MACROECONOMICS - MYECONLAB >IA<
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780135852866
Author: Hubbard
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 2.1.13PA
To determine
Relevance of
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
How would an economist answer the question: "What is the socially best amount of pollution control?" Will that likely be zero pollution?
Economists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this?
A.
Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970.
B.
When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower.
C.
When levels of pollution are…
what is the connection between Economics & Healthcare? in four sentences
Chapter 2 Solutions
MACROECONOMICS - MYECONLAB >IA<
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1TCCh. 2 - Prob. 2TCCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.4PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.5PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.6PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.7PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.8PA
Ch. 2 - Prob. 2.1.9PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.10PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.11PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.12PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.13PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.14PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.3PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.4PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.5PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.6PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.7PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.8PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.9PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.10PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.11PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.12PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.13PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.14PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.15PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.4RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.5RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.6RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.7PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.8PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.9PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.10PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.11PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.12PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.13PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.14PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.15PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.16PA
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- What would you recommend your govt. to limit urbanization in Pakistan?According to the United Nations Development Program, Pakistan has the highest rate of urbanization in South Asia, with 36.4% of the population living in urban areas. The UN estimates that by 2025 nearly half of the country's inhabitants will be living in cities. Briefly explainarrow_forwardSuppose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate global warming in the United States. Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy? Reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient. Society would not benefit from lower air pollution. The environment isn’t worth protecting. The opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit.arrow_forwardIn the diagram, the MC curve slopes upward because Multiple Choice the less pollution society reduces the higher the utility (benefit) of the next unit of pollution reduction. the more pollution society reduces the higher the utility (benefit) of the next unit of pollution reduction. the more pollution society reduces the lower the cost of each additional unit of pollution reduction. the more pollution society reduces the higher the cost of each additional unit of pollution reduction.arrow_forward
- In an article in the agriculture magazine Choices, Oregon State University economist JunJie Wu made the following observation about the conversion of farmland to urban development: Land use provides many economic and social benefits, but often comes at a substantial cost to the environment. Although most economic costs are figured into land use decisions, most environmental externalities are not. These environmental "externalities" cause a divergence between private and social costs for some land uses, leading to an inefficient land allocation. For example, developers may not bear all the environmental and infrastructural costs generated by their projects. Such "market failures" provide a justification for private conservation efforts and public land use planning and regulation. What does the author mean by market failures and inefficient land use allocation? Explain why the author describes inefficient land allocation as a market failure. Illustrate your argument with a…arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $10 and his value of the dog is $20. Lisa's value of the cat is $30 and her value of the dog is $10. 1. What is the efficient pet? Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. 2. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? 3. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose? 4. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is heads, what will Lisa choose? 5. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is tails, what will Bart choose?arrow_forwardUsing macroeconomics, briefly describe the main economic dilemma of an economyarrow_forward
- Suppose that Hubert, an economist from an AM talk radio program, and Kate, an economist from a school of industrial relations, are arguing over health insurance. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate: Kate: A popular topic for debate among politicians as well as economists is the idea of providing government assistance for health benefits. Hubert: I think it is oppressive for the government to tax people who take care of themselves in order to pay for health insurance for those who are obese. Kate: I disagree. I think government funding of health insurance is useful to ensure basic fairness. The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to (DIFFERENCE IN SCIENTIFIC JUDGEMENT, DIFFERENCE IN VALUES, DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PERCEPTION VERSUS REALITY) . Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree? A. Employers should not be restricted from outsourcing work to foreign nations.…arrow_forwardSuppose that we have a model that estimates that taking the COVID-19 vaccine creates a positive externality to society that is at least equal to $1500 per vaccine. (Amazing, right? Well, remember that I made it up.) This means that for every person that takes the vaccine, the benefits to society will be $1500 or more. a. First, what factors do you think go into estimating the benefits of $1500 per vaccine. This is kind of a brainstorming question – but it is worth points so don’t skip it. b. What is the relationship between the equilibrium quantity of vaccines and the socially optimal quantity of vaccines?arrow_forwardA local school administrator is concerned that flu outbreaks are putting children at risk, so she proposes that the state should subsidize flu shots in order to increase coverage rates. -Are the administrator’s concerns valid—are too few children getting flu shots—and will a subsidy help? -The school nurse suggests publishing a list of which kids did not get a flu shot, in the hope that public shaming will lead people to vaccinate their children. Is this strategy likely to work?arrow_forward
- Bart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $10 and his value of the dog is $40. Lisa's value of the cat is $30 and her value of the dog is $20. a. What is the efficient pet? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. b. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] c. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] d. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is heads, what will Lisa choose?…arrow_forwardNobel Prize winner and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman noted that economics is a lot like medicine: Knowledge is limited and many cures are quite painful. What are some other ways that economics and medicine are alike?arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $20 and his value of the dog is $40. Lisa's value of the cat is $45 and her value of the dog is $15. 1. What is the efficient pet? Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. 2. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? 3. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Environmental Law: The Clean Air Act; Author: LawShelf;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-SH3kJpVA4;License: Standard Youtube License