EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 15.3P
a
To determine
Effort chosen by C.
c)
To determine
Minimum bonus to be paid and fixed salary in addition for acceptance of contract.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Let vij be bidder i's valuation for object j, where i in {1,2,3} and j in {1,2}. Bidder i knows its valuation vi; but other bidders only know that vi; is drawn uniformly from [0, 100]. If bidder i wins object 1 at price p1 and object 2 at price p2, bidder i's payoff is v;1 If bidder i wins only object j at price p;, his payoff is vij – Pj. If bidder i does not win any object, his payoff is 0.
The auction proceeds as follows. The initial prices are zero for both objects. All bidders sit in front of their computers and observe the prices for both items in real-time. Initially, all bidders are invited to enter the bidding race for both items. At any moment in time, each bidder has the option to withdraw from the bidding race for either object or both. If a bidder withdraws from the bidding for one object, he can no longer get back to the bidding for that object, but he can stay in the bidding race for the other object if he hasn't withdrawn from it previously. The price for an object…
Let vij be bidder i's valuation for object j, where i in {1,2,3} and j in {1,2}. Bidder i knows its valuation vi; but other bidders only know that vi; is drawn uniformly from [0, 100]. If bidder i wins object 1 at price p1 and object 2 at price p2, bidder i's payoff is v;1 If bidder i wins only object j at price p;, his payoff is vij – Pj. If bidder i does not win any object, his payoff is 0.
The auction proceeds as follows. The initial prices are zero for both objects. All bidders sit in front of their computers and observe the prices for both items in real-time. Initially, all bidders are invited to enter the bidding race for both items. At any moment in time, each bidder has the option to withdraw from the bidding race for either object or both. If a bidder withdraws from the bidding for one object, he can no longer get back to the bidding for that object, but he can stay in the bidding race for the other object if he hasn't withdrawn from it previously. The price for an object…
Now suppose agent C can produce private information about the true realization x at t=1 at the cost γ=4. Suppose lA=lB=φA=φB=1 and x is either 40 or 100 with equal probability and w=70. - At t=1, agent B owns the bond. What is the maximum amount LB that agent B can borrow with probability 1?- At t=0, what amount LA can agent A borrow from agent B in a repo trade at t=0 and what is the haircut in equilibrium?
Chapter 15 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 1TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 2TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 1MQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 2.1MQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 1.1TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 2.1TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 1.2TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 2.2TTACh. 15.3 - Prob. 1MQ
Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 2MQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 1MQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 2.1MQCh. 15.5 - Prob. 1TTACh. 15.5 - Prob. 2TTACh. 15.5 - Prob. 1MQCh. 15.5 - Prob. 2MQCh. 15 - Prob. 1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 3RQCh. 15 - Prob. 4RQCh. 15 - Prob. 5RQCh. 15 - Prob. 6RQCh. 15 - Prob. 7RQCh. 15 - Prob. 8RQCh. 15 - Prob. 9RQCh. 15 - Prob. 10RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.1PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.2PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.3PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.4PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.5PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.6PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.7PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.8PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.9PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Look again at Figure 21.12. It appears that the investor in panel b can't lose and the investor in panel a can' t win. Is that correct? Note: The solution should not be hand written.arrow_forwardConsider a first-price, sealed-bid auction, and suppose there are only three feasible bids: A bidder can bid 1, 2, or 3. The payoff to a losing bidder is zero. The payoff to a winning bidder equals his valuation minus the price paid (which, by the rules of the auction, is his bid). What is private information to a bidder is how much the item is worth to him; hence, a bidder’s type is his valuation. Assume that there are only two valuations, which we’ll denote L and H, where H > 3 > L > 2. Assume also that each bidder has probability .75 of having a high valuation, H. The Bayesian game is then structured as follows: First, Nature chooses the two bidders’ valuations. Second, each bidder learns his valuation, but does not learn the valuation of the other bidder. Third, the two bidders simultaneously submit bids. A strategy for a bidder is a pair of actions: what to bid when he has a high valuation and what to bid when he has a low valuation. a. Derive the conditions on H and L…arrow_forwardAmy's utility depends upon her income, w. Her utility function is √w. She receives a prize that depends on the roll of a dice. If she rolls a 3 or 4 or 6, she will receive $400. Otherwise, if she rolls a 1 or 2 or 5, she will receive $100.4. A competitive market offers insurance at a fair premium against the risk of rolling a 1, 2 or 5. What is the utility of Amy if she buys insurance (round at the second decimal)?5. How much money beyond the fair premium is Amy willing to pay to get rid of risk entirely?arrow_forward
- Consider a medieval Italian merchant who is a risk averse expected utility maximiser. Their wealth will beequal to y if their ship returns safely from Asia loaded with the finest silk. If the ship sinks, their incomewill be y − L. The chance of a safe return is 50%. Now suppose that there are two identical merchants, A and B, who are both risk averse expected utilitymaximisers with utility of income given by u(y) = ln y. The income of each merchant will be 8 if theirown ship returns and 2 if it sinks. As previously, the probability of a safe return is 50% for each ship.However, with probability p ≤ 1/2 both ships will return safely. With the same probability p both willsink. Finally, with the remaining probability, only one ship will return safely.(iv) Compute the increase in the utility of each merchant that they could achieve from pooling theirincomes (as a function of p). How does the benefit of pooling depend on the probability p? Explainintuitively why this is the case.arrow_forwardConsider the following compound lottery, described in words: "The probability that the price of copper increases tomorrow is objectively determined to be 0.5. If it increases, then tomorrow I will flip a coin to determine a monetary payout that you will receive: if the flip is Heads, you win $100, while if it is Tails, you win $50. If it does not increase, then I will roll a 10-sided die (assume each side is equally likely to be rolled). If the die roll is a 4 or lower, you will win $100. If it is a 5, then you will win $200, and if it is a 6 or greater, you will win $50." Fill in the blanks below for the reduced lottery that corresponds to this compound lottery (write in decimals). R= ( , $50; , $100; , $200)arrow_forwardSuppose that Alex wants to purchase a boat from Rosette. Alex is willing to pay up to $18,000, while Rosette is not willing to accept any offer below $15,000. Assume that there are a finite number of negotiating rounds. 1.If the discount factors for Rosette and Alex are δR = 0.05 and δA = 0.05, respectively, how much should Alex offer for the boat? 2.Suppose that Rosette’s discount factor is δR = 0.20, and Alex’s discount factor is δA =0.15. 3.How much should Alex offer for the boat? How does this offer differ from your r to part a, and why?arrow_forward
- In a principal-agent problem, if the contract implies that the more risk-averse agent will bear less risk, we can say that this contract exhibits A.risk sharing is not optimal because the less risk-averse (or risk-neutral) agent should bear none of the risk. B.efficiency in risk-bearing. C.risk sharing is not optimal because risk-neutral agents should face no risk. D.risk sharing is not optimal because all risk should be transferred to the most risk-averse agent.arrow_forward5) Three legislators are set to vote on a bill to raise the salary of legislators. The majority wins, so all three will receive the raise if at least two of them vote in favor of the bill. The raise is valued at R by each legislator. Voting in favor of the bill comes with political backlash from constituents, though, even if the bill fails. Let C be the cost of backlash for anyone voting in favor of the bill. Finally, suppose that 0 < C < R. There are four possible payoffs for each legislator: 0: if they vote against the bill and at least one other legislator votes against it (so the bill fails) R: if they vote against the bill and the others vote for the bill (so the bill passes) -C: if they vote for the bill and no one else votes for the bill (so the bill fails) R-C: if they vote for the bill and at least one other legislator votes for it (so the bill passes). The three legislators are named X, Y, and Z, and voting happens sequentially and orally. So X announces their vote (to…arrow_forwardGive an example, real or imaginary, of an adverse selection problem. Your example must clearly point out: what information is private/asymmetric (is it an attribute or an action?) which party has the private information when does the information asymmetry arise (before or after the contract/transaction?) what is the likely outcome and in which way it can be inefficientarrow_forward
- Choice under uncertainty. Consider a coin-toss game in which the player gets $30 if they win, and $5 if they lose. The probability of winning is 50%. (a) Alan is (just) willing to pay $15 to play this game. What is Alan’s attitude to risk? Show your work. (b) Assume a market with many identical Alans, who are all forced to pay $15 to play this coin-toss game. An insurer offers an insurance policy to protect the Alans from the risk. What would be the fair (zero profit) premium on this policy? can you help me for par (b) plase?arrow_forwardConsider the St. Petersburg Paradox problem first discussed by Daniel Bernoulli in 1738. The game consists of tossing a coin. The player gets a payoff of 2^n where n is the number of times the coin is tossed to get the first head. So, if the sequence of tosses yields TTTH, you get a payoff of 2^4 this payoff occurs with probability (1/2^4). Compute the expected value of playing this game. Next, assume that utility U is a function of wealth X given by U = X.5 and that X = $1,000,000. In this part of the question, assume that the game ends if the first head has not occurred after 40 tosses of the coin. In that case, the payoff is 240 and the game is over. What is the expected payout of this game? Finally, what is the most you would pay to play the game if you require that your expected utility after playing the game must be equal to your utility before playing the game? Use the Goal Seek function (found in Data, What-If Analysis) in Excel.arrow_forwardV7 Consider a owner-manager problem in which πgross = 2e + ε [manager has control over e, ε are factors outside of manager’s control, ε~N(0,σ2 )] The owner pays the manager a salary of s out of the gross profits. Manager’s cost of effort = e2 /2. Manager has constant risk aversion utility function. σ 2 = 4 A = 1 a) What is the first-best outcome for manager utility, manager effort, and net profits of the owner? b) Now consider that the owner cannot observe manager effort and offers a salary tied to gross profits: s(πgross) = a + b πgross What is the second-best outcome for manager utility, manager effort, and net profits of the owner?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
