The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution. Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

100%

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

We have studied how the six major primate groups evolved, with the most recent group being the hominins.The hominins branched off from main ape group around 7 million years ago.According to our lessons explain your reasoning as to whether there is a missing link,or one single specimen that embodies both ape and hominin traits, that serves as a transition between what is clearly ape and what is clearly hominin?What have you found most interesting about the beginning of hominin evolution and why?

Changes in the traits of the fossils studied are consistent with what is expected to be favored by natural selection, given environmental changes during that time. Thus, from the late Miocene, modern horses evolved to have the following traits, consistent with grassland ecosystems becoming more common, EXCEPT for -- A. Formation of hooves and fused forelimb bones. B. Teeth adapted for browsing rather than grazing.. C. A muscle and tendon system allowing for a springing motion in galloping. D. Larger animals better designed for grazing.

Linear evolution suggests that there is a ladder, or step- progression, to evolution over time one species building and transitioning into another species. A bushy interpretation of evolution suggests multiple overlapping species of hominins, with some species short-lived, and others existing for a long period of time. What type of evolutionary model does A. sediba support? Explain your answer.

Answer 2

Question

100%

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

100%

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

100%

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Question

100%

Answer 6

Question

100%

Answer 7

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.

Answer 8

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Answer 9

Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Summary Introduction

To describe: The comparison and differences between Haeckel’s and Von Baer’s ways of thinking about changes in development over the course of animal evolution.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Answer 10

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Among the many first things, the biologists who were studying developmental biology learned that the embryos of many species are more often similar than the adults. Both Karl Von Baer and Ernst Haeckel studied embryo development to know more about the developmental pattern of organisms. In 1882, Karl von Baer noted that those features that are common to higher taxon appear early than those characters of lower tax such as families or order. According to Baer’s law, embryo development passes through the developmental stages of their adults. Haeckel also explained that the development of an organism, during the course of evolution, pass through all its adult form’s developmental stages.

Following are some differences in the way of thinking of these two biologists about changes in an organism’s development over the course of evolution:

Evolution, Chapter 15, Problem 1PDT

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

Expert Solution

Answer 13

Expert Solution

Answer 14

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.

Answer 15

Summary Introduction

To explain: The learning about phylogeny from development, even though Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds.

Introduction: Biologists from the nineteenth and twentieth century compared and described embryonic development of a diverse group of animals. They also described the ways in which the various morphogenetic processes in different groups of organisms result in different adult forms.

Answer 16

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist, interpreted developmental patterns to mean that an individual organism’s development repeats the evolutionary history of adult forms of their ancestors. It is known as “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”.

However, by the end of the 19^th century, it was clear that Haeckel’s dictum seldom holds. For example, embryos of mammal and reptile go through a development stage where they have pharyngeal clefts and branchial arches identical to fish supporting that they share a common ancestor with fish. However, mammals and reptiles never acquire the characters of typical adult fish.

Nevertheless, these developmental studies provided information about the evolutionary relationship between different organisms. By studying embryo development, biologists identified many common developmental difference patterns among species.