Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (6th Edition)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134304755
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 14.2.8PA
To determine
Whether the students' strategy was unlikely to work in this game.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Two competing firms must choose their quantity of production simultaneously. Each firm can choose either a High quantity of 3 or a Low quantity of 2. The price for both firms is 9-Q, where Q is the sum of both their quantities. Costs are zero; the profit is simply price times quantity. For example, if firm 1 chooses High and firm 2 chooses Low, then price is 9-(3+2)=4; payoff for firm 1 is 12 while payoff for firm 2 is 8.
What is the unique Nash equilibrium?
(Firm 1's strategy will be written before firm 2's.)
You work for a marketing firm that has just landed a contract with Run-of-the-Mills to help them promote three of their products: splishy splashers, raskels, and kipples. All of these products have been on the market for some time, but, to entice better sales, Run-of-the-Mills wants to try a new advertisement that will market two of the products that consumers will likely consume together. As a former economics student, you know that complements are typically consumed together while substitutes can take the place of other goods.
Run-of-the-Mills provides your marketing firm with the following data: When the price of splishy splashers decreases by 8%, the quantity of raskels sold increases by 6% and the quantity of kipples sold decreases by 8%. Your job is to use the cross-price elasticity between splishy splashers and the other goods to determine which goods your marketing firm should advertise together.
Complete the first column of the following table by computing the cross-price…
Consider two oligopolists, each choosing between a “high” and a “low” level of production. Given their choices of how much to produce, their profits will be as follows: Explain how firm B will reason that it makes sense to produce the high amount, regardless of what firm A chooses. Then explain how firm A will reason that it makes sense to produce the high amount, regardless of what firm B chooses. How might collusion assist the two firms in this case?
Chapter 14 Solutions
Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (6th Edition)
Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.1.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.3RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.4RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.7PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.8PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.9PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.10PA
Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.2.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.3RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.4RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.7PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.8PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.9PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.10PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.11PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.12PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.13PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.14PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.15PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.16PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.17PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.18PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.19PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.20PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.3PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.4PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.3PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.4PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.7PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.8PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- American Airlines and Braniff Airways are the two airlines operating flights from your region. Suppose that each company can charge either a high price for tickets or a low price. First, American Airlines will choose the price level. Following this, Braniff Airways will observe its competitor’s decision and choose the price level for its tickets. If both of the companies choose High, they earn $25,000 each. If they both choose Low, they earn $18,000 each. If the companies choose different levels of prices, the one choosing the high price will earn $15,000 and the one choosing Low will earn $30,000. a) Draw the game three. b) Solve the game by using backwards induction. c) If Braniff Airlines makes a promise to choose High if American Airlines chooses High, should American Airlines trust this promise? Explain.arrow_forwardNash equilibrium can be defined as the competitive outcome where _____A. all firms set prices equal to average cost and all firms make economic profit.B. each firm sets a price equal to marginal cost and each firm makeseconomic profit.C. each firm sets a price higher than marginal cost and each firm makeseconomic profit.D. each firm sets a price lower than marginal cost and each firm makeseconomic profit.E. firms set a price lower than average cost and all firms make economic profit.arrow_forwardFor the questions that ask you to draw the games, you can either draw them on the computer, or draw them by hand and then insert a picture. The table function in word works well for drawing these games, and was what I used. Part 1: Dominant and dominated strategies In the following games, identify any dominant or dominated strategies. Specify whether the strategy is strictly or weakly dominant/dominated. Then use dominant and/or dominated strategies to provide the solution to the game. Player 2 Player 1 Left Right Up 4, 1 2, 4 Down 1, 2 3, 3 Player 2 Player 1 Left Center Right Up 7, 3 8, 6 4, 9 Middle 1, 8 5, 7 3, 4 Down 2, 1 9, 5 6, 2 Player 2 Player 1 Left Center Right Up 2, 1 3, 6 7, 5 Middle 0, 8 7, 7 3, 5 Down 2, 2 4, 1 3, 1 Assume there is some deadly airborne disease. Assume that…arrow_forward
- Two players bargain over $20. Player 1 first proposes a split of(n, 20 - n), where n is an integer in {0, 1, ..., 20}. Player 2 can either accept or reject this proposal. If player accepts it, player 1 obtains $n and player 2 obtains $(20 - n). If player 2 rejects it, the money is taken away from them and both players will get $0. Find one Nash equilibrium that is NOT a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Explain why it is a Nash equilibrium and why it is not subgame perfect.arrow_forwardSuppose two firms, A and B, have a cost function of ?(??) = 30??, for ? = ?, ?. The inverse demand for the market is given by ? = 120 − ?, where Q represents the total quantity in the market, ? = ?? + ??. 1. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a Nash Equilibrium of the Cournot Model. 2. Let Firm A be the first mover, and Firm B be the second mover. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a SPNE of the Stackelberg Model.arrow_forward) The following provides information for a game. Firm A Firm B Low Price High Price Low Price (2, 2) (10, −8) High Price (−8, 10) (15, 15) Suppose the game is infinitely repeated, and the interest rate is 10 percent. The firms are allowed to collude and make joint decisions. Both firms agree to charge a high price, provided no player has charged a low price in the past. This collusive outcome will be implemented with a trigger strategy that states that if any firm cheats (by charging a low price), then the agreement is no longer valid and each firm may make their own independent decisions. Will the trigger strategy be effective in implementing the collusive agreement? Please explain and show all necessary calculationsarrow_forward
- Imagine a small town with three car repair shops competing for a limited number of customers. Explain why the three shops working together to keep their prices high is unlikely to be a Nash equilibrium.arrow_forwardQ13 George and Jerry are competitors in a local market. Each is trying to decide if it is better to advertise on TV, on radio, or not at all. If they both advertise on TV, each will earn a profit of €3,000. If they both advertise on radio, each will earn a profit of €5,000. If neither advertises at all, each will earn a profit of €10,000. If one advertises on TV and the other advertises on radio, then the one advertising on TV will earn €4,000 and the other will earn €2,000. If one advertises on TV and the other does not advertise, then the one advertising on TV will earn €8,000 and the other will earn €5,000. If one advertises on radio and the other does not advertise, then the one advertising on radio will earn €9,000 and the other will earn €6,000. If both follow their dominant strategy, then George will: (a) advertise on TV and earn €3,000; (b) advertise on radio and earn €5,000; (c) advertise on TV and earn €8,000; (d) not advertise and earn €10,000;arrow_forwardIn 1896, Colgate dental cream was introduced in tubes similar to those we use now. Today, the Colgate-Palmolive Company’s brand of toothpaste is the best-selling toothpaste in the world (ahead of the Crest brand marketed by Procter & Gamble, which was introduced in 1955). While Colgate and Crest enjoy the lion’s share of the toothpaste market, if you view the oral care shelf at your local drugstore or supermarket, you will find over a hundred different varieties of toothpaste. Colgate alone sells over 40 different varieties that are marketed under names ranging from Shrek Bubble Fruit to Colgate Total Advanced Whitening. The high level of product differentiation in the toothpaste market stems from firms introducing new varieties in an attempt to boost their economic profits. In environments where makers of other brands (such as Crest) can easily enter profitable segments of the market, a profitable strategy is to attempt to quickly cover that segment (introducing Shrek Bubble Fruit…arrow_forward
- In 1896, Colgate dental cream was introduced in tubes similar to those we use now. Today, the Colgate-Palmolive Company’s brand of toothpaste is the best-selling toothpaste in the world (ahead of the Crest brand marketed by Procter & Gamble, which was introduced in 1955). While Colgate and Crest enjoy the lion’s share of the toothpaste market, if you view the oral care shelf at your local drugstore or supermarket, you will find over a hundred different varieties of toothpaste. Colgate alone sells over 40 different varieties that are marketed under names ranging from Shrek Bubble Fruit to Colgate Total Advanced Whitening. The high level of product differentiation in the toothpaste market stems from firms introducing new varieties in an attempt to boost their economic profits. In environments where makers of other brands (such as Crest) can easily enter profitable segments of the market, a profitable strategy is to attempt to quickly cover that segment (introducing Shrek Bubble…arrow_forwardSometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Firm B colludes with Firm A Firm B cheats by selling more output Firm A colludes with Firm B A gets $1,000, B gets $100 A gets $800, B gets $200 Firm A cheats by selling more output A gets $1,050, B gets $50 A gets $500, B gets $20 Table10.4 Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?arrow_forwardUse the figures below to answer the following question. The figure on the left is the payoff matrix that represents the invisible hand game where two farmers decide which crop to plant, with the Nash equilibrium circled. The figure on the right illustrates the gains from trade realised in a perfectly competitive market. Discuss the common idea that is implied by both the invisible hand game and the perfectly competitive market.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education