MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Economics
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134739403
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 18.1.7PA
To determine
Median voter and its relevance.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Please no written by hand
"No voting system is perfect." What does it mean by economist K. Arrow? Give a brief account on Condorcet Voting Paradox. A public school district is voting on the school budget and the resulting student-teacher ratio. A poll finds that 20 percent of the voters want a ratio of 9:1, 25 percent want a ratio of 10:1, 15 percent want a ratio of 11:1, and 40 percent want a ratio of 12:1. What outcome would you expect the district to
Let's walk through the median voter theorem in a little more detail. Consider a town with three voters,
Enrique, Nandini, and Torsten. The big issue in the upcoming election is how high the sales tax rate
should be. As you'll learn in macroeconomics (and in real life), on average, a government that wants to
do more spending has to bring in more taxes, so "higher permanent taxes" is the same as "higher
government spending." Enrique wants low taxes and small government, Nandini is in the middle, and
Torsten wants the biggest town government of the three. Each one is a stubborn person, and his or her
favorite position-what economic theorists call the "ideal point-never changes in this problem. Their
preferences can be summed up like this, with the x denoting each person's favorite tax rate:
Enrique
0%
N
O
Sales tax rate
Nandini
P
Torsten
20%
Suppose there are two politicians running for office, N and O (so ignore P for now). Enrique will vote for
Choose your answer. Nandini will vote for…
In 1989, Senator Bob Packwood asked Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation how much extra revenue the government would raise if it just started taxing 100% of all income over $200,000 per year. The Joint Committee crunched some numbers and reported an answer: $204 billion per year.
a. What is wrong with this answer?
In 1989, very few people made over $200,000 a year, so the estimate of the tax revenue is far too high.
Increasing government spending by $204 billion each year would have generated economic growth, and subsequently even higher amounts of tax revenues.
The Joint Committee on Taxation did not have the tools needed to make such an estimate accurately.
No one would have an incentive to work once they had earned $200,000, so much of the taxable income would disappear.
Chapter 18 Solutions
MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Economics
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.10PA
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.3PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.4PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.5RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.14PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.15PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What is Proportional Tax?arrow_forwardSuppose there are five voters. Their preferences for the amount the federal government should spend to stimulate the economy are shown in the figure to the right. According to the median voter theorem, in a vote, how much will the federal government spend to stimulate the economy? The federal government will spend S billion. (Enter your response as an integer.) 1200 1100 1000- 900- 800- 700- 600 2500- 400- 300- 200- 100- Greg kelly Christina Luisarrow_forwardAll of the following statements are true about median voter theory, except: Select the correct answer below: The median voter is in the middle of the political spectrum. The effects of the U.S. sugar lobby supports median voter theory. Median voter theory suggests that if a candidate needs more than 50% to win an election, the best way to win is to have median preferences. The median voter theory argues that politicians will try to match policies to what pleases the median voter preferences.arrow_forward
- The following table shows how three voters ranked Policy A, Policy B, and Policy C. Which policy is preferred by the majority? Voter 1 Voter 2 Voter 3 Policy A Policy B Policy C First Choice Policy B Policy C Policy A Policy C Policy A Policy B Second Choice Third Choice Select the correct answer below: O Policy B O Policy C one policy is not preferred by the majority O Policy Aarrow_forwardGive a brief example of proportional tax systemarrow_forwardPolitical Economy Assume there are three voters: A, B and C. Voter preferences can be ranked along a left-to-right spectrum that ranges from 1-9; 1 being the most left leaning preference and 9 being the most right leaning preference. Suppose these voters will choose between candidates Smith and Jones in an upcoming election. Voter Id Preference(1-9) A 4 B 5 C 6 True/False Explain: If the median voter theorem holds, candidates Smith and Jones will either both adopt preference 5 OR one will adopt preference 4 while the other adopts preference 6. Suppose the electorate becomes more polarized; A moves from 4 to 1 while C moves from 6 to 9. B remains at 5. How does the median voter model predict candidates Smith and Jones will change their preference? Keeping the assumptions from B, how does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences? If the tax in C induces 100%…arrow_forward
- Political Economy Assume there are three voters: A, B and C. Voter preferences can be ranked along a left-to-right spectrum that ranges from 1-9; 1 being the most left leaning preference and 9 being the most right leaning preference. Suppose these voters will choose between candidates Smith and Jones in an upcoming election. Voter Id Preference(1-9) A 4 B 5 C 6 True/False Explain: If the median voter theorem holds, candidates Smith and Jones will either both adopt preference 5 OR one will adopt preference 4 while the other adopts preference 6. Suppose the electorate becomes more polarized; A moves from 4 to 1 while C moves from 6 to 9. B remains at 5. How does the median voter model predict candidates Smith and Jones will change their preference? Keeping the assumptions from B, how does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences? If the tax in C induces 100%…arrow_forwardPolitical Economy Assume there are three voters: A, B and C. Voter preferences can be ranked along a left-to-right spectrum that ranges from 1-9; 1 being the most left leaning preference and 9 being the most right leaning preference. Suppose these voters will choose between candidates Smith and Jones in an upcoming election. Voter Id Preference(1-9) A 4 B 5 C 6 True/False Explain: If the median voter theorem holds, candidates Smith and Jones will either both adopt preference 5 OR one will adopt preference 4 while the other adopts preference 6. B) Suppose the electorate becomes more polarized; A moves from 4 to 1 while C moves from 6 to 9. B remains at 5. How does the median voter model predict candidates Smith and Jones will change their preference? C) Keeping the assumptions from B, how does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences? D) If the tax in C induces…arrow_forwardWe have heard of "Rock the Vote" or even "Vote or Die." What these ad campaigns are attempting to do is reduce the amount of voter apathy. What do economists call this situation? Using the principles of economics, please explain why there is such a lack of interest in being informed and voting. .arrow_forward
- Suppose that the government collected taxes in the following fashion: people who earn less than $50,000 pay 25 percent in taxes, people who earn between $50,000 and $100,000 pay 35 percent in taxes, people who earn between $100,000 and $200,000 pay 30 percent in taxes, and people who earn more than $200,000 pay 28 percent in taxes. Which of the following statements is correct? a. The tax system is proportional for income levels less than $50,000 and regressive for income levels above $50,000. b. The tax system is regressive for income levels less than $100,000 and progressive for income levels above $100,000. c. The tax system is progressive for income levels less than $100,000 and regressive for income levels above $100,000 . d. The tax system is progressive for income levels less than $50,000 and proportional for income levels above $100,000.arrow_forwardIs the tax imposed on cigarettes a progressive, proportional, or a regressive form of taxation? Why? What are some other examples of this type of tax?arrow_forwardhow does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning