EBK STATISTICS FOR MANAGEMENT AND ECONO
10th Edition
ISBN: 9780100546462
Author: KELLER
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13.1, Problem 70E
To determine
Hypothesis test.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
A government study found that people who eat chocolate frequently weighless than people who don’t. Researchers questioned 1000 individuals fromCalifornia between the ages of 20 and 85 about their eating habits, andmeasured their weight and height. On average, participants ate chocolatetwice a week and had a body mass index (BMI) of 28. There was anobserved difference of five to seven pounds in weight between those whoate chocolate five times a week and those who did not eat any chocolate atall, with the chocolate eaters weighing less on average. Frequent chocolateeaters also consumed more calories, on average, than people who consumedless chocolate. Based on this summary, would you recommend thatAmerican’s who do not presently eat chocolate, consider eating chocolateup to five times a week if they want to lose weight? Why or why not?Explain.
Medical tests were conducted to learn about drug-resistant tuberculosis. Of 142 cases tested in New Jersey, 9 were found to be drug-resistant. Of 268 cases tested in Texas, 5 were found to be drug-resistant. Do these data suggest a statistically significant difference between the proportions of drug-resistant cases in the two states? Use a .02 level of significance. What is the -value, and what is your conclusion?
Test statistic =
Previous answer was poorly formated
Chapter 13 Solutions
EBK STATISTICS FOR MANAGEMENT AND ECONO
Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 5ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 6ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 7ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 8ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 9ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 10ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 11ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 12ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 13ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 14E
Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 15ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 16ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 17ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 18ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 19ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 20ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 21ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 22ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 23ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 24ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 25ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 26ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 27ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 28ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 29ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 30ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 31ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 32ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 33ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 34ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 35ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 36ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 37ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 38ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 39ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 40ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 41ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 42ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 43ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 44ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 45ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 46ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 47ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 48ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 49ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 50ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 51ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 52ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 53ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 54ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 55ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 56ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 57ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 58ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 59ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 60ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 61ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 62ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 63ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 64ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 65ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 66ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 67ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 68ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 69ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 70ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 71ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 72ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 73ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 74ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 75ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 76ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 77ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 78ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 79ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 80ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 81ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 82ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 83ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 84ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 85ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 86ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 87ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 88ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 89ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 90ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 91ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 92ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 93ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 94ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 95ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 96ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 97ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 98ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 99ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 100ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 101ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 102ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 103ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 104ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 105ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 106ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 107ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 108ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 109ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 110ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 111ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 112ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 113ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 116ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 117ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 120ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 121ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 122ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 123ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 124ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 125ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 126ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 127ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 128ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 131ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 132ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 133ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 134ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 135ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 136ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 137ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 138ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 139ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 140ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 141ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 142ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 143ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 144ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 145ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 146ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 147ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 148ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 149ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 150ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 151ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 152ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 153ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 154ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 155ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 156ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 157ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 158ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 159ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 160ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 161ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 162ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 165ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 166ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 167ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 168ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 169ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 170ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 171ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 172ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 173ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 174ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 175ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 176ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 177ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 178ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 179ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 180ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 181ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 182ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 183ECh. 13.A - Prob. 1ECh. 13.A - Prob. 2ECh. 13.A - Prob. 3ECh. 13.A - Prob. 4ECh. 13.A - Prob. 5ECh. 13.A - Prob. 6ECh. 13.A - Prob. 7ECh. 13.A - Prob. 8ECh. 13.A - Prob. 9ECh. 13.A - Prob. 10ECh. 13.A - Prob. 11ECh. 13.A - Prob. 12ECh. 13.A - Prob. 13ECh. 13.A - Prob. 14ECh. 13.A - Prob. 15ECh. 13.A - Prob. 16ECh. 13.A - Prob. 17ECh. 13.A - Prob. 18ECh. 13.A - Prob. 19ECh. 13.A - Prob. 20ECh. 13.A - Prob. 21ECh. 13.A - Prob. 22ECh. 13.A - Prob. 23ECh. 13.A - Prob. 24ECh. 13.A - Prob. 25ECh. 13.A - Prob. 26ECh. 13.A - Prob. 27ECh. 13.A - Prob. 28ECh. 13.A - Prob. 29ECh. 13.A - Prob. 30ECh. 13 - Prob. 184CECh. 13 - Prob. 185CECh. 13 - Prob. 186CECh. 13 - Prob. 187CECh. 13 - Prob. 188CECh. 13 - Prob. 189CECh. 13 - Prob. 190CECh. 13 - Prob. 191CECh. 13 - Prob. 192CECh. 13 - Prob. 193CECh. 13 - Prob. 194CECh. 13 - Prob. 195CECh. 13 - Prob. 196CECh. 13 - Prob. 197CECh. 13 - Prob. 198CECh. 13 - Prob. 199CECh. 13 - Prob. 200CECh. 13 - Prob. 201CECh. 13 - Prob. 202CECh. 13 - Prob. 203CECh. 13 - Prob. 204CECh. 13 - Prob. 205CECh. 13 - Prob. 206CECh. 13 - Prob. 207CECh. 13 - Prob. 208CECh. 13 - Prob. 209CECh. 13 - Prob. 210CECh. 13 - Prob. 211CECh. 13 - Prob. 212CECh. 13 - Prob. 213CECh. 13 - Prob. 214CECh. 13 - Prob. 215CECh. 13 - Prob. 216CECh. 13 - Prob. 217CECh. 13 - Prob. 218CECh. 13 - Prob. 219CECh. 13 - Prob. 220CECh. 13 - Prob. 221CECh. 13 - Prob. 222CECh. 13 - Prob. 223CECh. 13 - Prob. 224CECh. 13 - Prob. 225CECh. 13 - Prob. 226CECh. 13 - Prob. 227CECh. 13 - Prob. 228CECh. 13 - Prob. 229CECh. 13 - Prob. 230CECh. 13 - Prob. 231CE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Question 2 In the past, 15% of the mail order solicitations for a certain charity resulted in a financial contribution. A new solicitation letter that has been drafted is sent to a sample of 200 people and 45 responded with a contribution. At the .05 significance level can it be concluded that the new letter is more effective?arrow_forwardIn a study of proctored and nonproctored tests in an online Intermediate Algebra course, researchersobtained the data for test results given below.Group 1 (Proctored): n = 35,30.74=x, s = 12.87Group 2 (Nonproctored): n = 32.62.88=x, s = 22.09 Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that students taking non-proctored test get a higher meanthan those taking proctored tests.arrow_forwardОб. A survey was conducted in which 100 males and, independently, 100 females were asked about their respective methods of transportation to work. Participants were asked whether they typically drive to work, use public transportation, or walk / bicycle. The results are given in the table below. Can the investigators conclude that males differ from females in their work commute tendencies? Show your work. Drive Public Transportation Walk or Bicycle 22 Females 71 Males 76 18 6 (a) Based on the assumption that female and male tendencies are alike, construct a table of expected frequencies. (b) Use a X² test to evaluate the assumption used in part a. Make sure you indicate which test you are using! (c) Interpret the result of part b in terms of the situation of the problem, without using any statistical language.arrow_forward
- A group of health professionals produced a cholesterol drug. To measure the effectiveness of this drug they implemented a program that offered free drugs to people to decrease their cholesterol level. Health professionals also collected a sample of people, who did not have the drug, to act as a control group. Health professionals then measured cholesterol level of all individuals in year 1, before any cholesterol drug were given out, and then measured the same group of individuals again in year 2 after the cholesterol drugs had been administered. Consider the following model to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug on people's cholesterol level: cholie = Bo + 8od2, + B1drugit + Vịt chol= cholestrol of individual i, in year t d2;= binary variable equal to 1 if the time period is year 2, and 0 otherwise drug= binary variable equal to 1 if individual i took the drug in year t, and 0 otherwise V= composite error consisting of the unobserved, time-constant effect (a;) and the idiosyncratic…arrow_forwardA salesman for a new manufacturer of cellular phones claims not only that they cost the retailer less but also that the percentage of defective cellular phones found among his products, ( p1 ), will be no higher than the percentage of defectives found in a competitor's line, ( p2 ). To test this statement, the retailer took a random sample of 185 of the salesman's cellular phones and 150 of the competitor's cellular phones. The retailer found that 22 of the salesman's cellular phones and 11 of the competitor's cellular phones were defective. Does the retailer have enough evidence to reject the salesman's claim? Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Step 1 of 6 : State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.arrow_forwardWith d-statistics 0.354 and du 1.715, What can you conclude about the Durbin Watson Test?arrow_forward
- Benson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality in that the proportion or percentage of defective components may differ among the suppliers. To evaluate the proportion of defective components for the suppliers, Benson has requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The number of defective components and the number of good components found in each shipment are as follows. Supplier Component Defective 17 22 42 Good 483 478 458 (a) Formulate the hypotheses that can be used to test for equal proportions of defective components provided by the three suppliers. OH PA PB = Pc 0 H: All population proportions are not equal. OH PA = P₁ = Pc H: Not all population proportions are equal. OH: All population proportions are not equal. H₂PAP=Pc OH,: Not all population proportions are equal. H₂: PA=PB = Pc (b) Using a 0.05 level of significance, conduct the hypothesis test. Find the…arrow_forwardA salesman for a new manufacturer of cellular phones claims not only that they cost the retailer less but also that the percentage of defective cellular phones found among his products, ( p1 ), will be no higher than the percentage of defectives found in a competitor's line, ( p2 ). To test this statement, the retailer took a random sample of 130 of the salesman's cellular phones and 110 of the competitor's cellular phones. The retailer found that 10 of the salesman's cellular phones and 5 of the competitor's cellular phones were defective. Does the retailer have enough evidence to reject the salesman's claim? Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Step 5 of 6 : Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0 . Round the numerical portion of your answer to three decimal places.arrow_forwardA company is considering an organizational change which entails adopting the use of self-managed work teams which they hope will lead to higher levels of employee satisfaction. In order to assess the attitudes of employees of the company towards this change a sample of 250 employees was selected and asked whether they favor the institution of self-managed teams. Three responses were allowed: favor, neutral or oppose. The observed frequency of the results of the survey are shown below: Opinion Type of Job Favor Neutral Oppose Total Hourly Worker 25 40 35 100 Supervision 45 35 20 100 Manager 20 15 15 50 Total 90 90 70 250 Use this data to test the hypothesis that opinion and type of job are independent at the .025 level.arrow_forward
- 7. Some years ago, a new brand of toothpaste was introduced in the United States. According to its advertisements, studies showed that it had "considerable success" in improving the health of a person's teeth. Suppose that these studies were designed in the following way. The manufacturer of this toothpaste chose three samples of seven people; the first sample agreed to use the new brand, the second sample used Brand A, and the third sample used Brand B. After six months, a dentist examined each person's teeth and scored the health of his or her teeth on a scale of 0 (lowest possible score) to 100 (highest possible score). The results were as follows: New Brand Brand A Brand B 65 58 54 71 60 38 53 63 43 55 90 61 34 95 94 82 89 96 77 62 82 The manufacturer of the new toothpaste says that the average score for the new brand is 2 points higher than for Brand A and 4 points higher than for Brand B. Would you agree with the manufacturer's advertisements? Explain.arrow_forwardA researcher investigated whether a father's level of optimism was predictive of his son's optimism as a young adult. Twenty (20) fathers and sons who agreed to participate in the study were administered a scale measuring their current level of optimism (the scale ranged from 10 to 50), with higher scores indicating greater optimism.arrow_forwardJachuck et al. (1982) report on a drug designed to reduce hypertension (high blood pressure). Such hypotensive drugs are frequently effective but are also linked to side effects like irritability and a decline in energy. Seventy-five patients with mild hypertension were put on hypotensive drugs and their progress was monitored by doctors and spouses. When asked to rate the treated patients as improved, worse, or unchanged, the doctors rated all 75 patients as "improved." Meanwhile, the spouses rated 74 of the 75 patients as "worse." Why might spouses and doctors differ in their opinion about the effect of going on blood pressure medication?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education