Microeconomics, Student Value Edition (2nd Edition)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134461786
Author: Daron Acemoglu, David Laibson, John List
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 1P
To determine
The highest amount a buyer is willing to offer to purchase a house.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
BPO Services is in the business of digitizing information from forms that are filled out by hand. In 2006, a big client gave BPO a distribution of the forms that it digitized in house last year, and BPO estimated how much it would cost to digitize each form.
Form Type
Mix of Forms
Form Cost
A
0.5
$3.00
B
0.5
$1.00
The expected cost of digitizing a form is
.
Suppose the client and BPO agree to a deal, whereby the client pays BPO to digitize forms. The price of each form processed is equal to the expected cost of the form that you calculated in the previous part of the problem.
Suppose that after the agreement, the client sends only forms of type A.
The expected digitization cost per form of the forms sent by the client is
. This leads to an expected loss of
per form for BPO. (Hint: Do not round your answers. Enter the loss as a positive number.)
In a sealed-bid, second-price auction with complete information, the winner is the bidder who submits the second-highest price, but pays the price submitted by the highest bidder. Do you agree? Explain.
Suppose research at Panasonic reveals that prospective buyers are anxious about buying high definition television sets. What strategies might you recommend to the company to reduce consumer anxiety
Chapter 17 Solutions
Microeconomics, Student Value Edition (2nd Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Use the expected value information to illustrate how having more bidders in an oral auction will likely result in a higher winning bid.arrow_forwardSophia is a contestant on a game show and has selected the prize that lies behind door number 3.The show’s host tells her that there is a 50% chance that there is a $15,000 diamond ring behindthe door and a 50% chance that there is a goat behind the door (which is worth nothing to Sophia,who is allergic to goats). Before the door is opened, someone in the audience shouts, “I will giveyou the option of selling me what is behind the door for $8,000 if you will pay me $4,500 for thisoption.” [Assume that the game show allows this offer.]a. If Sophia cares only about the expected dollar values of various outcomes, will she buythis option?b. Explain why Sophia’s degree of risk aversion might affect her willingness to buy thisoptionarrow_forwardThe buyer of a piece of real estate is often given the option of buying down the loan. This option gives the buyer a choice of loan terms in which various combinations of interest rates and discount points are offered. The choice of how many points and what rate is optimal is often a matter of how long the buyer intends to keep the property. Darrell Frye is planning to buy an office building at a cost of $988,000. He must pay 10% down and has a choice of financing terms. He can select from a 7% 30-year loan and pay 4 discount points, a 7.25% 30-year loan and pay 3 discount points, or a 7.5% 30-year loan and pay 2 discount points. Darrell expects to hold the building for four years and then sell it. Except for the three rate and discount point combinations, all other costs of purchasing and selling are fixed and identical. 1. If Darrell chooses the 2-point 7.5% loan, what will be his total outlay in points and payment after 48months? (Wells Fargo)arrow_forward
- Part 1: Payment strings: Calculate the value of the following infinitely repeated string of payoffs. 5 + 0.8*5 + 0.82*5 + 0.83*5 … 10 + 0.5*6 + 0.52*10 + 0.53*6 … For a strategy in an infinitely repeated game, a player will get 20 each round. They have a discount rate of 0.75. What is their total utility for this strategy? For a strategy in an infinitely repeated game, a player will get 40 in the first round. After that, they alternate between getting 50 and getting 10. e. in the second round they get 50, in the third they get 10, in the fourth they get 50, in the fifth they get 10 and so on. They have a discount rate of 0.9. What is their total utility for this strategy?arrow_forwardSee attachments for question context. Question: Some people advocated the following modifiction of the auction rule. A bidder cannot bid for only one object, i.e., if at some point in time he withdraws from the bidding race for one object, he automatically withdraws the race for the other object. Every other aspect of the auction, including how prices increase over time, does not change. What should a bidder do if his valuation for the two objects are 50 and 60, respectively? Explain. Does the auction lead to an efficient allocation? Explain.arrow_forwardConsider the following game: you and a partner on a school project are asked to evaluate the other, privately rating them either "1 (Good)" or "0 (Bad)". After all the ratings have been done, a bonus pot of $1000 is given to the person with the highest number of points. If there is a tie, the pool is split evenly. Both players only get utility from money. Mark all of the following true statements: A. The best response to your partner rating you as Good is to rate them as Good as well. Your answer B. There is no best response in this game. C. Your partner's best response to you rating them as Bad is to also rate you as C Bad. D. Your best response to any strategy of your partner is to play "Good".arrow_forward
- A Nash Equilibrium is the equilibrium of a game in which; Both players get the largest payoff amount Both players get the best payoff independent of what the other players choices are Both player, with the knowledge of what the other players possible moves are, do not have incentive to deviate from their strategy There is incomplete information of the game and each player makes the move that is best for them and their payoff outcomearrow_forwardConsider the following game of ’divide the dollar.’ There is a dollar to be split between two players. Player 1 can make any offer to player 2 in increments of 25 cents; that is, player 1 can make offers of 0 cents, 25 cents, 50 cents, 75 cents, and $1. An offer is the amount of the original dollar that player 1 would like player 2 to have. After player 2 gets an offer, she has the option of either accepting or rejecting the offer. If she accepts, she gets the offered amount and player 1 keeps the remainder. If she rejects, neither player gets anything. Draw the game tree of the modified version of the ’divide the dollar’ game in which player 2 can make a counteroffer if she does not accept player 1’s offer. After player 2 makes her counteroffer - if she does - player 1 can accept or reject the counteroffer. As before, if there is no agreement after the two rounds of offers, neither player gets anything. If there is an agreement in either round then each player gets the amount agreed…arrow_forwardTwo parties, Juan and Ben, have been negotiating the purchase by Ben of Juan's car. Juan receives a new and higher bid for his car from Adriana. How might Adriana's bid change Juan and Ben's threat values? The threat values are unchanged. Juan now values the car at the price of Adriana's bid, her bid is his opportunity cost of selling the car to Ben, and that opportunity cost is Juan's new threat value. Juan's new threat value is the product of the difference between Ben and Adriana's offers and the probability the car will be sold to Adriana. Juan's threat value is unchanged, but Ben has to consider his new opportunity costarrow_forward
- The following table contains the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. Player 2 Cooperate Not Cooperate Player Cooperate 15 , 15 -20 , 20 1 Not Cooperate 20 , -10 10 , 10 This game is infinitely repeated, and in each period both players must choose their actions simultaneously. If both players follow a tit-for-tat strategy, then they can Cooperate in equilibrium if the interest rate r is . At an interest rate of r=0.5, . If instead of playing an infinite number of times, the players play the game only 10 times, then in the first period player 1 receives a payoff ofarrow_forwardProvide an intuitive explanation for why a "buy one, get one free" deal is not the same as a "half-pricearrow_forwardSome collector has a painting that he no longer values. However, there are two buyers that would be happy to acquire it. Buyer 1 assigns a value of $900 to the painting, and buyer 2 of $1,000. Explain that this situation can be represented as a cooperative game with transferable utility. Obtain the set of players and write down the characteristic function (supposing that the grand coalition’s value is $1000). Find the Core and the Shapley value of the game.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning