Myeconlab With Pearson Etext -- Access Card -- For Microeconomics
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134143071
Author: PINDYCK, Robert, Rubinfeld, Daniel
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 5E
(a)
To determine
Nash equilibria outcome.
(b)
To determine
Maximin strategy outcome.
(c)
To determine
Cooperative outcome.
(d)
To determine
The benefits of cooperative outcome.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make.
Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs.
Will Kaiser cooperate or cheat? Explain.
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs.
4. Suppose you were asked to manage a golf course that was currently charging a uniform price. Would you suggest that the course continue…
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make.
Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs.
What is the monthly gain to Kaiser from cheating? What is the present value of the benefit from cheating for the two months of cheating?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Myeconlab With Pearson Etext -- Access Card -- For Microeconomics
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. What is the monthly cost of punishment to Kaiser? What is the present value of the cost of cheating for the two months of punishment?arrow_forwardSuppose Telkomsel and Indosat are the only two firms in the internet market. They face the following payoff when the want to invest in the research budget: When both companies invest in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 40 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 50 billion. When both of them invest in large budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 20 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 30 billion. When Telkomsel invest in large budget and Indosat in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 30 billion and Indosat will gain zero. When Telkomsel invest in small budget and Indosat in large budget, Telkomsel will gain zero and Indosat will gain Rp 70 billion. a). Draw the payoff matrix b). Is there a Nash Equilibrium for that case? Explain.arrow_forwardTwo cigarette manufacturers repeatedly play the following simultaneous-move billboard advertising game. If both advertise, each earns profits of $0 million. If neither advertises, each earns profits of $10 million. If one advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises earns $20 million and the other firm loses $1 million. If there is a 10 percent chance that the government will ban cigarette sales in any given year, can the firms “collude” by agreeing not to advertise?arrow_forward
- Two men’s clothing stores that compete for most of the market in a small town in Ohio and will choose their weekly advertising levels sequentially. The newspaper advertising department calls the clothing stores in alphabetical order to find out how much advertising each firm wishes to buy. Somehow — and nobody at the newspaper knows exactly how this happens — Arbuckle’s advertising decision “leaks out” to Mr. B’s, which then knows Arbuckle’s advertising decision when it makes its advertising decision for the week. The following payoff table facing the two firms, Arbuckle & Son and Mr. B’s, shows the weekly profit outcomes for the various advertising decision combinations. The payoff table is common knowledge. Use this payoff table to construct the appropriate sequential decision on the blank game tree provided below. If the manager at Arbuckle and Son employs the roll-back method to make the advertising decision for Arbuckle, the likely outcome will be: Multiple Choice $5,000 of…arrow_forwardTwo firms compete in prices in a market for a homogeneous product. In this market there are N > 0 consumers; each buys one unit if the price of the product does not exceed $10, and nothing otherwise. Consumers buy from the firm selling at a lower price. In case both firms charge the same price, assume that N/2 consumers buy from each firm. Assume zero production cost for both firms. Find the Bertrand equilibrium prices for a single-shot game, assuming that the firms choose their prices simultaneouslyarrow_forwardTwo firms are playing an infinitely-repeated prisoner's dilemma pricing game of the following form: Firm 1 Firm 2 Low price High Price Low price 4, 4 20, 0 High price 0, 20 12,12 Consider the decision to cheat ONLY ONCE for a firm in this game against the opponent that is a Tit-for-Tat player. Cheating firm gets an extra in payoffs for the first round, but has to face $0 payoffs for the second round in order to be able to bring the opponent to the collusive outcome again in the third round. What is the minimum rate of return (r) that would make defecting only once? Show your calculations.arrow_forward
- Refer to the normal-form game of price competition in the payoff matrix below Firm B Low Price High Price Firm A Low Price 0, 0 50, −10 High Price −10, 50 20, 20 Suppose the game is infinitely repeated, and the interest rate is 20 percent. Both firms agree to charge a high price, provided no player has charged a low price in the past. This collusive outcome will be implemented with a trigger strategy that states that if any firm cheats, then the agreement is no longer valid, and each firm may make independent decisions. Will the trigger strategy be effective in implementing the collusive agreement? Please explain and show all necessary calculations.arrow_forwardSynergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Synergy's Decision Large Budget Small Budget Dynaco's Decision Large Budget $40 million, $30 million $60 million, $0 Small Budget $0, $30 million $50 million, $40 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy a dominant strategy. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.) True Falsearrow_forwardTwo players, Player 1 and Player 2, are playing a repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Payoffs are described in the following matrix. Answer which statement is correct: Select one: a. A trigger strategy will never support (A,A) as an equilibrium b. A tit-for-tat strategy will never support (A,A) as an equilibrium c. A tit-for-tat strategy will support (A,A) as an equilibrium if δ > 0.7 d. A trigger strategy will support (A,A) as an equilibrium if δ > 0.7arrow_forward
- Explain how beliefs and strategic interaction shape optimal decisions in oligopoly environments. You are the manager of the only firm worldwide that specializes in exporting fish products to Japan. Your firm competes against a handful of Japanese firms that enjoy a significant first-mover advantage. Recently, one of your Japanese customers has called to inform you that the Japanese legislature is considering imposing a quota that would reduce the number of pounds of fish products you are permitted to ship to Japan each year. Your first instinct is to call the trade representative of your country to lobby against the import quota. Is following through with your first instinct necessarily the best decision? Why or why not?arrow_forwardTwo airlines, Dragon Airline and Phoenix Airline, provide direct flight service to a city and tend to compete for the same group of travellers. They are contemplating changing their airfares to earn more profit. If both airlines raise their airfares, Dragon Airline will earn $800m while Phoenix Airline will earn $400m in profit. If both airlines reduce their airfares, Dragon Airline will earn $650m while Phoenix Airline will earn $550m in profit. If Dragon Airline raises its airfare while Phoenix Airline reduces its airfare, Dragon Airline will earn $200m while Phoenix Airline will earn $350m in profit. If Dragon Airline reduces its airfare while Phoenix Airline raises its airfare, Dragon Airline will earn $300m while Phoenix Airline will earn $250m in profit. Construct the payoff matrix in terms of profit for the two pricing strategies. Apply a game theory concept and solve this game using the Nash equilibrium method. Explain how you derive your answers and also whether this game is a…arrow_forwardIn a two-player, one-shot, simultaneous-move game, each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $400. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $200. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $100 and player 2 earns $600. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $600 and player 2 earns $100. a. Write this game in normal form. b. Find each player’s dominant strategy, if it exists. c. Find the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game. d. Rank strategy pairs by aggregate payoff (highest to lowest). e. Can the outcome with the highest aggregate payoff be sustained in equilibrium? Why or why not?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning