EBK CONTEMPORARY ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134123950
Author: Park
Publisher: PEARSON CUSTOM PUB.(CONSIGNMENT)
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 2ST
a:
To determine
Assumption.
b:
To determine
Selection fo the project.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Greenleaf Company is considering the purchase of a new set of air-electric quill units to replace an obsolete machine. The current machine has a market value of zero; however, it is in good working order, and it will last physically for at least an additional five years. The new quill units will perform the operation with so much more efficiency that the firm's engineers estimate that labor, material, and other direct costs will be reduced by $3,000 a year if the units are installed. The new set of quill units costs $10,000 delivered and installed, and its economic life is estimated to be five years with zero salvage value. The firm's MARR is 10%.(a) What is the investment required to keep the old machine?(b) Compute the cash flow to use in the analysis of each option.(c) If the firm uses the internal-rate-of-return criterion, would the analysis indicate that the firm should buy the new machine?
A firm owns a drilling equipment that it is contemplating replacing. It is believed that P1,500,000 could be obtained for the old equipment if it were sold now, but it can be productively used for four more years at which time its market value will be zero. The equipment has an operating and maintenance of P600,000 per year.
The firm can purchase a new machine, with the same functionality as the current machine, for P5,500,000. In four years the market value of the new machine is estimated to be P2,275,000. Annual operating and maintenance costs will be P1,850,000 per year.
Should the old drilling equipment be replaced using a before-tax MARR of 15% and a study period of four years?
Acme-Denver Corporation is considering the replacement of an old, relatively inefficient surface-grinder machine that was purchased seven years ago at a cost of $12,000. The machine had an original expected life of 10 years and a zero estimated salvage value at the end of that period. The current market value of the machine is $2,000. The divisional manager reports that a new machine can be bought and installed for $14,000. Over its five-year life, this machine will expand sales from $10,000 to $12,500 a year and, furthermore, will reduce labor and raw materials usage sufficiently to cut annual operating costs from $7,000 to $5,000. The new machine has an estimated salvage value of $4,000 at the end of its five-year life. The firm's MARR is 12%.(a) Should the new machine be purchased now?(b) What current market value of the new machine would make the two options equal?
Chapter 14 Solutions
EBK CONTEMPORARY ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
Ch. 14 - Prob. 1PCh. 14 - Prob. 2PCh. 14 - Prob. 3PCh. 14 - Prob. 4PCh. 14 - Prob. 5PCh. 14 - Prob. 6PCh. 14 - Prob. 7PCh. 14 - Prob. 8PCh. 14 - Prob. 9PCh. 14 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 14 - Prob. 11PCh. 14 - Prob. 12PCh. 14 - Prob. 13PCh. 14 - Prob. 14PCh. 14 - Prob. 15PCh. 14 - Prob. 16PCh. 14 - Prob. 17PCh. 14 - Prob. 18PCh. 14 - Prob. 19PCh. 14 - Prob. 20PCh. 14 - Prob. 21PCh. 14 - Prob. 22PCh. 14 - Prob. 23PCh. 14 - Prob. 24PCh. 14 - Prob. 25PCh. 14 - Prob. 26PCh. 14 - Prob. 27PCh. 14 - Prob. 28PCh. 14 - Prob. 29PCh. 14 - Prob. 30PCh. 14 - Prob. 31PCh. 14 - Prob. 32PCh. 14 - Prob. 33PCh. 14 - Prob. 34PCh. 14 - Prob. 35PCh. 14 - Prob. 36PCh. 14 - Prob. 37PCh. 14 - Prob. 38PCh. 14 - Prob. 39PCh. 14 - Prob. 40PCh. 14 - Prob. 41PCh. 14 - Prob. 42PCh. 14 - Prob. 43PCh. 14 - Prob. 44PCh. 14 - Prob. 45PCh. 14 - Prob. 46PCh. 14 - Prob. 47PCh. 14 - Prob. 48PCh. 14 - Prob. 49PCh. 14 - Prob. 1STCh. 14 - Prob. 2STCh. 14 - Prob. 3ST
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Market Top Investors, Incorporated, is considering the purchase of a $345, 000 computer with an economic life of five years. The computer will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight - line method, at which time it will be worth $78, 000. The computer will replace two office employees whose combined annual salaries are $89, 000. The machine will also immediately lower the firm's required net working capital by $78, 000. This amount of net working capital will need to be replaced once the machine is sold. The corporate tax rate is 23 percent. The appropriate discount rate is 11 percent. Calculate the NPV of this projectarrow_forwardGordon Inc. has a number of copiers that were bought four years ago for $20,000. Currently maintenance costs $2,000 a year, but the maintenance agreement expires at the end of two years and thereafter the annual maintenance charge will rise to $8,000. The machines have a current resale value of $8,000, but at the end of year 2 their value will have fallen to $3,500. By the end of year 6 the machines will be valueless and would be scrapped. Gordon is considering replacing the copiers with new machines that would do essentially the same job. These machines cost $25,000, and the company can take out an eight-year maintenance contract for $1,000 a year. The machines have no value by the end of the eight years and would be scrapped. Both machines are depreciated by using seven-year MACRS, and the tax rate is 35 percent. Assume for simplicity that the inflation rate is zero. The real cost of capital is 7 percent. When should Gordon replace its copiers, now, the end of year 2, or the end of…arrow_forwardA radiology clinic is considering buying a new $700,000 x-ray machine, which will have no salvage value after installation because the cost of removal will be approximately equal to its sales value. Maintenance is estimated at $24,000 per year as long as the machine is owned. After 10 years the x-ray source will be depleted and the machine must be scrapped. Which of the following represents the most economic life of this x-ray machine? Solve a.One year, because it will have no salvage after installation b. Five years, because the maintenance costs are constant c. Ten years, because maintenance costs don't increase d. Cannot be determined from the information given.arrow_forward
- An auto-part manufacturer is faced with the prospect of replacing its old robot, which has been used in stamping operation for 10 years. This particular robot was installed at a cost of $100,000 and was assumed to have a 15-year life with no appreciable salvage value. The current annual operating costs are $20,000 for this old robot, and these costs are presumed to be the same for the rest of its life. A sales representative from Advanced Robotic Systems is trying to sell this company a new-highly efficient robot. The new system would require an investment of $200,000 for installation. The economic life of this new robot is estimated to be IO years with a salvage value of $18,000, and the robot will reduce annual operating costs to $5,000. No detailed agreement has been made with the sales representative about the disposal of the old robot. Determine therange of resale values associated with the old system that would justify installation of the new system at a MARR of 14%.arrow_forwardReplacement versus expansion cash flows- Tesla Systems has estimated the cash flows over the five-year lives of a project that will install new equipment to replace old equipment. If the firm makes this investment, it will sell the old equipment and receive after-tax proceeds of $1,551,000. If the firm decides not to undertake this project, the old equipment will remain in service and generate the cash flows listed in years 1 through 5, and it will have no value after five years. These cash flows are summarized in the following table: New equipment Old equipmentNew equipment cost -4,645,000 Year Operating cash flows 1 551,000 372,000 2 931,000 372,000 3 1,344,000 372,000 4 2,221,000 372,000 5 3,399,000 372,000 New Equipment Old Equipment New Equipment Cost -$4,645,000 Year Operating Cash Flows 1 $551,000 $372,000 2 $931,000 $372,000 3 $1,344,000 $372,000 4 $2,221,000 $372,000 5 $3,399,000…arrow_forwardA company is currently producing chemical compounds by a process installed 10 years ago at a cost of $100,000. It was assumed that the process would have a 20-year life with a zero salvage value. The current market value of the equipment, however, is $60,000, and the initial estimate of its economic life is still good. The annual operating costs associated with this process are $18,000. A sales representative from U.S. Instrument Company is trying to sell a new chemical compound-making process to the company. This new process will cost $200,000 have a service life of IO years with a salvage value of $20,000, and reduce annual operating costs to $4,000. Assuming the company desires a return of 12% on all investments, should it invest in the new process?arrow_forward
- You have been asked to evaluate the profitability of building a new distribution center under the following conditions:I. The proposal is for a distribution center costing $1,500,000. The facility has an expected useful life of 35 years and a net salvage value (net proceeds from its sale after tax adjustments) of $225,000.II. Annual savings (due to a better strategic location) of $227,000 are expected, annual maintenance and administrative costs will be $114,000, and annual income taxes are $43,000. Suppose that the firm's MARR is 12%. Determine the net present worth of the investment.arrow_forwardYour company is contemplating the purchase of a large stamping machine. The machine will cost $180,000. With additional transportation and installation costs of $5,000 and $10,000, respectively, the cost basis for depreciation purposes is $195,000. Its MV at the end of five years is estimated as $40,000. The IRS has assured you that this machine will fall under a three-year MACRS class life category. The justifications for this machine include $40,000 savings per year in labor and $30,000 savings per year in reduced materials. The before-tax MARR is 20% per year, and the effective income tax rate is 40%. Use this information to solve, The taxable income for year three is most nearly (a) $5,010 (b) $16,450 (c) $28,880 (d) $41,120 (e) $70,000.arrow_forward. A machine costs $ 10,000 and is expected to be scrapped for $ 1,500 in the moment he retires. Operating expenses for the first year are expected to be $ 3,500 and increasing by $ 400 as a result of the impairment; and operating income Estimated $ 20,000 If the MARR is 15%, determine the economic life of the machine.arrow_forward
- Consider a machine that costs $40,000 and has a six-year useful life. At the end of the six years, it can be sold for $5,000 after all tax adjustments have been factored in. If the firm could earn an after-tax revenue of $5400 per year with this machine, should it be purchased at an interest rate of 13%?arrow_forwardAtlantic Control Company purchased a machine two years ago at a cost of $70,000. At that time, the machine’s expected economic life was six years and its salvage value at the end of its life was estimated to be $10,000. It is being depreciated using the straight line method so that its book value at the end of six years is $10,000. In four years, however, the old machine will have a market value of $0. A new machine can be purchased for $80,000, including shipping and installation costs. The new machine has an economic life estimated to be four years. Three-year MACRS depreciation will be used. During its four-year life, the new machine will reduce cash operating expenses by $20,000 per year. Sales are not expected to change. But the new machine will require net working capital to be increased by $4,000. At the end of its useful life, the machine is estimated to have a market value of $2,500. What is the NPV of this project? Should Atlantic replace the old machine (assuming a…arrow_forwardBurlington Motor Carriers, a trucking company, is considering the installation of a two-way mobile satellite messaging service on its 2,000 trucks. From tests done last year on 120 trucks, the company found that satellite messaging could cut 60% of its $5 million bill for long-distance communications with truck drivers. More importantly, the drivers who used this system reduced the number of "deadhead" miles-those driven without paying loads-by 0.5%. Applying that improvement to all 230 million miles covered by the Burlington fleet each year would produce an extra $1.25 million in savings. Equipping all 2,000 trucks with the satellite hookup will require an investment of $8 million and the construction of a message-relaying system costing $2 million. The equipment and onboard devices will have a service life of eight years and negligible salvage value; they will be depreciated under the five-year MACRS class. Burlington's marginal tax rate is about 38%, and its required minimum…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning