Based on the theory of rational ignorance, what should we expect to happen to voter turnout as the internet makes information easier to obtain?
The expectation that will change the voter turnout when the information is available on the internet on the basis of theory of rational ignorance is to be determined.
Answer to Problem 1SCQ
The voter turnout is expected to be on a positive side as the people who are eligible to vote will take interest in casting their vote once the information is easily available on the internet.
Explanation of Solution
The rational ignorance theory is the theory which states that the people who are voting is of the view that their vote is not going to change anything and not even the results of the voting will get affected from their votes. The theory also indicates that the people will get to vote only when there is no cost to acquire the information and when such information is available on internet such people should not to spend much to acquire information and will start taking interest in the elections.
Thus, the above discussion shows that there is an expectation of increase in the voter turnout on the easy availability of information on the internet.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Principles of Economics 2e
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
Managerial Accounting (5th Edition)
Gitman: Principl Manageri Finance_15 (15th Edition) (What's New in Finance)
Intermediate Accounting (2nd Edition)
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in Intro to Business)
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
- Jerry’s effective rate is 20%. What is his taxable income in 2022, if he paid $25,000 in taxes in 2022. Group of answer choices $125,000 $5000 $625,000 $100,000arrow_forwardPaul made an initial deposit of $5,000 into an account earning 3% annual interest compounded quarterly. After 1 year, the account's future value is closest to: Group of answer choices $5469 $5009.35 $5113.56 $5150arrow_forwardFind the total amount of interest paid over the course of the loan that is $199,000 compounded at 7.01% for 25 years? Group of answer choices $263,328.10 $203,328.10 $323,328.10 $223,328.10arrow_forward
- If Theresa paid $5,000 in taxes last year on taxable income of $50,000, her effective tax rate was Group of answer choices 1000% 0.1% 20% 10%arrow_forwardFind the total amount of interest paid if the loan is $175,000 compounded at 6.24% for 30 years? Group of answer choices $272,492.19 $212,492.19 $252,492.19 $1075672.11arrow_forwardSara invests $1,000 at a rate of 5% simple annual interest over 4 years. How much interest will she earn? Group of answer choices $1020 $1050 $200 $50arrow_forward
- Which earns more interest over 30 years - $5,000 at 6% simple interest or $4,000 at 6% compound interest? Group of answer choices ..$5,000 simple interest ..Not enough information provided ..$4,000 compound interest ..Both earn the same interestarrow_forwardMaria makes $35,000 per year. After taking deductions and credits, Maria's total tax liability is $4,200. What is Maria's effective tax rate? Group of answer choices ...8.33% ...28% ...12% ...20%arrow_forwardUnions bargain collectively over which of the following? Wages Benefits Work conditions Hiring policies Group of answer choices 2 and 3 only 1 and 2 only 1-4 1, 2 and 3 onlyarrow_forward
- Income(s) range in ($) Population 0-10,000 10,000 10,000-30,000 5000 30,001-50,000 2000 50,001-70,000 500 70,001-90,000 300 90,000-100,000 150 Over 100,000 50 If the poverty line is $70,000, what income range is the most likely range to be identified as NEAR POOR? 30,001-50,000 70,001-90,000 500 50,001-70,000arrow_forward3. Suppose that MRPL = 200 - L for female workers, where L = the number of female workers and MRPL is measured in dollars per hour. The going wage for female workers is $50 per hour, but employer A discriminates against these workers and has a discrimination coefficient, D, of $4 per hour. Graph the MRPL curve and show how many female workers employer A hires. How much profit has employer A lost by discriminating?arrow_forward1. Based on the Kleven et al. (2019) paper's graphs, answer the next questions: Short-Run Long-Run Panel B. Hours worked 0.2 First child birth Hours worked relative tor- 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.6 Long-run child penalty = 0.097 TT -5-4-3-2-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Event time (years) Male Female Panel D. Wage rates First child birth Wage rate relative tor: 0.2 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2- -0.3 -0.4 -0.5- -0.6 Long-run child penalty = 0.091 דד -5-4-3-2-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Event time (years) Male Female Panel B. Hours worked Hours worked relative tor=-1 0.2 20 years after child birth First child birth || 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 우 -0.64 -5 0 5 10 Long-run child penalty -0.065 Event time (years) TT 15 20 Male Female Panel D. Wage rates 0.2+ Wage rate relative to = -1 20 years after child birth First child birth T 0.1 0- -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 Long-run child penalty = 0.143 -0.6 TT -5 0 5 10 15 20 Event time (years) Male Female a) What might explain the wage drop for females…arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning