Study Guide for Microeconomics
20th Edition
ISBN: 9780077660673
Author: William B Walstad
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 24, Problem 3DQ
To determine
Theproductive efficiency.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
In Country A, the production of 1 bicycle requires using resources that could otherwise be used to produce 11 lamps. In Country B, the production of 1 bicycle requires using resources that could otherwise be used to produce 15 lamps. Which country has a comparative advantage in making bicycles? LO26.2 a. Country A. b. Country B
Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products— baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fishIn what product should each nation specialize? Which of the following terms of trade would be acceptable to both nations: (a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1 2 cans tuna fish; (b) 1 can baby formula ≡ 1 can tuna fish; (c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish?
Suppose Big Country can produce 80 units of X by using all its resources to produce X or 60 units of Y by devoting all its resources to Y. Comparable figures for Small Nation are 60 units of X and 60 units of Y. Assuming constant costs, in which product should each nation specialize? Explain why. What are the limits of the terms of trade between these two countries? How would rising costs (rather than constant costs) affect the extent of specialization and trade between these two countries?
Chapter 24 Solutions
Study Guide for Microeconomics
Ch. 24.2 - Prob. 1QQCh. 24.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 24.2 - Prob. 3QQCh. 24.2 - Prob. 4QQCh. 24 - Prob. 1DQCh. 24 - Prob. 2DQCh. 24 - Prob. 3DQCh. 24 - Prob. 4DQCh. 24 - Prob. 5DQCh. 24 - Prob. 6DQ
Ch. 24 - Prob. 7DQCh. 24 - Prob. 8DQCh. 24 - Prob. 9DQCh. 24 - Prob. 10DQCh. 24 - Prob. 11DQCh. 24 - Prob. 12DQCh. 24 - Prob. 13DQCh. 24 - Prob. 14DQCh. 24 - Prob. 1RQCh. 24 - Prob. 2RQCh. 24 - Prob. 3RQCh. 24 - Prob. 4RQCh. 24 - Prob. 5RQCh. 24 - Prob. 6RQCh. 24 - Prob. 7RQCh. 24 - Prob. 8RQCh. 24 - Prob. 9RQCh. 24 - Prob. 10RQCh. 24 - Prob. 11RQCh. 24 - Prob. 12RQCh. 24 - Prob. 13RQCh. 24 - Prob. 1PCh. 24 - Prob. 2PCh. 24 - Prob. 3PCh. 24 - Prob. 4P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that the productivity per worker in the milk and cranberry juice industries of Southland and Northland are as follows: Output in Thousands of Litres Milk Cranberry Juice Northland 6 Or 3 Sounthland 2 Or 1 a) Which country has the absolute advantage in producing milk? b) Which country has the absolute advantage in producing cranberry juice? c) Which country has the comparative advantage in producing milk? d) Which country has the comparative advantage in producing cranberry juice? e) According to the theory of comparative advantage, will there be trade? If yes, what is the direction of trade?arrow_forward2. In the USA 1 unit of labor can produce 50 cars while in Canada 1 unit of labor can produce5 cars. The total amount of labor in each country is L = 100. Which one of these statements iscorrect?A. Canada has comparative advantage on the production of cars.B. The USA has comparative advantage on the production of cars.C. Since their production possibility frontiers are the similar neither country has comparativeadvantage on the production of cars.D. Not enough information to answer this question.arrow_forwardAssume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products—baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 7 cans tuna fish a. In what product should each nation specialize? Canswicki should produce _____- , and Tunata should produce _____ b. Would the following terms of trade be acceptable to both nations? i. 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fish: yes or no ii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 8 cans tuna fish: yes or no iii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 5.5 cans tuna fish: yes or noarrow_forward
- Suppose that Poland and Wales both produce ale and glass. Poland's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 4 kegs of ale while Wales's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 12 kegs of ale. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing glass in the two countries, you can tell thatWales has a comparative advantage in the production of glass andPoland has a comparative advantage in the production of ale. Suppose that Poland and Wales consider trading glass and ale with each other. Poland can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of ale for each pane of glass it exports to Wales. Similarly, Wales can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of glass for each keg of ale it exports to Poland. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of glass in terms of ale) would allow both Wales and Poland to gain from trade? Check all that apply. 8 kegs of…arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is true about comparative advantage? O.a) Comparative advantage is interesting theoretically, but it is not relevant when evaluating real-world economic conditions.O.b) Comparative advantage exists whenever one person, firm, or nation can do something at lower opportunity costs than some other individual, firm, or nation.O.c) Comparative advantage exists whenever one person, firm, or nation can do something at higher opportunity costs than some other individual, firm, or nation.O.d) Only technologically advanced economies can have a comparative advantage in the production of a good or service.arrow_forward2. Suppose that the United States and Mexico are the only two countries in the world and that labor is the only productive input. In the United States, a worker can produce 12 bushels of wheat or 2 barrels of oil in a day. In Mexico, a worker can produce 2 bushels of wheat or 4 barrels of oil per day. a. What will be the price ratio between the two commodities (that is, the price of oil in terms of wheat) in each country if there is no trade? b. If free trade is allowed and there are no transportation costs, which commodity would the United States import? What about Mexico? c. In what range would the price ratio have to fall under free trade? Why?arrow_forward
- 1. Suppose there are two countries Peru and Japan that produce Food and Fuel. Peru can produce 7,523 units of Food or 17,853 units of Fuel using a labour force of 8000. Japan can produce 5,733 units of Food or 24,156 units of Fuel using a labour force of 5000. a) Which country has the comparative advantage in food? In fuel? Explain. b) Which good(s) should each country specialize in? c) Discuss the benefits of specialization for each country.arrow_forwardP1. Let’s assume there are only 2 countries that produce 2 good. More specifically, suppose that the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) each have 2 units of productive resources, 1 used to produce Wine, the other Cloth. The US can produce 40 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 40 units of Cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. The UK can produce 20 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 10 units of cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. Using this information, please answer the questions below: 1. What are the gains from trade? 2. What is the “range” of potential exchange rates between US and UK?arrow_forwardP1. Let’s assume there are only 2 countries that produce 2 good. More specifically, suppose that the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) each have 2 units of productive resources, 1 used to produce Wine, the other Cloth. The US can produce 40 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 40 units of Cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. The UK can produce 20 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 10 units of cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. Using this information, please answer the questions below: *Who has an absolute advantage in the production of Wine? Cloth? *Who has a comparative advantage in the production of Wine? Cloth? *Given specialization, what is production before trade? After trade? *What are the gains from trade? *What is the “range” of potential exchange rates between US and UK? P2. Suppose that in Japan, without a tariff 10,000 cars will be sold per year at an equilibrium price of $20,000. With a $5,000 tariff,…arrow_forward
- 5) Suppose that the United States has an absolute advantage over Mexico in producing both agriculturaland manufactured goods. In the U. S., the opportunity cost of 1 unit of agricultural output is 2 units ofmanufactured goods. In Mexico, the opportunity cost of 1 unit of agricultural output is 1.5 units ofmanufactured goods. Total production in the U. S. and Mexico will be maximized ifa. the U. S. specializes in both types of outputb. Mexico specializes in both types of outputc. the U. S. specializes in agricultural goods and Mexico specializes in manufacturedgoodsd. the U. S. specializes in manufactured goods and Mexico specializes in agriculturalgoodse. each country achieves self-sufficiencyarrow_forward4. Assume a two-country two-good two-input model. Let the countries in the model be Vietnam andMyanmar and the goods be shirts and natural gas. The two factors of production are labor and land.Further, Vietnam is labor-abundant and shirts production is labor-intensive. Suppose, in the absenceof trade, Vietnam operates at a point on its production-possibility curve where it produces andconsumes 20 units of shirts and 25 units of natural gas. Once it engages in free trade, the internationalprice of one unit of natural gas is .8 units of a shirt. In response to the opening of trade, Vietnammoves along its production-possibility curve to a new point where it produces 100 units of shirts and10 units of natural gas. Assume that with free trade, Vietnam chooses to consume 52 units of shirtsand chooses to trade all of its remaining surplus of shirts.a. Demonstrate the gains to trade for Vietnam.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...
Economics
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc