium and Y will decrease.D When A is greater than Y, there is disequilibrium and A will decrease.arrow_forward7 Suppose a closed economy with no government spending which in equilibrium is producing an output and income of 1100. Suppose also that the marginal propensity to consume is 0.80, and that, if at full employment, the economy would produce an output and income of 3850 By how much would the government need to cut taxes (T) to bring the economy to full employment? (round your answer to the nearest whole value)arrow_forwardFocus on the concept of marginal propensity to consume and reflect on which of the following would be implied by a highmarginal propensity to consume.O A small change in consumption when income changesO A high saving rateO A high marginal tax rateO An equilibrium level of income near full employmentO A low marginal propensity to savearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education