PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
23rd Edition
ISBN: 9781260433197
Author: Jones
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 5IRP
To determine
Identify the tax issues and state the issues in the form of question.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Ms. T. Potts, the treasurer of Ideal China, has a problem. The company has just ordered a new kiln for $464,000. Of this sum, $58,000 is described by the supplier as an installation cost. Ms. Potts does not know whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will permit the company to treat this cost as a tax-deductible current expense or as a capital investment. In the latter case, the company could depreciate the $58,000 straight-line over 5 years. The tax rate is 30% and the opportunity cost of capital is 5%.
a. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a separate current expense?b. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a part of the capital investment?
Ms. T. Potts, the treasurer of Ideal China, has a problem. The company has just ordered a new kiln for $416,000. Of this sum, $52,000
is described by the supplier as an installation cost. Ms. Potts does not know whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will permit the
company to treat this cost as a tax-deductible current expense or as a capital investment. In the latter case, the company could
depreciate the $52,000 straight-line over 5 years. The tax rate is 30% and the opportunity cost of capital is 5%.
a. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a separate current expense?
b. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a part of the capital investment? (Round your
answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
a. Present value
b. Present value
Ms. T. Potts, the treasurer of Ideal China, has a problem. The company has just ordered a new kiln for $704,000. Of this sum, $88,000 is described by the supplier as an installation cost. Ms. Potts does not know whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will permit the company to treat this cost as a tax-deductible current expense or as a capital investment. In the latter case, the company could depreciate the $88,000 straight-line over 5 years. The tax rate is 30% and the opportunity cost of capital is 5%.
a. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a separate current expense?
b. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a part of the capital investment?
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion
Chapter 3 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
Ch. 3 - Does the NPV of future cash flows increase or...Ch. 3 - Explain the relationship between the degree of...Ch. 3 - Does the after-tax cost of a deductible expense...Ch. 3 - Prob. 4QPDCh. 3 - Prob. 5QPDCh. 3 - Prob. 6QPDCh. 3 - Prob. 7QPDCh. 3 - Which type of tax law provision should be more...Ch. 3 - In the U.S. system of criminal justice, a person...Ch. 3 - Identify two reasons why a firms actual marginal...
Ch. 3 - Prob. 11QPDCh. 3 - Prob. 12QPDCh. 3 - Prob. 1APCh. 3 - Prob. 2APCh. 3 - Prob. 3APCh. 3 - Use a 5 percent discount rate to compute the NPV...Ch. 3 - Consider the following opportunities: Opportunity...Ch. 3 - Prob. 6APCh. 3 - Refer to the income tax rate structure in the...Ch. 3 - Prob. 8APCh. 3 - Company N will receive 100,000 of taxable revenue...Ch. 3 - Prob. 10APCh. 3 - Investor B has 100,000 in an investment paying 9...Ch. 3 - Firm E must choose between two alternative...Ch. 3 - Company J must choose between two alternate...Ch. 3 - Firm Q is about to engage in a transaction with...Ch. 3 - Corporation ABC invested in a project that will...Ch. 3 - Prob. 16APCh. 3 - Investor W has the opportunity to invest 500,000...Ch. 3 - Prob. 18APCh. 3 - Prob. 19APCh. 3 - Prob. 20APCh. 3 - Prob. 21APCh. 3 - Prob. 1IRPCh. 3 - Firm V must choose between two alternative...Ch. 3 - Prob. 3IRPCh. 3 - Refer to the facts in problem 3. Company WB is...Ch. 3 - Prob. 5IRPCh. 3 - Prob. 6IRPCh. 3 - Prob. 7IRPCh. 3 - Prob. 8IRPCh. 3 - Prob. 9IRPCh. 3 - Prob. 1TPCCh. 3 - Firm D is considering investing 400,000 cash in a...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Seved Help Ms. T. Potts, the treasurer of Ideal China, has a problem. The company has just ordered a new kiln for $560,000. Of this sum, $70,000 Is described by the supplier as an installation cost. Ms. Potts does not know whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will permit the company to treat this cost as a tax-deductible current expense or as a capital investment. In the latter case, the company could depreciate the $70,000 straight-line over 5 years. The tax rate is 30% and the opportunity cost of capital is 5%. a. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a separate current expense? b. What is the present value of the cost of the kiln if the installation cost is treated as a part of the capital investment? (Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.) a. Present value b. Present valuearrow_forwardThe treasurer of New Semiconductor has a problem. The company has just ordered new assembly robotics for $3,500,000. The manufacturer would install the robotics for an additional $50,000. The treasurer does not know whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will permit the company to treat this installation cost as a tax-deductible expense (end of Year 1) or view the installation as part of the capital investment. In the latter case, the company would capitalize the installation cost and depreciate the $50,000 along with the cost of the robotics according to the 5-year MACRS tax depreciation schedule: Year 1: 20% Year 2: 32% Year 3: 19.2% Year 4: 11.52% Year 5: 11.52% Year 6: 5.76% Assuming the tax rate is 35% and the discount rate is 5%, calculate: 1) the present value of the tax shields if the installation costs are expensed at the end of Year 1, and 2) the present value of the tax shields if the installation costs are capitalized and depreciated according to 5-year MACRS. a.…arrow_forwardMr. Ben T. Lador, the Chief Accountant, availed of the car plan of Kiowa Company. Under the plan, he will shoulder only half of the cost of the car, with the company shouldering the other half. He paid P450,000 for the car. The car was registered in the name of Mr. Lador. Questions: 1. How much is the fringe benefit tax due? 2. How much is the deductible expense of Kiowa Company?arrow_forward
- Atimonan Company received a bill for P27,440 from a VAT service provider. The payment for the service is subject to 2% creditable withholding tax. If Atimonan is a VAT taxpayer and a top withholding agent, what is the deductible expense? What respectively is the withholding tax and the amount of cash to be paid by Atimonan to the service provider?arrow_forwardPetroleum, Inc. is in need of tax consulting services and wants to engage an accounting firm to perform these services on its behalf. The following events have occurred: On December 1, Petroleum, Inc., sent Brick, Waterhouse, & Co. (BW&C) a letter, via overnight delivery, offering to engage BW&C to review Petroleum’s tax situation for the current year for $10,000. In the letter, the company stated that BW&C had ten days to accept. On December 5, BW&C sent an e-mail message that stated, “The price for the tax analysis seems too low. We remain interested in the engagement. Would you consider paying $15,000?” Petroleum received the message without responding immediately. The next day, Smith & Taylor, a BW&C competitor, offered to conduct the tax services for $8,000. On learning of this offer, BW&C immediately e-mailed Petroleum, agreeing to do the work for $10,000. Petroleum received this message on December 7. Explain why BW&C and Petroleum do, or do…arrow_forwardSam Club earned $50,000 and paid taxes of $10,000. Samantha Heartearned $60,000 and paid taxes of $12,000. If these taxes were paid to thesame government agency, is the tax on income progressive, regressive, orproportional? How did you reach this conclusion?arrow_forward
- Company N will receive $55,000 of taxable revenue from a client. Use Appendix A and Appendix B. Required: Compute the NPV of the $55,000 assuming that Company N will receive $27,500 now (year 0) and $27,500 in year 1. The company’s marginal tax rate is 30 percent, and it uses a 6 percent discount rate. Compute the NPV of the $55,000 assuming that Company N will receive $27,500 in year 1 and $27,500 in year 2. The company’s marginal tax rate is 40 percent, and it uses a 4 percent discount rate. Compute the NPV of the $55,000 assuming that Company N will receive $11,000 now (year 0) and $11,000 in years 1, 2, 3, and 4. The company’s marginal tax rate is 10 percent, and it uses a 9 percent discount rate.arrow_forwardTennis Shoe Warehouse operates in a state with a 6.5% sales tax. For convenience, TennisShoe Warehouse credits Sales Revenue for the total amount (selling price plus sales tax) collectedfrom each customer. If Tennis Shoe Warehouse fails to make an adjustment for sales taxes,a. net income will be understated and liabilities will be overstated.b. net income will be overstated and liabilities will be overstated.c. net income will be overstated and liabilities will be understated.d. net income will be understated and liabilities will be understated.arrow_forwardChanon, Inc. is a supplier of office equipments to the government. The company has recently delivered P2,000,000 worth of equipments but remains unpaid as of date. Yesterday, the company received a Final Assessment Notice from the Bureau of Internal Revenue for deficiency taxes and penalties amounting to P2,000,000. Can Chanon opt not to pay BIR? a. Yes, as the receivable and the tax liability can be set-off as the other party is also the government. b. No, as Chanon can still avail of its judicial remedies. c. Yes, as the claim against the government arose first. d. No, as Chanon's claim is a debt and the government's claim is taxes. These cannot be set-off.arrow_forward
- Upward and Onward, Inc., a § 501(c)(3) organization that provides training programs for welfare recipients, reports the following income and expenses from the sale of products associated with the training program. Gross income from sales $425,000 Cost of goods sold 106,000 Advertising and selling expenses 26,000 Administrative expenses 112,500 Calculate Upward and Onward's UBIT under the following two assumptions. Assume a tax rate of 21%. If an amount is zero, enter "0". If the sale of the training program products is not substantially related to Upward and Onward's exempt purpose, then Upward and Onward's UBIT is $arrow_forwardFirm E must choose between two alternative transactions. Transaction 1 requires a $9,150 cash outlay that would be nondeductible in the computation of taxable income. Transaction 2 requires a $14,800 cash outlay that would be a deductible expense. Required: a. Determine the after-tax cost for each transaction. Assume Firm E's marginal tax rate is 25 percent. b. Determine the after-tax cost for each transaction. Assume Firm E's marginal tax rate is 45 percent.arrow_forwardA corporation has an excess input VAT due to its excessive local purchases of goods and services. This excess input VAT is accumulating every month and reached a significant value. The management is considering to deal with the excess input VAT. a. Determine the best option for the corporation in treating its excess input VAT to gain maximum tax benefit. Justify your answer. b. Assume that the excess input VAT is directly attributable to its Zero-rated VAT Sales, explain the options that could possibly be considered by the management.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Depreciation -MACRS; Author: Ronald Moy, Ph.D., CFA, CFP;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsf7NCnkAmk;License: Standard Youtube License