Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134417295
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 18.3.4PA
To determine
Whether businesses cannot pay taxes.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine consumers a tax. Before the tax, 25 billion bottles of wine were sold every year at a price of $7 per bottle. After the tax, 19 billion bottles of wine are sold every year; consumers pay $8 per bottle (including the tax), and producers receive $4 per bottle.
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is
per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is
per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is
per bottle.
True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on producers.
True
False
Macmillan Learning
Suppose that a city government introduces a $0.50 excise
(commodity) tax on consumers of bottles of soda to improve
the health of its citizens. Manipulate the accompanying graph
to demonstrate the impact of the tax on the market for soda.
What would be the new equilibrium quantity if instead of
taxing consumers, the city taxed producers?
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
Market for Bottles of Soda
thousand bottles
Price ($/bottle)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
1
2
5
6
3 4
Quantity (thousands of bottles)
D
7
8
9
10
Compare one poor person with an income of
$10,000 per year with a relatively wealthy person
who has an income of $60,000 per year. Imagine
that the person drinks 15 bottles of wine per year
at a price of $10 per bottle while the wealthy
person drinks 50 bottles of wine per year at an
average price of $20 per bottle. If a tax of $1 per
bottle is imposed on wine, who pays more on
taxes? Who pays the greater amount as a
percentage of income? If a tax equal to 10% of the
wine is imposed, who pays more in taxes? Who
pays more as a greater percentage of income?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Economics Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText (2-semester Access) -- Access Card Package (6th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.10PA
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.3PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.4PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.5RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.14PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.15PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Economist Arthur Laffer famously pointed out that, in some cases, income tax revenue can actually go up when tax rates go down. Why might this be the case?arrow_forwardSuppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine producers a tax. Before the tax, 30 billion bottles of wine were sold every year at a price of $7 per bottle. After the tax, 25 billion bottles of wine are sold every year; consumers pay $9 per bottle, and producers receive $6 per bottle (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is s per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers iss per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is s per bottle.arrow_forwardAccording to Ibn Hazm, when zakah collection is not sufficient to satisfy the basic needs of the poor, tax should be levied upon the wealthy Muslims. Explain how Ibn Hazm’s idea of ‘extra taxation’ or ‘supplementary tax’ for the fulfilment of basic needs can be introduced in modern times? Apply a simple working mechanism for that additional tax in Malaysiaarrow_forward
- Suppose that a city government introduces a $0.50 excise (commodity) tax on consumers of bottles of soda to improve the health of its citizens. Manipulate the accompanying graph to demonstrate the impact of the tax on the market for soda Market for Bottles of Soda 5.0 4.5 4.0 What would be the new equilibrium quantity if instead of taxing consumers, the city taxed producers? 3.5 3.0 2.5 thousand bottle:s 2.0 0.5 0.0 0 2 34 Quantity (thousands of bottles) 5 8 9 10arrow_forward18_Which of the following is an example of a direct tax? Check all that apply. A tax placed directly on alcohol to discourage people from drinking A tax placed directly on cigarettes to encourage people to stop smoking Income tax A poll or head tax that charges everyone the same euro amount Which of the following choices represent excise taxes? Check all that apply. A tax of an absolute sum levied on every person or every household The 20% value added tax on a €60,000 Porsche A tax levied on business profits Social Security taxes The 60 pence per-litre unit tax on petrol purchased at a pump in the UK True or false: Any form of an excise tax is a regressive tax. False Truearrow_forwardIn 1989, Senator Bob Packwood asked Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation how much extra revenue the government would raise if it just started taxing 100% of all income over $200,000 per year. The Joint Committee crunched some numbers and reported an answer: $204 billion per year. a. What is wrong with this answer? In 1989, very few people made over $200,000 a year, so the estimate of the tax revenue is far too high. Increasing government spending by $204 billion each year would have generated economic growth, and subsequently even higher amounts of tax revenues. The Joint Committee on Taxation did not have the tools needed to make such an estimate accurately. No one would have an incentive to work once they had earned $200,000, so much of the taxable income would disappear.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning