(a)
Explanation of Solution
According the Categorical Imperative:
Categorical Imperative:
Categorical imperative signifies a complete requirement or a law that must be followed in all situations and is acceptable as an end in it.
Categorical imperative: Refers to “true at all time and also in all situations”
Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals products; while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson wants the former to be honest and complains to the owner.
As per categorical imperative, the salesperson is involved in unethical (dishonest) practices. If he wants the other salesperson to be honest he must follows the guidelines in all situations...
(b)
Explanation of Solution
According to Utilitarian Perspective:
Utilitarian perspective:
Utilitarianism is nothing but a moral theory that states that the greatest act is the one that increases utility.
Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals things, while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson accepts his mistakes to the owner and pays back the money.
As per utilitarian perspective, the salesperson’s work is not only to attain the goal; he should also need to maintain the shop’s image...
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
Using MIS (10th Edition)
- Should net neutrality be preserved? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardIn recent years, the Internet has swiftly developed into a crucial instrument that may be used by individuals to exercise their right to freedom of speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment. Some people are spreading hate speech via social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. This is an unfortunate reality. Should there be no limits placed on people's ability to express themselves freely on the internet? What measures need to be taken by social media platforms in order to stop the propagation of anti-Semitic content?arrow_forwardAs more time passes, an increasing number of individuals are turning to the internet in order to exercise their rights to free speech under the First Amendment. Facebook and Twitter are being used by a diverse spectrum of users and organisations to facilitate the dissemination of hate speech. When taking into account the nature of the medium, should there be any limitations placed on free expression on the internet? Is it essential to place restrictions on the ability to express hatred on social media platforms?arrow_forward
- Is it unethical to go to a store to examine a product, and then order it on the Internet for a lower price? Give arguments for a yes and for a no answer. Then take a position and explain why it is the correct one. When you take a position, also describe what ethical view (covered in class) you used.arrow_forwardDemonstrate how someone's right to free speech may be infringed upon by the ownership of a trademark. How can these seemingly opposing viewpoints be reconciled?arrow_forwardApply what you know about normative ethics by making an argument for or against letting students with rasta hair attend our high schools.arrow_forward
- Apply your understanding of normative ethics to the debate about whether or not high schoolers with rasta hair should be allowed to enroll.arrow_forwardShow how someone's trademark may make it harder for them to exercise their constitutionally granted right to free speech. How can we establish common ground between two seemingly contradictory points of view?arrow_forwardShow how trademark ownership may violate free speech. How can these opposing views be reconciled?arrow_forward
- Is it ethical for countries to conduct extensive surveillance of their citizens? a) If it is ethical, are there any limits to what they can do, and why? b) If it is not ethical, why is it not ethical? Is it the case that our current justice system is as good as can be done?arrow_forwardUse your knowledge of normative ethics to make a case for or against letting students with rasta hair join our high schools.arrow_forwardThe use of the Internet has evolved to the point where it is now an indispensable instrument for exercising one's right to free speech. It's standard practise for people to use hate speech to spread on social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Should there be no restrictions placed on the right to free speech for those who use the internet? The operators of social media platforms need to carefully assess the extent to which they may cut down on the number of negative comments they publish.arrow_forward
- Database System ConceptsComputer ScienceISBN:9780078022159Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. SudarshanPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationStarting Out with Python (4th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780134444321Author:Tony GaddisPublisher:PEARSONDigital Fundamentals (11th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780132737968Author:Thomas L. FloydPublisher:PEARSON
- C How to Program (8th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780133976892Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey DeitelPublisher:PEARSONDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337627900Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage LearningProgrammable Logic ControllersComputer ScienceISBN:9780073373843Author:Frank D. PetruzellaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education