MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Microeconomics
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134739656
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 4.3.14PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
The consumer surplus,
Subpart (b):
To determine
The consumer surplus, producer surplus and deadweight loss.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The following graph shows the market for milk.
The market price of milk without government intervention is____________per gallon.
Consider the legislation that doesn't allow the price of milk to be below $8 per gallon and stimulates that the government by any surplus milk produced at that price. In order to raise the price of $8 per gallon, the government would need to buy______million gallons of milk, which would cost the government__________million.
Suppose there are only a few dairy Farmers who would benefit from this legislation and millions of consumers who would suffer through higher prices. In this case, legislation imposing price supports at $8 per gallon would mean which of the following?
The legislation will probably pass because it's benefits are concentrated while it's cost or widespread.
The legislation should pass because it's economical efficient, but it probably won't because consumers don't understand enough about economics.
The legislation may or may not pass since…
This question analyze the market for cellular service.
QD = 50 – 0.25P
QS = 2P – 76
a. Suppose the government imposes a $60 price ceiling. Calculate the new quantity sold in the market.
Q =
a. Suppose the government instead imposes a $50 price ceiling. Calculate the new quantity sold in the market.
Q =
b. Briefly explain whether the $50 price ceiling creates a shortage or surplus in the market, and calculate the size of that shortage/surplus.
What is The amount of the surplus or shortage is units?
c. Calculate the amount of deadweight loss associated with the $50 price ceiling.
DWL =
In 1990, the U.S. Congress imposed an excise tax on yachts built in the U.S. and other high-priced luxury products such as jewelry and fur coats with a price over $100,000. The Joint Congressional Committee on Taxation predicted that these so-called “luxury taxes” would raise more than $30 million for the federal government in 1991. In fact, these taxes generated only about $16 million in revenue. Furthermore, about 7500 jobs in the U.S. boat-building industry were lost, so those workers paid less in income taxes. Putting this all together, the luxury tax led to a decrease of $7 million in government revenue rather than the predicted $30 million increase. Why didn’t the plan to raise government revenue by imposing an excise tax on luxury goods work as planned? Explain what mistake Congress made in setting the tax on luxury products.
Chapter 4 Solutions
MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card -- for Microeconomics
Ch. 4.A - Prob. 1RQCh. 4.A - Prob. 2RQCh. 4.A - Prob. 3RQCh. 4.A - Why would economists use the term deadweight loss...Ch. 4.A - Prob. 5PACh. 4.A - Prob. 6PACh. 4.A - Prob. 7PACh. 4.A - Prob. 8PACh. 4.A - Prob. 9PACh. 4 - Prob. 1TC
Ch. 4 - Prob. 2TCCh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.3RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.4RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.5PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.6PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.7PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.8PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.9PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.10PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.11PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.12PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.13PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.1.14PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.3PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.4PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.5PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.6PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.7PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.8PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.9PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2.10PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.3RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.4RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.5PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.6PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.7PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.8PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.9PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.10PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.11PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.12PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.13PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.14PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.15PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.16PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.17PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.18PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.3.19PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.3RQCh. 4 - As explained in the chapter, economic efficiency...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.4.5PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.6PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.7PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.8PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.9PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.4.10PACh. 4 - Prob. 4.2CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 3. The following is quoted from Global News "British Columbians could be fined $230 for not wearing a mask in indoor, public spaces" by Richard Zussman on November 24, 2020. "Provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry was reluctant to put in a mandatory mask policy but decided to support the policy after concerns were raised by businesses about enforcing a mask requirement." Many people would not wear masks in public indoor spaces before the mandatory mask policy was enforced. What kind of market failure do you think exist in this case? How does the $230 fine help address this market failure?arrow_forwardIn the past, some counties and countries have imposed taxes on sugar, saturated fats, and food made with those ingredients as a way to reduce consumption of those foods. Assume the government imposes a unit tax on all chocolate. Answer the following questions: Will consumers be able to shift this tax to sellers? If yes explain why/how. If no explain why not. Based on your answer to c, who will bear the incidence of this tax?arrow_forwardA tax policy analyst proposes that we should eliminate exemptions from taxes on food andmedicine (i.e., we should start taxing these goods) because taxes on these goods would be anefficient way to raise revenue.a. What do you think the analyst means when she says that taxing these items would bean efficient way to raise revenue? b. Is the analyst correct that taxing food and medicine would be an efficient way to raiserevenue? Draw a diagram to help explain. Hint: Think about the demand curve for thesegoods.c. Why might there be little political support for such a policyarrow_forward
- Suppose that the government imposes a per-unit tax on cell phones. The tax is imposed on producers of cell phones and the amount of the tax is $50 per cell phone. The following graph shows the effect of the tax. Use the graph to answer the following questions. a) How much of the tax per cell phone is paid by producers? How much of the tax per cell phone is paid by consumers? b) How much tax revenue (in total) does the government collect from the tax imposed on cell phones? c) What is the amount of the deadweight loss due to the presence of the tax on cell phones?arrow_forwardSuppose that the government imposes a per-unit tax on cell phones. The tax is imposed on producers of cell phones and the amount of the tax is $50 per cell phone. The following graph shows the effect of the tax. Use the graph to answer the following questions. a) What is the equilibrium P* and Q* before the imposition of the tax? b) How many cell phones per year are sold after the tax has been imposed? What price per cell phone do consumers pay after the tax has been imposed? c) What price do producers receive per cell phone after the tax is paid?arrow_forwardThe following graph shows the weekly market for sweatpants in some hypothetical economy. Suppose the government levies a tax of $10.15 per pair. The tax places a wedge between the price buyers pay and the price sellers receive. Complete the following table by filling in the quantity sold, the price buyers pay, and the price sellers receive before and after the tax. Quantity Price Buyers Pay Price Sellers Receive (Pairs of sweatpants) (Dollars per pair) (Dollars per pair) Before Tax After Tax Using your answers from the previous table, calculate the tax burden that falls on buyers and on sellers, respectively, and calculate the price elasticity of demand and supply over the relevant ranges using the midpoint method. Enter your results in the following table. Tax Burden Elasticity (Dollars per pair) Buyers Sellers The tax burden falls more heavily on the side of the market…arrow_forward
- What does the following mean: “Nothing in life is free”? Illustrate this point. (Do not use a demand and supply diagram.)arrow_forwardDuring a discussion several year; ago on building a pipeline to Alaska to carry natural gas, the U.S. Senate passed a bill stipulating mat there should be a guaranteed minimum price for the natural gas that would flow through line pipeline. The thinking behind the bill was that if private firms had a guaranteed price for their natural gas, they would be more willing to drill for gas and to pay to build the pipeline. Using the demand and supply framework, predict the effects of this price floor on fine price, quantity demanded, and quantity supplied. With the enactment of this price floor for natural gas, what are some of the likely unintended consequences in line market? Suggest some policies other than the price floor that he government can pursue if it wishes to encourage drilling for natural gas and fur a new pipeline in Alaska.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax