EBK OM
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781305888210
Author: Collier
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 2PA
Summary Introduction
Interpretation: Decisions need to be made whether the company should go for outsourcing or in-house production.
Concept Introduction: The total cost of production or outsourcing and breakeven point are useful quantifiable measures which help the company in making operational decisions which affect the company profits.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Shoeless Joe is a specialty retailer that is deciding where tolocate a new facility. Th e annual fi xed and variable costs for eachpossible site have been estimated as follows:
If demand is expected to be 2000 units, which location is best?
A small firm produces and sells novelty items in a five-barangay area. The firm expects toconsolidate assembly of its greeting cards line at a single location. Currently, operations are in three widelyscattered locations. The leading candidate for location will have a monthly fixed cost of Php 42,000 andvariable costs of Php3 per card. Card sell for Pho7 each. Prepare a table that shows total profits, fixed costs,
variable costs, and revenues for monthly volumes of 10,000, 12,000, and 15,000 units. What is the break-even point?
An operations manager wants to use factor rating method to decide the location of a new restaurant. Weights of the three factors specified, and the scores of two options are shown in the table below. Which option should the operations manager choose and what is the weighted score of this option?
Factor
Weight
Option 1 Score
Option 2 Score
Proximity to the University
0.5
90
80
Rental Cost
0.3
80
100
Size
0.2
70
70
Option 2, weighted score = 84
Option 2, weighted score = 83
Option 1, weighted score = 83
There is no difference between the two options
Option 1, weighted score = 84
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forward
- The fixed and variable costs for three potential manufacturing plant sites for a rattan chair weaver are shown: Site Fixed Cost Per Year Variable Cost per Unit 1 $600 $11.00 2 $1,000 $5.00 3 $2,100 $3.00 Part 2 a) After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 1 is best below 67 550 0 67 units. Part 3 After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 2 is best between 67 550 0 67 and 550 67 550 0 units. Part 4 After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 3 is best above 550 67 0 550 units. Part 5 b) If the demand is 57 units, then the best location for the potential manufacturing plant is SITE 1 SITE 3 SITE 2 SITE 1 .arrow_forwardSean Willems has evaluated the vendors in Table S11.3 as well as F ricker V-Tech, the vendor in Problem( Referring to Problem S 11.1 2, Sean Willems, in additionto the two possible vendors evaluated in Table S11.3,has found a third possible vendor. He now wants to evaluate all three vendors using the weights in Table S 11 .3. He scores the third vendor, Fricker V-Tech, Ltd., as: Engineering Competence5, Process Capabili ty 5, Cost I, Quality 5, Performance to Schedule 4, and After-Sales Service I . Which vendor has the highest score? ),but the Quality Control Manager says that new da ta suggest thatSiemsen Systems, Inc.'s quality has deteriorated, a nd Siemsen should now score a 2 in the Quality category. Which of the three vendors now has the highest score?arrow_forwardSap Manufacturing, a manufacturing company that manufactures football jerseys and located in Port Antonio, Jamaica, is preparing to build a new plant. J’s is considering three potential locations that are suitable for the construction of the plant. The fixed and variable costs for the three alternative locations are presented in the table below. Costs A B C Fixed Costs ($) 700,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 Variable ($ per unit) 28 20 18 Identify the range over which each alternative (A, B and C) is best. A manufacturing firm is considering three potential locations for a new parts manufacturing facility. A consulting firm has assessed three sites based on the four factors supplied by management as critical to the location's success. The factor weights and the consultant team scores are given in table 5 below. Scores are based on 50 = best. Locations Factors Weights A B C Labor Climate 10 35 45 20 Taxes 30 30 40 40 Utilities 20 25 20…arrow_forward
- We need to find better places to sell our product. I have three ideas we could pursue, but each one requires a six month commitment. We also have our$1,200budget constraint, which must cover any required location permits. Review the location choices to your right. Remember the cost for any permits will be deducted from the$1,200marketing budget. Great ideas Ariel, but I'm not sure which one would be best. What do you think, ? Silas Lee Which question would you like to ask before making your decision?City Center Park Cost: \$600 for a six-month permit Considerations - Downtown city center park within walking distance of many large corporate office buildings. - This is a very popular park. When the weather is good many business people tend to congregate and eat lunch here. - Several other food trucks do frequent this area.Which community events this past summer generated the most sales? Any ideas why? How would you and Ariel describe the demographics of our past customers?arrow_forwardDobb's Ltd Wants to choose the best location for its new aluminum plant. The manager ofproductions and operations has three possible locations to choose from. His assistantrecommends that he use break-even analysis location technique to help determine whichlocation is best based on costs. Assuming: Total fixed cost = 80,000 Price per unit= 20 AVC (Average variable cost) = 40 Break-even point= Total fixed cost / (AVC-Price per unit) Break-even point = 80,000/ (40-20) Break-even point = 4,000 1) Demonstrate to the OM manager using graph how to go about choosing the best location using thenumerical example designed above.arrow_forwardThe piece of land available is situated on the main road through the area and has great views of MountKinabalu on one side and the valley below on the other side. As the strategic advisor you have been asked to come up with a recommendation whether to develop a 4-star or 5-star property. Due to the fact that the area is near a World Heritage site and due to building height restrictions the total number of rooms for a 4-star hotel would be 300 rooms, whilst for a 5-star property the number of rooms would be 190. Identify at least THREE (3) strengths and weaknesses each and at least TWO (2) opportunities and threats each for the proposed hotel/resort at that area. (Not for Mount Kinabalu as a tourist attraction!)arrow_forward
- Mark has just been fired as the college bookstore manager for setting prices too low (only 20 percent above suggested retail). He is considering opening a competing bookstore near the campus, and he has begun an analysis of the situation. There are two possible sites under consideration. One is relatively small, while the other is large. If he opens at Site 1 and demand is good, he will generate a profit of P50,000. If demand is low, he will lose 10,000. If he opens at Site 2 and demand is high, he will generate a profit of $80,000, but he will lose P30,000 if demand is low. He also has the option of not opening at either site. He believes that there is a 50 percent chance that demand will be high. A market research study will cost $5,000. The probability of a good demand given a favorable study is 0.8. The probability of a good demand given an unfavorable study is 0.1. There is a 60 percent chance that the study will be favorable. (a) Should Mark use the study? Why or why not? (b) If…arrow_forwardTwo alternative locations are under consideration for a new plant: Jackson, Mississippi, and Dayton, Ohio. The Jackson location is superior in terms of costs. However, management believes that sales volume would decline if this location were chosen because it is farther from the market, and the firm’s customers prefer local suppliers. The selling price of the product is $250 per unit in either case. Use the following information to determine which location yields the higher total profit per year: Location AnnualFixed Cost Variable Costper Unit ForecastDemand per Year Jackson Dayton $1,500,000 $2,800,000 $50 $85 30,000 units 40,000 unitsarrow_forwardMark has just been fired as the university bookstore manager for setting prices too low (only 20 percentabove suggested retail). He is considering opening a competing bookstore near the campus, and he hasbegun an analysis of the situation. There are two possible sites under consideration. One is relativelysmall while the other is large. If he opens at Site 1 and demand is good, he will generate a profit of$50,000. If demand is low, he will lose $10,000. If he opens at Site 2 and demand is high he willgenerate a profit of $80,000, but he will lose $30,000 if demand is low. He also has decided that he willopen at one of these sites. He believes that there is a 60 percent chance that demand will be high. Heassigns the following utilities to the different profits:U(50,000) = 0.72 U(-10,000) = 0.22U(80,000) = 1 U(-30,000) = 0Using expected utility theory, what should Mark do?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning