EBK MICROECONOMICS
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134458496
Author: List
Publisher: VST
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 10P
(a)
To determine
Profit earned by each country in different cases of quantity supplied.
(b)
To determine
Nash equilibrium for country A and country B.
(c)
To determine
Profit if both countries produce
(d)
To determine
Existence of an incentive to cheat for either country.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Two firms, A and B, are contemplating exporting a local fruit called durian to another
country that has strong demand for durian. If both firms export their durians, each firm
can earn an export revenue of $25 million. If both firms do not export, each firm can earn
a revenue of $12 million from their own domestic market. If one of them exports durians
and the other does not export, the firm that exports durians can earn an export revenue of
$50 million. But the non-exporting firm will earn a revenue of $18 million.
(a)If both firms make a decision simultaneously, construct and analyse a payoff
matrix and solve for the Nash equilibrium. Explain whether this is the prisoner’s
dilemma game.
(b) Suppose Firm A can make a decision before Firm B. Construct and analyse a
decision tree model and determine the payoffs to both firms. Does timing matter
in this game?
Assume that the countries of Irun and Urun are the only two producers of crude oil. Further assume that both countries
have entered into an agreement to maintain certain production levels in order to maximize profits. In the world market for
oil, the demand curve is downward sloping.
Refer to Scenario 16-1. The fact that both countries have colluded to earn higher profit shows their desire to keep
production levels
above the monopoly level of output.
below the Nash equilibrium level of output.
equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output
above the Nash equilibrium level of output.
Colombia and Brazil are two of the major
suppliers of coffee globally, each accounting for
the production of roughly 30 percent of all coffee
consumed. Suppose that Colombia and Brazil
both have the same marginal cost, MCC=20 +
120qc and MCB=20 + 120qB. There are also many
smaller coffee producing nations that operate
competitively. Suppose that after substracting
supply of these smaller nations from global
demand, the remaining demand is P= 720-20Q
which implies that MR=720-4OQ :Determine the
optimal quantity of coffee that Columbia and
Brazil should each produce and the global market
price they should establish if they collude (you can
think of the price being for a 100 kilogram bag of
raw coffee beans).
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Imagine a small town in a remote area where only two residents, Maria and Miguel, own dairies that produce milk that is safe to drink. Each week Maria and Miguel work together to decide how many gallons of milk to produce. They bring milk to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Maria and Miguel can produce as much milk as they want without cost so that the marginal cost is zero. The weekly town demand schedule and total revenue schedule for milk is shown in the table below: Quantity (in gallons) 10 |1 O b. $12 O c. $10 d. S8 2 113 14 לן 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 Price $24 $22 $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 Total Revenue (and Total Profit) $0 $22 $40 $54 $64 $70 $72 $70 $64 $54 $40 $22 $0 Refer to Table 17-3. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Maria and Miguel from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of milk once Maria and Miguel reach a Nash equilibrium? a. $14arrow_forwardConsider a single country and a single good. The demand curve for this good is given by QD = 144 - 4P. Thereare two firms serving the market: Firm A and Firm B, where Firm A has a marginal cost of $20 and Firm B hasa marginal cost of $16. There are no fixed costs incurred by either firm. Firm A produces 16 units and firm B produces 32 units. The equilibrium price is $24. Total Profit for Firm A = $64 Total Profit for Firm B = $256 Assume that these firms compete in Cournot fashion. What is the consumer surplus? Show your work.arrow_forwardSuppose we have two identical firms A and B, selling identical products. They are the only firms in the market and compete by choosing quantities at the same time. The Market demand curve is given by P=477-Q. The only cost is a constant marginal cost of $16. Suppose Firm A produces a quantity of 66 and Firm B produces a quantity of 49. If Firm A decides to increase its quantity by 1 unit while Firm B continues to produce the same 49 units, what is the Marginal Revenue for Firm A from this extra unit? Enter a number only, no $ sign. Don't forget to include the negative sign if revenue decreases.arrow_forward
- Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and that they are the only firms in the market. The average and marginal cost is €60 for each firm. Price is determined by the following demand curve: P = 300 – Q where Q = Q1 + Q2. Suppose firm 1 is the leader and firm 2 is the follower. The output produced by each firm in a Stackelberg equilibrium is A. Firm 1 will produce 60 and Firm 2 will produce 120 B. Firm 1 will produce 80 and Firm 2 will produce 40 C. Firm 1 will produce 120 and Firm 2 will produce 40 D. Firm 1 will produce 120 and Firm 2 will produce 60arrow_forwardThe pie chart to the right illustrates hypothetical data for the market share for the United States automobile market. The percentage of the U.S. market that U.S. auto firms control is nothing%. (Enter your response as an integer.) The image is a pie chart labeled U.S. Automobile Industry Market Share. The pie chart shows the market share of the United States, Japan, Europe, and Korea in the U.S. automobile industry. The market share of the United States is 45%. The market share of Japan is 30%. The market share of Europe is 15%. The market share of Korea is 10%. U.S. Automobile Industry Market Share U.S. 45%Japanese 30%European 15%Korean 10%arrow_forwardVerizon can be viewed as a first mover. Now suppose both ATT and Verizon are considering whether and how to enter a potential market. Market demand is given by the inverse demand function p= 900−q1−q2, where p is the market price margin, q1 is the quantity sold by Verizon and q2 is the quantity sold by ATT. To enter the market, a retailer must build a store. Two types of stores can be built: Small and Large. The Small store requires an investment of $50,000, and it allows the retailer to sell as many as 100 units of the goods at zero marginal cost. Alternatively, they can pay $175,000 to construct a Large store that will allow it to sell any number of units at zero marginal cost. Assume Verizon enters and builds a Large store (i.e. chooses to build a Large store L1 at the first stage.) Calculate Verizon's profit for the following cases: a.) ATT chooses not to enter N at the second stage after viewing Verizon's choice. b.) ATT chooses to build a Small store S at the second stage…arrow_forward
- Verizon can be viewed as a first mover. Now suppose both ATT and Verizon are considering whether and how to enter a potential market. Market demand is given by the inverse demand function p= 900−q1−q2, where p is the market price margin, q1 is the quantity sold by Verizon and q2 is the quantity sold by ATT. To enter the market, a retailer must build a store. Two types of stores can be built: Small and Large. The Small store requires an investment of $50,000, and it allows the retailer to sell as many as 100 units of the goods at zero marginal cost. Alternatively, they can pay $175,000 to construct a Large store that will allow it to sell any number of units at zero marginal cost. Assume Verizon stays out of the potential market (i.e. chooses not to enter N1 at the first stage, q1= 0). Calculate Verizon's profit for the following cases: a.) ATT chooses not to enter N at the second stage after viewing Verizon's choice. b.) ATT chooses to build a Small store S at the second stage…arrow_forwardWe typically focus on firms from well-developed economies entering markets of less developed economies. Do firms from less developed economies have a chance of success if they enter developed markets, such as the United States? What competitive advantage could a firm from a less developed economy rely on in entering developed markets? What would likely be the best entry mode?arrow_forwardYou work for a marketing firm that has just landed a contract with Run-of-the-Mills to help them promote three of their products: guppy gummies, frizzles, and kipples. All of these products have been on the market for some time, but, to entice better sales, Run-of-the-Mills wants to try a new advertisement that will market two of the products that consumers will likely consume together. As a former economics student, you know that complements are typically consumed together while substitutes can take the place of other goods. Run-of-the-Mills provides your marketing firm with the following data: When the price of guppy gummies decreases by 5%, the quantity of frizzles sold decreases by 4% and the quantity of kipples sold increases by 6%. Your job is to use the cross-price elasticity between guppy gummies and the other goods to determine which goods your marketing firm should advertise together. Relative to Guppy Gummies Recommend Marketing with Guppy Gummies Cross-Price…arrow_forward
- In some industries, securing the adoption of an industry standard that is favourable to one’s own product is an enormous advantage. It can involve marketing efforts that grow more productive the larger the product’s market share. Microsoft’s Windows is an excellent example.2 The more customers adopt Windows, the more applications are introduced by independent software developers, and the more applications that are introduced the greater the chance for further adoptions. With other products the market can quickly exhibit diminishing returns to promotional expenditure, as it becomes saturated. However, with the adoption of new industry standards, or a new technology, increasing returns can persist.3 Microsoft is therefore willing to spend huge amounts on promotion and marketing to gain this advantage and dominate the industry. Many would claim that this is a restrictive practice, and that this has justified the recent anti-trust suit against the company. The competitive aspects of this…arrow_forwardConsider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are shown in the image attached. a) What is the dominant strategy for the United States? For Mexico? Explain. b) Define Nash equilibrium. What is the Nash equilibrium for trade policy? c) In 1993, the U.S. Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. Do the perceived payoffs shown here justify this approach to trade policy? Explain.arrow_forwardConsider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are shown in the following payoff matrix: United States' Decision Low Tariffs High Tariffs Mexico's Decision Low Tariffs $28 billion, $28 billion $20 billion, $30 billion High Tariffs $30 billion, $20 billion $25 billion, $25 billion The dominant strategy for the United States is always to choose tariffs. The dominant strategy for Mexico is always to choose tariffs. True or False: The Nash equilibrium outcome for trade policy is for the United States to have low tariffs and Mexico to have high tariffs. True False In 1993, the U.S. Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. True or False: Given the trade strategy decisions in the table, the United States is better off and…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
