Concept explainers
In 1798, a stuffed platypus specimen was delivered to the British Museum. Reports that it laid eggs created much confusion. To modem biologists, a platypus is clearly a mammal. It has fur and the females produce milk. Young animals have typical mammalian teeth that are replaced by hardened pads of the “bill” as the animal matures. Why do you think modem biologists can more easily accept that a mammal can have some reptilelike traits than scientists who were considering this animal in the late 1700s?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 25 Solutions
Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap Course List)
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Evolutionary Analysis (5th Edition)
Microbiology with Diseases by Taxonomy (5th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology with Physiology (5th Edition)
Anatomy & Physiology (6th Edition)
Laboratory Experiments in Microbiology (11th Edition)
- The nonfunctional pelvis and hind limbs found in some snakes support which statement about evolution?Mutations tend to make species evolve to resemble other species in their environment.Snakes evolved from the same common ancestor as species in which these structures are functional.Selection pressures promoting snake evolution ceased before snake anatomy was well adapted.Snakes began to evolve these structures, but selection pressures did not favor them.arrow_forwardChanges in the traits of the fossils studied are consistent with what is expected to be favored by natural selection, given environmental changes during that time. Thus, from the late Miocene, modern horses evolved to have the following traits, consistent with grassland ecosystems becoming more common, EXCEPT for -- A. Formation of hooves and fused forelimb bones. B. Teeth adapted for browsing rather than grazing.. C. A muscle and tendon system allowing for a springing motion in galloping. D. Larger animals better designed for grazing.arrow_forwardBecause of selective forces, the dinosaurs were superbly adapted to their environments. After the dinosaurs became extinct, the small mammals that had been relatively unimportant animals in the background flourished and evolved into many new types, including the line that led to human beings. It is unlikely that these new types would have ever evolved had not the dinosaurs disappeared. If the extinction of the dinosaurs was caused by an extraterrestrial impact, did it matter how well they were adapted to their environment? What does this suggest about the starting cause in the evolutionary success of these new types of mammals?arrow_forward
- Humans as individuals have a number of disadvantages compared to other animals. For instance we are not very fast, strong, cannot see well in the dark, have a poor sense of smell and hearing compared to other animals, and we are not very good climbers. With all of these disadvantages how is it that we have been so successful? Shouldn't we have gone extinct as other humanoids such as Homo erectus? Discuss why humans have beaten the odds and are so successful.arrow_forwardHomo heidelbergensis is considered by many to be a transitional species between Homo ergaster and Homo neanderthalensis. Use the following two models to help you answer the questions below. a. Name one Homo ergaster trait observable in this fossil.b. Name one Homo neanderthalensis trait observable in this fossil.arrow_forwardA biologist is trying to infer how five closely related species of snakes are related to one another. She notices that some of the snakes have forked tongues and others do not. Which of the following would help her distinguish the ancestral state? Group of answer choices She looks at a representative mammal species to see if it has a forked tongue. She locates a specimen of a more closely related snake to see if it has forked tongue. She looks among snakes fossils for evidence that being forked is a characteristic of the ancestor of this group, but determines no such fossil exist. She flips a coin.arrow_forward
- The two primates shown below both exhibit large eye orbits. One is a tarsier, the other is an owl monkey (the only nocturnal platyrrhine). Why do these primates share the trait for large eyes? Mark the best answer. Group of answer choices Random mutations, since having large eyes is abnormal in these species of primate. Convergent evolution, since both separately evolved large eyes to adapt to a nocturnal activity pattern. Both inherited this trait from their common ancestor, which was also nocturnal with large eyes. Unclear, cannot determine from the information given.arrow_forwardSome human traits may have arisen by sexual selection. Over thousands of years, women attracted to charming, witty men perhaps prompted the development of human intellect beyond what was necessary for mere survival. Men attracted to women with juvenile features may have shifted the species as a whole to be less hairy and softer featured than any of our simian relatives. Can you think of a way to test this hypotheses?arrow_forwardWhich of the following best reflects a phylogenetic relationship between chimpanzees and baboons? A. They are grouped together because they live in similar habitats. B. They are grouped together because they have a common ancestor in recent history. C. They are grouped together because they both have an opposable thumb. D. They are grouped together because they both feed their young breast milk.arrow_forward
- Mammals have a particularly good sense of earing thanks to their inner ear which includes three tiny bones. Reptiles, in contrast, have a single inner ear bone. The lower jaw of reptiles is composed of multiple bones while the lower jaw of mammals is a single bone. Fossil and developmental evidence indicate that the inner ear bones of mammals evolved from lower jawbones. This suggests that the inner ear bones of mammals are 1. an analogy 2. an exaptation 3. a living fossil 4. a transitional trait 5. a vestigial structurearrow_forwardFossilized remains of prehistoric mastodons show anatomical similarities to modern-day elephants. These similarities provided the first evidence that mastodons were related to modern-day elephants. Which of the following is the BEST additional evidence that mastodons were related to elephants? A. Mastodons walked on four legs like modern-day elephants. B. Mastodon tissues contained proteins with similar amino acid sequences compared to modern-day elephants. C. Mastodon fossils were found in the same area where modern-day elephants live. D. Mastodons ate a diet similar to that of modern-day elephants.arrow_forwardBipedalism has many selective advantages. However, there is one disadvantage to walking on two feet: giving birth to an offspring with a large head through a small pelvic opening, which is necessitated by an upright posture, is very difficult. This situation results in a high percentage of deaths (for mother and child) during birth compared to primates. How do you explain the selection of a trait that is both positive and negative?arrow_forward
- Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap...BiologyISBN:9781305073951Author:Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology (Mi...BiologyISBN:9781305117396Author:Cecie Starr, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage Learning