(a)
Determine the growth rate
(a)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
(b)
Determine the value of growth rate
(b)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
(c)
Determine the value of growth rate
(c)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
(d)
Determine the value of growth rate
(d)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
(e)
Determine the value of growth rate
(e)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
(f)
Determine the value of growth rate
(f)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
(g)
Determine the value of growth rate
(g)
Explanation of Solution
If k, l and m grows at constant rate, then the growth rate can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the growth rate is
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Korea. Over the last 60 years or so, Korea has been one of the most successful economies in the world. What are the sources of this success? Consider the following data: GDP per capita is expressed in 2017 US dollars. Population and employment are in millions of heads. Capital is in thousands of dollars. Education is a human capital index based on the average years of schooling. (a) Compute the (average continuously compounded) growth rate of GDP per worker. (b) Use our growth accounting methodology to allocate growth in output per worker to TFP, capital per worker, and human capital. What factors are most important? (c) What is the growth rate of GDP per capita? How does it differ from growth in output per worker? Why?arrow_forwardConsider an economy with a Cobb-Douglas production function with α = 1/3 that begins in steady state with a growth rate of technological progress of g of 2 percent. Consider what happens when g increases to 3 percent. (a) What is the growth rate of output per worker before the change? What happens to this growth rate in the long run? (b) Perform a growth accounting exercise for the economy, decomposing the growth rate in output per capita into components contributed by capital per capita growth and technology growth. What is the contribution of the change in g to output per capita growth according to this formula? (c) In what sense is the growth accounting result in part b producing a misleading picture of this experiment? Explain why this is the case.arrow_forwardAn increase in research productivity: Suppose the economy is on a balanced growth path in the Romer model, and then, in the year 2030, research productivity z̅ rises immediately and permanently to the new level z̅′. Solve for the new growth rate of knowledge and yt. Make a graph of yt over time using a ratio scale. Why might research productivity increase in an economy? I do not understand how to solve this, I'm confused. Am I supposed to make an equation or write out an answer?arrow_forward
- A mathematical approximation called t he rule of 70 tells us that the number of years that it will take something that is growing to double in size is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by its percentage rate of growth. Thus, if Mexico’s real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per year, it will take about 10 years (= 70 / 7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the following problem. Real GDP per person in Mexico in 2005 was about $11,000 per person, while it was about $44,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP per person in Mexico grows at the rate of 5 percent per year, about how long will it take Mexico’s real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was at in 2005? (Hint: How many times would Mexico’s 2005 real GDP per person have to double to reach the United States’ 2005 real GDP per person?)arrow_forwardUsing logarithmic form of this GDP production function compute the TFP contribution to GDP growth rate assumingalpha=0.4, beta=0.50 while GDP growth rate is 4.0 percent, capital stock growth rate is 5percent, labor growth 3percent and human capital growth 2 percent.arrow_forwardWhich of the following is a true statement? Multiple Choice Economists who support economic growth say that it is the most practical route to the higher standards of living that the vast majority of people desire. Most economists believe that the recent rise in the average rate of productivity growth implies an end to the business cycle. Most economists believe that increases in real GDP actually produce decreases in overall economic well-being because of spillover costs. Mainstream economists disagree as to whether the rate of productivity growth was higher between 1995 and 2012 or between 1973 and 1995.arrow_forward
- An increase in research productivity: Suppose the economy is on a balanced growth path in the Romer model, and then, in the year 2030, research pro-ductivity z rises immediately and permanently to the new level z r. (a) Solve for the new growth rate of knowledge and yt.(b) Make a graph of yt over time using a ratio scale.arrow_forwardSuppose you add a variable rate of population growth to a two-sector model of growth. Draw and properly label a graph on how the production function, investment requirement line, and saving line look like. Does the addition of the variable rate of population growth to this model help you explain anything that a simpler two-sector model with a fixed rate of growth, or a one sector model with variable population growth, cannot? Expound.arrow_forwardSuppose the economy is on a balanced growth path in the Romer model, and then, in the year 2030, ̄l (lower case L bar) decreasesimmediately and permanently to the new level ̄l′ (lower case L bar one). (a) Solve for the new growth rate of knowledge and yt. (b) Make a graph of yt over time using a ratio scale.arrow_forward
- Consider an economy in which the labour force grows by 2.7 percent per annum, physical capital grows by 4 percent per annum and human capital grows by 1.8 percent per annum. Suppose 45 percent of national income goes to labour and 40 percent to capital. Use a constant returns to scale production function to answer the following growth accounting questions: (a) If the Solow residual were zero what rate of growth would the economy achieve? (b) The country's actual rate of growth has been 4.5 percent per annum, which is faster than the growth rate generated by the accumulation of capital and labour stocks. Calculate the value of the residual.arrow_forwardIf the GDP (t) of Japan is $997.50B today and this country is expecting its GDP (t+1) to be $1,076.9 next year, what is the expected growth rate?arrow_forwardIf an economy's GDP will double in 15 years, then its growth rate must be about: 7% 15% 10% 4.7%arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning