CengageNOWv2, 1 term Printed Access Card for Hansen/Mowen’s Cornerstones of Cost Management, 4th
CengageNOWv2, 1 term Printed Access Card for Hansen/Mowen’s Cornerstones of Cost Management, 4th
4th Edition
ISBN: 9781305970762
Author: Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 19, Problem 24P

1.

To determine

Prepare a schedule for expected cash flows of company H.

1.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Net cash flow: Net cash flow is the difference between cash receipts and cash payments.

Year

Operating costs after tax

(A)(1)

Savings (4) (B)Depreciation expenses after tax (3) (C)

Net cash inflow

(ABC)

0   $(630,000)
1($31,500)$218,700$18,000$205,200
2($31,500)$218,700$36,000$223,200
3($31,500)$218,700$36,000$223,200
4($31,500)$218,700$36,000$223,200
5($31,500)$218,700$36,000$223,200
6($31,500)$218,700$36,000$223,200
7($31,500)$218,700$36,000$223,200
8($31,500)$218,700$18,000$205,200
9($31,500)$218,700-$187,200
10($31,500)$218,700-$187,200

Table (1)

Working note (1):

Calculate the annual operating cost after tax:

Annual operating cost after tax = Operating cost after tax×(1Tax rate) =$45,000+$7,500×(140100)=$52,500×0.60=$31,500

Working note (2):

Calculate the annual depreciation expense.

Annual depreciation = Book value of assetsUseful life=$630,0007 years=$90,000

Working note (3):

Calculate the annual depreciation expense after tax:

YearAnnual deprecation (A) (2)Deprecation after tax(A×40%)
145,000$18,000
290,000$36,000
390,000$36,000
490,000$36,000
590,000$36,000
690,000$36,000
790,000$36,000
845,000$18,000

Table (2)

Note: The annual depreciation expense is $90,000; however the depreciation expense is calculated on the basis of straight line deprecation with half year convention method. Hence, the depreciation expense under half year convention method is $45,000($90,0002).

Working note (4):

Calculate the annual savings after tax:

Savings=Total Saving×(1Tax rate)=$364,500×(140%)=$218,700

2.

To determine

Calculate the payback period of company H.

2.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Payback period: Payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the proposal of long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business. But payback method has high risk than other method, because it does not follow the time value of money concept in valuing the cash inflows.

Calculate the payback period of company H as follows:

Initial investment = $630,000.

YearCash inflowAccumulated cash flow
1$205,200$205,200  
2$223,200$428,400 ($205,200+$223,200)
3$223,200$651,600($428,400+$223,200)
4$223,200$874,800 ($651,600+$223,200)
5$223,200$1,098,000($874,800+$223,200)
6$223,200$1,321,200 ($1,098,000+$223,200)
7$223,200$1,544,400($1,321,200+$223,200)
8$205,200$1,749,600 ($1,544,400+$223,200)
9$187,200$1,936,800 ($1,749,600+$223,200)
10$187,200$2,124,000($1,936,800+$223,200)

Table (3)

In this case, the initial investment of $630,000 falls between $428,400 and $651,600. Hence, the payback period is calculated as follows:

Payback period for uneven cash flow} = [2year +(Balance amount of intital investmentCash flow for particular year)]=2 year +(($630,000$428,400)$223,200)=2 year + 0.90 year=2.90 years

Therefore, the payback period for the given investment is 2.90 years.

3.

To determine

Ascertain the Net present value of the closed-loop system and describe whether the company should invest in the system.

3.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Ascertain the Net present value of the closed-loop system and describe whether the company should invest in the system:

YearCash inflowPresent value factor @10%Present value
1$205,200 0.862$ 176,882
2$223,200 0.743$ 165,838
3$223,200 0.641$ 143,071
4$223,200 0.552$ 123,206
5$223,200 0.476$ 106,243
6$223,200 0.410$ 91,512
7$223,200 0.354$ 79,013
8$205,200 0.305$ 62,586
9$187,200 0.263$ 49,234
10$187,200 0.227$ 42,494
Total present value$ 1,040,080
Less: Cash outflow for investment$ 630,000
Net present value$ 410,080

Table (4)

The company should invest in the system because the net present value is positive.

4.

To determine

State the effect that the inclusion of after tax would have on the payback period and on the net present value.

4.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

State the effect that the inclusion of after tax would have on the payback period and on the net present value:

Payback period:

In this case, the annual cash flows increase by $135,000. Therefore the cash inflow for year 1 would increase to $340,200 ($205,200+$135,000) and $358,200 for Years 2–7($223,200+$135,000).

Initial investment = $630,000.

YearCash inflowAccumulated cash flow
1$340,200$340,200
2$358,200$698,400
3$358,200$1,056,600
4$358,200$1,414,800
5$358,200$1,773,000
6$358,200$2,131,200
7$358,200$2,489,400

Table (5)

In this case, the initial investment of $630,000 falls between $340,200 and $698,400. Hence, the payback period is calculated as follows:

Payback period for uneven cash flow}=[1year +(Balance amount of intital investmentCash flow for particular year)]=1 year +(($630,000$340,200)$358,200)=1 year + 0.81 year=1.81 years

Therefore, the payback period for the given investment is reduced by 1.81 years (2.90 years1.81 years).

Net present value:

ParticularsAmounts in ($)Amounts in ($)
Fines and sales (a)$135,000  
NPV for 10 years (b)$4.833  
Fines and sales effect   $652,455
Lawsuit avoidance  $300,000  
NPV for 3 years  $0.641  
Add: Lawsuit avoidance   $192,300
Total NPV $844,755

Table (6)

Therefore, the net present value is increased by $434,676($844,755$410,079).

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Heaps Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Heaps uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The…
Heaps Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Heaps uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water thatis discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environ-mental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system totreat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality.…
Pollution Prevention, P2 Investment Heaps Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Heaps uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but also produce cleaner water than that currently being…

Chapter 19 Solutions

CengageNOWv2, 1 term Printed Access Card for Hansen/Mowen’s Cornerstones of Cost Management, 4th

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS
Accounting
ISBN:9780357110362
Author:Murphy
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage