![EBK PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134069180/9780134069180_largeCoverImage.gif)
EBK PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134069180
Author: Oster
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 1.3P
To determine
Is the efficiency statement right or wrong.
Expert Solution & Answer
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Students have asked these similar questions
The accompanying table shows the relationship between the
speed of a computer's CPU and its benefits and costs. Assume
that all other features of the computer are the same (that is,
CPU speed is the only source of variation), and only the CPU
speeds listed in the table are available for purchase.
CPU
Total
Marginal
Total
Marginal
GHz
Benefit
Benefit
Cost
Costs
2.0
$1,000
$900
2.5
$1,400
$ 100
3.0
$300
$1,200
3.5
$1,900
$ 1,500
4.0
$2,000
$ 400
The marginal cost of upgrading from a 2.5GHz to 3.0GHz
computer is
O $400.
O $300.
$200.
O $100.
The following accompanying table shows the relationship between the speed of a computer's CPU and its benefits and costs. Assume that all other
features of the computer are the same (that is, CPU speed is the only source of variation), and only the CPU speeds listed below are available for
purchase.
CPU
Total
Marginal Total Marginal
GHz
Benefit
Benefit
Cost
Costs
2.0
$1,000
$900
2.5
$1,400
$100
$1,200
$1,500
3.0
$300
3.5
$1,900
4.0
$2,000
$400
The total benefit of a 3.0GHZ computer is:
It was not quite what the planners had in mind when Sweden and Denmark opened their expensive bridge across the Oresund strait in July. After an early boost from summer tourism, car crossings have fallen sharply, while trains now connecting Copenhagen, the Danish capital, and Malmo, Sweden’s third city, are struggling to run on time. Many people think the costs of using the bridge are simply too high. And, from the point of view of Scandinavian solidarity, the traffic is embarrassingly one-sided: far more Swedes are going to Denmark than vice versa. So last week the authorities decided to knock almost 50% off the price of a one-way crossing for the last three months of this year. The two governments, which paid nearly $2 billion for the 16km (10-mile) state-owned bridge-cumtunnel, reckoned that, above all, it would strengthen economic ties across the strait and create, within a few years, one of the fastest-growing and richest regions in Europe. But ministers on both sides of the…
Chapter 2 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- It was not quite what the planners had in mind when Sweden and Denmark opened their expensive bridge across the Oresund strait in July. After an early boost from summer tourism, car crossings have fallen sharply, while trains now connecting Copenhagen, the Danish capital, and Malmo, Sweden’s third city, are struggling to run on time. Many people think the costs of using the bridge are simply too high. And, from the point of view of Scandinavian solidarity, the traffic is embarrassingly one-sided: far more Swedes are going to Denmark than vice versa. So last week the authorities decided to knock almost 50% off the price of a one-way crossing for the last three months of this year. The two governments, which paid nearly $2 billion for the 16km (10-mile) state-owned bridge-cumtunnel, reckoned that, above all, it would strengthen economic ties across the strait and create, within a few years, one of the fastest-growing and richest regions in Europe. But ministers on both sides of the…arrow_forwardAir pollution in the country of Gawanza has grown over the last ten years with an increase in manufacturing industries. The government of Gawanza now has a plan to reduce the CO2 emissions into the air by 10% per year over the next 10 years. What do you expect will happen? The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be lowest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be lowest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost of reducing CO2 will be the highest and marginal benefits of reducing CO2 will be the lowest in year ten. The marginal cost of reducing CO2 will be the highest and marginal benefits of reducing CO2 will be the lowest in year ten. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be highest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing…arrow_forward12. The city of Mysuru is one of the cleanest cities of India and is in close driving distance from Bengaluru, the IT hub. You have been invited as an external IT consultant by Government of India with a mandate to convert Mysuru into a “Smart City” a. Which “Smart” city in the world will you choose as a benchmark to emulate some of the best practices of that city into Mysuru? Provide at least 3 reasons with brief descriptions behind your choice of choosing that particular city as a benchmark? b. Suggest & describe at least 2 innovative technology enabled services that you will introduce into Mysuru so that it can be called as a “Smart city”?arrow_forward
- Part 1. Imagine you have a diesel-powered car, and you can buy either diesel or biodiesel fuel (which is possible in some parts of the US). The cost of biodiesel is $38/GJ, and the biodiesel causes 22 kg CO2 emissions per GJ over its lifetime. The diesel costs $30/GJ and causes 88 kg CO2 emissions per GJ over its lifetime (4 times more!!). Part 1: What is the cost of mitigation of choosing biodiesel? Part 2. What carbon tax would be required to make the biodiesel cost the same as the diesel?arrow_forwardPlease solve part d,e and f!!! Three roommates, Jim, Saleem, and Ritesh, are thinking about buying a new speaker system for their apartment. The speaker system would be a public good if they buy them, and the total cost would be $300 which would be shared equally among the three. Jim values it at $80, Saleem values it at $140, and Ritesh values it at $70. If the speakers are purchased each person gets a payoff equal to their net valuation (valuation minus cost share); if they are not purchased each gets zero payoff. a)Is it socially efficient that they buy the speaker system? With reference to the definition of a public good, why or why not? The roommates decide that they will write down their net valuations, and if these reports sum to more than zero, they will buy the TV (sharing the cost equally), or else they will not. b) If all were to report their true valuations, what payoff would each agent earn? c) Show that if Jim and Ritesh submit their true net valuation, then Saleem does…arrow_forwardU.S. route 83 passes through the village of Burr Ridge, IL. The engineers of the Transportation Department have proposed constructing a new highway through existing farmland to bypass the city for use by through traffic. The new bypass would however entail an initial construction cost of $40 million and an average annual maintenance cost of $50,000. a) List all major positive impacts that this project could have on the downtown area. b) What are the major negative impacts that this project could have on the downtown area? c) List all major positive impacts that this project could have on the areas near the proposed bypass. d) List all major negative impacts that this project could have on the areas near the proposed bypass.arrow_forward
- 10 . Cost-benefit analysis A local college is deciding whether to conduct a campus beautification initiative that would involve various projects, such as planting trees and remodeling buildings, to make the campus more aesthetically pleasing. For the students of the college, the visual appearance of the campus is and . Thus, the visual appearance would be classified as a public good. Suppose the college administrators estimate that the beautification initiative will cost $38,080. To decide whether the initiative should be undertaken, administrators conduct a survey of the college's 1,830 students, asking each of them their willingness to pay for the beautification project. The average willingness to pay, as revealed by the survey, is $16. The benefit of the beautification initiative, as suggested by the survey, is . Because the estimated benefit is than the cost, the college administrators undertake the beautification initiative. The calculation of…arrow_forwardAssess urban ecology and the pursuit of sustainable citiesarrow_forwardc. Imagine that you are trying to decide whether to cross a street without using the designated crosswalk at the traffic signal. What are the expected marginal benefits of crossing? The expected marginal costs? How would the following conditions change your benefit-cost equation? The street is busy. i. ii. The street is empty and it was 3 a.m. ii. You are in a huge hurry. iv. A police officer is standing 100 feet away. v. The closest crosswalk is a mile away. vi. The closest crosswalk is 10 feet away.arrow_forward
- Suppose you are part of an economic analysis team charged with recommending a policy response to pesticide risks. Explain the steps your team should take and why.arrow_forwardSuppose the LNG Inc. company wants to build three pipelines that would carry fuels under your city. The pipelines pose risks of groundwater contamination and explosion. For each pipeline the table below shows the marginal benefit to LNG Inc. and the marginal cost of expected damages to residents (in millions of dollars). Pipelines Total Profits for LNG Inc. Total Damage to Residents Marginal Benefit (added profits) Marginal Cost (added damages) 0 0 0 0 0 1 120 55 120 55 2 200 130 80 75 3 270 255 70 125 Suppose that LNG Inc. is entitled under the injunctive remedy. The range of offers (in millions of dollars) that the residents mights make and LNG Inc. might accept to eliminate the third pipeline is between (minimally) ______ and (maximally) _________. Please fill the blanks.arrow_forwardSuppose that total costs (TC) double for each project listed in the table below. Cost-Benefit Analysis for a National Highway Construction Project (in Billons) (2) Total Cost of Project (3) Marginal (4) Total Benefit $0 200 (5) Marginal Benefit (1) Plan No new construction A: Widen existing highways B: New 2-1ane highways C: New 4-lane highways D: New 6-1ane highways (6) Mat Benefit $ 0 150 Cost 50 $50 $ 200 140 90 350 150 210 230 240 100 470 120 620 380 580 110 -40 Which project(s) is (are) now economically viable? O Plan A only O Plans C and D only O Plans B and C Plans A and B only O None of the projects are economically viable.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781544336329/9781544336329_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc