![Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134417295/9780134417295_largeCoverImage.gif)
Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134417295
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 18.1.9PA
To determine
Why it is politically difficult to eliminate tax preferences for some groups in order to improve the tax code efficiency by reducing general tax rates.
Expert Solution & Answer
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Students have asked these similar questions
In 1989, Senator Bob Packwood asked Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation how much extra revenue the government would raise if it just started taxing 100% of all income over $200,000 per year. The Joint Committee crunched some numbers and reported an answer: $204 billion per year.
a. What is wrong with this answer?
In 1989, very few people made over $200,000 a year, so the estimate of the tax revenue is far too high.
Increasing government spending by $204 billion each year would have generated economic growth, and subsequently even higher amounts of tax revenues.
The Joint Committee on Taxation did not have the tools needed to make such an estimate accurately.
No one would have an incentive to work once they had earned $200,000, so much of the taxable income would disappear.
Write the summary of following paragraph.
Tax Treaty
A tax treaty is an agreement between two or more countries by dividing the right to impose a tax on income derived from a state sourced by a resident or resident of another country. The purpose of this tax treaty is to avoid the imposition of double taxation and various tax evasion efforts arising from transactions between the two countries.
One of the tax treaties that will be discussed is the Indonesian tax treaty with Singapore which was signed on May 8, 1990. The avoidance of double taxation on the tax object is as follows:
• Immovable property, income from immovable property under Indonesian-
Singapore tax treaty is taxable only from the country in which the immovable property is situated even though the owner of the immovable object is not a national of that State.
• The operating profit earned by a business entity in a country under this agreement may only be imposed by the country of which the enterprise is domiciled, but…
Suppose that Carson earns $80,000 per year. Now suppose that he must pay income taxes according to the tax schedule shown
below.
Income
$0 to $7,000
$7,001 to $40,000
$40,001 to $75,000
$75,001 to $142,000
Over $142,000
Instructions: Enter your answers rounded to the nearest whole number
a. According to the table, what type of income tax does Carson face?
(Click to select)
b. Assume that Carson has no tax exemptions or deductions. How much in income taxes must Carson pay?
$
What is Carson's marginal tax rate?
percent
Tax Rate (%)
15
15
15
15
15
What is his average tax rate?
percent
A
Chapter 18 Solutions
Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.10PA
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.3PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.4PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.5RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.14PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.15PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- a) Under which circumstances does the tax burden fall entirely on consumers? Briefly explain.arrow_forwardSuppose that a city government introduces a $0.50 excise (commodity) tax on consumers of bottles of soda to improve the health of its citizens. Manipulate the accompanying graph to demonstrate the impact of the tax on the market for soda Market for Bottles of Soda 5.0 4.5 4.0 What would be the new equilibrium quantity if instead of taxing consumers, the city taxed producers? 3.5 3.0 2.5 thousand bottle:s 2.0 0.5 0.0 0 2 34 Quantity (thousands of bottles) 5 8 9 10arrow_forwardSuppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine consumers a tax. Before the tax, 25 billion bottles of wine were sold every year at a price of $7 per bottle. After the tax, 19 billion bottles of wine are sold every year; consumers pay $8 per bottle (including the tax), and producers receive $4 per bottle. The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on producers. True Falsearrow_forward
- Suppose you earn $40,000 per year and pay taxes based on marginal tax rates. The first tax bracket, which taxes at 5 percent, ranges from $0 to $20,000. The second tax bracket, which taxes at 25 percent, ranges from $20,001 to $80,000. How much will you pay in total taxes? Instructions: Enter your answer as a whole number. 2$arrow_forwardIs the tax imposed on cigarettes a progressive, proportional, or a regressive form of taxation? Why? What are some other examples of this type of tax?arrow_forwardBriefly discuss the effect of price elasticity of supply and demand on tax incidence. When the demand for a product is less elastic than supply. pay the majority of the tax on a product; when supply for a product is less elastic than the demand, pay the majority of the tax on the pre firms consumersarrow_forward
- Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine producers a tax. Before the tax, 30 billion bottles of wine were sold every year at a price of $7 per bottle. After the tax, 25 billion bottles of wine are sold every year; consumers pay $9 per bottle, and producers receive $6 per bottle (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is s per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers iss per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is s per bottle.arrow_forward"We should impose a 20 percent luxury tax on expensive automobiles (those with a sales price of $75,000 or more) in order to collect more tax revenue from the wealthy." Will the burden of the proposed tax fall primarily on the wealthy? Why or why not?arrow_forwardUse information from paragraph 4 to answer the following question. Before the Progressive Era, many taxes had been based on property. But many wealthy people hid such property as stocks and bonds from the govemment and did not pay taxes on them. Largely for this reason, progressives demanded that taxes be based on income rather than on property. In 1911, Wisconsin passed the first effective state income tax law. Two years later, Congress enacted what became the first permanent federal income tax in the United States. Which conclusion about taxation during the Progressive Era is best supported by the text? O Progressives demanded that taxes be based on income rather than on property. O Property taxes included ownership of stocks and bonds, which are inescapable today. O Property taxes were an ineffective means for the government to collect the money it needed to operate. O Progressives managed to pass the first state income tax, which was two years before the federal law was passed. 7 8…arrow_forward
- Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge beer producers a tax. Before the tax, 20 million cases of beer were sold every month at a price of $4 per case. After the tax, 13 million cases of beer are sold every month; consumers pay $7 per case, and producers receive $2 per case (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a case of beer is per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is per case, and the burden that falls on producers is per case. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been the same as if the tax had been levied on consumers. True Falsearrow_forwardThe FICA tax is levied on employers, employees, and certain self-employed individuals. Revenue goes to Social Security and Medicare. In 2014, the employee's contribution to the retirement part of the FICA tax was 6.2 percent of the first $117,000 earned in wages and salaries. (Medicare is withheld on all wages and tips.) People with income from interest and dividend payments do not have to pay any Social Security tax on this income. What is the tax structure for the income tax over the income range of $0 to $117,000? O Proportional Tax O Progressive Tax Regressive Taxarrow_forwardWhat would it take to convert a sales tax into a true consumption tax? Senator Smith has suggested that the U.S. federal income tax is a more efficient form of tax than the Texas sales tax. What are the arguments for and against this position?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305506725/9781305506725_smallCoverImage.gif)
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305506893/9781305506893_smallCoverImage.gif)
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning