Microeconomics, Student Value Edition (2nd Edition)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134461786
Author: Daron Acemoglu, David Laibson, John List
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 4P
To determine
Bidding
(a) A lower value like
(b) A higher value like
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Please solve the following problem using a game theory. Consider a scenario in which two companies, Company A and Company B, are competing for a government contract to supply a specific product. The government has set a maximum budget for the contract, and both companies want to maximize their profits. However, the government will only award the contract to the company with the lowest bid, and the companies have to submit sealed bids simultaneously. Company A and Company B both have two options: bid high or bid low. If both companies bid low, they will share the contract and split the profits equally. If one company bids low and the other bids high, the company bidding low will win the entire contract and maximize its profits, while the other company will receive nothing. If both companies bid high, neither will win the contract, and they will receive no profits. The profit structure is as follows (in millions of dollars): If both companies bid low: Company A gets $10 million, and…
Consider the following situation: five individuals are participating in an auction for an old bicycle used by a famous cyclist. The table below provides the bidders' valuations of the cycle. The auctioneer starts the bid at an offer price far above the bidders' values and lowers the price in increments until one of the bidders accepts the offer.
Bidder
Value ($)
Roberto
750
Claudia
700
Mario
650
Bradley
600
Michelle
550
What is the optimal strategy of each player in this case?
Who will win the auction if each bidder places his or her optimal bid?
If Claudia wins the auction, how much surplus will she earn?
Two parties, Juan and Ben, have been negotiating the purchase by Ben of Juan's car. Juan receives a new and higher bid for his car from Adriana. How might Adriana's bid change Juan and Ben's threat values?
The threat values are unchanged.
Juan now values the car at the price of Adriana's bid, her bid is his opportunity cost of selling the car to Ben, and that opportunity cost is Juan's new threat value.
Juan's new threat value is the product of the difference between Ben and Adriana's offers and the probability the car will be sold to Adriana.
Juan's threat value is unchanged, but Ben has to consider his new opportunity cost
Chapter 17 Solutions
Microeconomics, Student Value Edition (2nd Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose there is a second price sealed bid auction in which the players have the following values: v1=15, v2=4, v3=6, v4=8, v5=10, v6=6. In the symmetric equilibrium, what bid will bidder 4 submit? a. 10 b. 15 c. 4 d. 8arrow_forwardThe Dean of Columbia College is looking for a tenured professor to teach in the Core Curriculum. Monetary incentives are needed to get someone interested, but how much? The Dean decides to use an auction to do the job. Two professors, equally qualified, applied for the position. The two professors are invited to covertly submit their bids to the Dean. The Dean will give the position to the professor who submits the lower bid (if there is a tie, the job is assigned randomly). The professor who gets the job will be paid his/her own bid. Each professors reservation value for teaching the course is his/her private information. It is common knowledge that their reservation values are independently and uniformly distributed over [0; 100]: So if a professor with a reservation value of 60 wins with a bid of 50, his payoff is 60 50 = 10: (a) Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the bidding game. (b) Suppose the two professorsíreservation values are 60 and 70, respec- tively. What are…arrow_forwardHello, please help me to solve this question in Game Theory. Thanks in advance!Consider a first price sealed-bid auction of an object with two bidders. Each bidder i’s valuation of the object is vi, which is known to both bidders. The auction rules are that each player submits a bid in a sealed envelope. The envelopes are then opened, and the bidder who has submitted the highest bid gets the object and pays the auctioneer the amount of his bid. If the bidders submit the same bid, each gets the object with probability 0.5. Bids must be integers. Find a Nash equilibrium for this game and show whether it is unique.arrow_forward
- A Nash Equilibrium is the equilibrium of a game in which; Both players get the largest payoff amount Both players get the best payoff independent of what the other players choices are Both player, with the knowledge of what the other players possible moves are, do not have incentive to deviate from their strategy There is incomplete information of the game and each player makes the move that is best for them and their payoff outcomearrow_forwardCommon pool resource game) Consider a common pool resource game with two appropriators. (If you don’t know what is a common pool resource, read the Wikipedia article about the ”Tragedy of the Commons”.) Each appropriator has an endowment e > 0 that can be invested in an outside activity with marginal payoff c > 0 or into the common pool resource. Let x ∈ X ⊆ [0, e] denote the player’s investment into the common pool resource (likewise, y denotes the opponent’s investment). The return from investment into the common pool resource is x x+y · ((x + y) − (x + y) 2 ). So the symmetric payoff function is given by π(x, y) = c · (e − x) + x x+y · ((x + y) − (x + y) 2 ) if x > 0 and c · e otherwise. Assume 1 − e < c < 1. Find Nash equilibrium of the game. Proceed by deriving the best response correspondences first. How does Nash equilibrium depend on parameters c and e (varying one at a time and keeping the others fixed)?arrow_forwardTwo firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium? Is the answer (B,B)? If not please explian what is the answer?arrow_forward
- Consider the following game played by four individuals, players 1, 2, 3, and 4. Each individual has $10,000. Each player can donate between $0 and $10,000 to build a public park that costs $20,000. If they collect enough money, they construct the park, which is worth $9,000 to each of them. However, if they collect less than $20,000, they cannot build a park. Furthermore, regardless of whether the park is built or not, individuals lose any donations that they make. a) Describe the Nash equilibria for a simultaneous game. What makes them equilibria? Hint: There are many equilibria, so you may want to use a mathematical expression! b) Suppose that players 1, 2, and 3, each donate $4,000 for the park. How much will player 4 donate and why. What are the resulting payoffs for the players? c) Suppose instead that player 1 donated first, player 2 second, player 3 third, and player 4 last. Furthermore, players could only donate in intervals of 1,000 (0, $1,000, $2,000, etc.). How much will…arrow_forwardConsider the following game: you and a partner on a school project are asked to evaluate the other, privately rating them either "1 (Good)" or "0 (Bad)". After all the ratings have been done, a bonus pot of $1000 is given to the person with the highest number of points. If there is a tie, the pool is split evenly. Both players only get utility from money. Mark all of the following true statements: A. The best response to your partner rating you as Good is to rate them as Good as well. Your answer B. There is no best response in this game. C. Your partner's best response to you rating them as Bad is to also rate you as C Bad. D. Your best response to any strategy of your partner is to play "Good".arrow_forwardConsider a game where player A moves first, choosing between Left and Right. Then, after observing player A’s choice, player B moves next choosing between Up and Down. Which of the following is true? This is a game where players A and B have the same number of strategies. Player A will get a higher payoff than player B as A moves first. This is game will only have one Nash equilibrium. This is a game of perfect information.arrow_forward
- What is a prisoners' dilemma? a game that involves no dominant strategies a game in which prisoners are stumped because they cannot communicate with each other a game in which players act in rational, self-interested ways that leave everyone worse off a game in which players collude to outfox authoritiesarrow_forwardConsider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning