MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Foundations of Economics
8th Edition
ISBN: 9780134518312
Author: Robin Bade, Michael Parkin
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 7IAPA
To determine
To explain:
The fair-fixing scheme which is a result of the equilibrium outcome of an oligopoly cartel game and the reason the cartel survived.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Case study 1.8: Mobile phone networks Predatory roaming
They were in the bank, toting guns, as lots of money happened to go from the vault. That was the essence of last week’s claim by Mario Monti, the European Union’s competition commissioner, that mobilephone operators have gouged customers by colluding to raise rates for roaming – ie, when you use your mobile phone abroad. Mr Monti’s case is circumstantial, but he says the network operators will have to answer it. 324 STRATEGY ANALYSIS In December Mr Monti’s office issued a report on the market for roaming. Most countries in the European Economic Area (EEA), the report found, have a roaming market that is ripe for collusion. The product is undifferentiated, and the number of sellers small. Pricing in the wholesale market is transparent, making it easy for a market leader to raise prices, and for other operators to take the hint and follow suit. The costs of running mobile networks do not vary that much. As a result, says the…
JetBlue and Delta are the only two major airlines with regularly scheduled service between New York and Nantucket. There are 900 potential passengers every week, each of whom is willing to pay up to $400 for a ticket. Since the two airlines provide an essentially identical (bad) service, customers simply prefer to buy from the cheaper one. (If they charge the same price, then they will split the market equally.)
Each airline can transport at most 1200 passengers each week. You can safely assume that each airline spends literal peanuts (i.e., zero) serving passengers; however, each passenger displaces air cargo that is worth $160 in profits to the carriers. Suppose that each airline takes a short-run perspective and only wants to maximize each week's profits, and that neither one would consider shutting down the route in the foreseeable future.
(a) What is the appropriate economic model to study price competition in this market?
(b) If you use Nash equilibrium to make a prediction, what…
JetBlue and Delta are the only two major airlines with regularly scheduled service between New York and Nantucket. There are 900 potential passengers every week, each of whom is willing to pay up to $400 for a ticket. Since the two airlines provide an essentially identical (bad) service, customers simply prefer to buy from the cheaper one. (If they charge the same price, then they will split the market equally.)
Each airline can transport at most 1200 passengers each week. You can safely assume that each airline spends literal peanuts (i.e., zero) serving passengers; however, each passenger displaces air cargo that is worth $160 in profits to the carriers. Suppose that each airline takes a short-run perspective and only wants to maximize each week's profits, and that neither one would consider shutting down the route in the foreseeable future.
(a) What is the appropriate economic model to study price competition in this market?
(b) If you use Nash equilibrium to make a prediction, what…
Chapter 18 Solutions
MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Foundations of Economics
Ch. 18 - Prob. 1SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 2SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 3SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 4SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 5SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 6SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 7SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 8SPPACh. 18 - Prob. 1IAPACh. 18 - Prob. 2IAPA
Ch. 18 - Prob. 3IAPACh. 18 - Prob. 4IAPACh. 18 - Use this information to work Problems 5 to 7. DOJ...Ch. 18 - Use this information to work Problems 5 to 7. DOJ...Ch. 18 - Prob. 7IAPACh. 18 - Which of the following statements is incorrect. In...Ch. 18 - If firms in oligopoly form a cartel, it will...Ch. 18 - Prob. 3MCQCh. 18 - Prob. 4MCQCh. 18 - Prob. 5MCQCh. 18 - Prob. 6MCQCh. 18 - Prob. 7MCQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- JetBlue and Delta are the only two major airlines with regularly scheduled service between New York and Nantucket. There are 900 potential passengers every week, each of whom is willing to pay up to $400 for a ticket. Since the two airlines provide an essentially identical (bad) service, customers simply prefer to buy from the cheaper one. (If they charge the same price, then they will split the market equally.) Each airline can transport at most 1200 passengers each week. You can safely assume that each airline spends literal peanuts (i.e., zero) serving passengers; however, each passenger displaces air cargo that is worth $160 in profits to the carriers. Suppose that each airline takes a short-run perspective and only wants to maximize each week’s profits, and that neither one would consider shutting down the route in the foreseeable future. a) What is the appropriate economic model to study price competition in this market, and why? b) If you use Nash equilibrium to make a…arrow_forward3_____. Esther, a teenager, gets $8 per hour for babysitting. Steven lives two doors down and turns 15 next month. Mary is worried that Steven may want to start earning extra money by babysitting, too, and may charge less money. This is a problem a . Bargaining power of suppliers. b . Rivalry among existing firms. c . Threat of new entrants. d . Threat of substitutions. e . Bargaining power of customersarrow_forwardTwo firms compete in a Cournot fashion. Firm 1 successfully engages in an activity that raises its rival’s marginal cost of production. a. Provide two examples of activities that might raise rivals’ marginal costs. b. In order for such strategies to be beneficial, is it necessary for the manager of firm 1 to enjoy hurting the rival? Explain.arrow_forward
- Suppose we have 5 people who might attend up to 2 theatre shows at the local theatre. There’s a drama and a comedy. The marginal cost of a seat on any given night is both constant and negligible (you can safely ignore it), so profit maximization and revenue maximization amount to the same thing. Below are the maximum willingness to pay values (a person will pay a price up to that value, but no greater) for a seat for each of the 5 people for the two shows. The theatre is a profit-maximizing firm. What individual ticket price (i.e., the price for anybody attending the show would be the same, but it could be different across shows) would separately maximize profit for each show?arrow_forwardRecall the price matching game we discussed in class video. The main conclusion we can draw from this analysis was a. price matching acts like excess capacity because it deters entry into the market b. price matching can result in consumers paying higher than competitive prices c. price matching re-enforces the Nash equilibrium of low competitive pricing d.firms will invest in productive capacity to obtain economies of scalearrow_forwardTarget produces a good with significant network externalities. The willingness to pay equation is p = 1 – q + 2.5q2 . Show on the graph the firm’s demand curve at each price from 0 < P < 3. What three equilibrium values of q may result if Firm A sets a price of $1.5? Indicate them on your graph. [the quadratic equation helps you solve for one of them.] Are the equilibria you identify stable? Does stability matter to Acme?arrow_forward
- This is a Microeconomics problem. I need help for part (d). Two firms A and B operating in the same market must choose between a collude price and a cheat price. Answer the following questions in order. (a) Does Firm A have a dominant strategy? Explain your answer. (b) Does Firm B have a dominant strategy? Explain your answer. (c) Is there an equilibrium solution to the above game? (d) Is this equilibrium solution to the game the most "ideal" outcome for the players? Explain clearly why or why not.arrow_forwardSuperior Cable TV buys the right to provide an exclusive movie network (HBOW) in its province. Superior pays $300,000 a year for HBOW and the marginal cost of providing HBOW is zero. Superior's economist realizes they have two groups of customers: the 8,000 hard-core HBOW fans who will pay up to $300 a year for the exclusive network; and the 70,000 casual TV viewers who will pay up to $30 a year for HBOW. If Superior Cable TV can price discriminate, what is its maximum profit?arrow_forwardExplain how organizations can collude to raise prices of products like sugar using the concept of market forces.arrow_forward
- The police want to discourage drunk driving. You can drink wine or cola at your friend’s party. But since you are driving home you may get stopped by the police as they might conduct RIDE this evening (RIDE is a sobriety testing program used by police in Ontario). If you drink wine, you will drink four glasses, and if RIDE is active you will be charged with drunk driving and go to jail. Solve the game. Police You Wine RIDE (-2,-1) (0,-1) No RIDE (1,-2) (0,0) Colaarrow_forwardIndicate for each sentence whether it is true or false. Mark true with a T and false with a F. For each sentence, write a few words of justification. Suppose that firms A, B, and C have the option to coalize with one of the other firms to exclude the third from the market. That is, the three possible coalitions that can be formed are {A, B}, {A, C}, and {B, C}. Each possible coalition creates a market value that can be shared (although not equally) between the two firms involved. Thus, coalition {A, B} has value 40, {A, C} has value 90, and {B, C} has value 120. a. In the bargaining set, the payoff for A is 20. b. The bargaining set is empty. c. The allocation (15 to A, 25 to B) following coalition {A, B} is blocked by coalition {B, C} with allocation (30 to B, 80 to C). d. It is possible to find a Pareto-efficient allocation. e. If B claims 35 in a coalition with A, then A cannot object that it will be able to claim for a larger value in a coalition with Carrow_forwardSuppose that two firms in an industry that has a Herfindahl index of 1,000 announce a merger. The U.S. Justice Department concludes the merger will boost the index to 1,050. The antitrust authorities will most likely Multiple Choice allow the merger, but only if foreign entry to the industry is possible. ignore this merger because of the relatively small size of, and increase in, the Herfindahl index. prevent the merger. allow the merger, but strictly regulate the prices set by the new combi ned firm.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning