Using MIS (10th Edition)
Using MIS (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9780134606996
Author: David M. Kroenke, Randall J. Boyle
Publisher: PEARSON
Expert Solution & Answer
Book Icon
Chapter 7.4, Problem 1EGDQ

(a)

Explanation of Solution

According the Categorical Imperative:

Categorical Imperative:

Categorical imperative signifies a complete requirement or a law that must be followed in all situations and is acceptable as an end in it.

Categorical imperative: Refers to “true at all time and also in all situations”

Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals products; while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson wants the former to be honest and complains to the owner.

As per categorical imperative, the salesperson is involved in unethical (dishonest) practices. If he wants the other salesperson to be honest he must follows the guidelines in all situations...

(b)

Explanation of Solution

According to Utilitarian Perspective:

Utilitarian perspective:

Utilitarianism is nothing but a moral theory that states that the greatest act is the one that increases utility.

Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals things, while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson accepts his mistakes to the owner and pays back the money.

As per utilitarian perspective, the salesperson’s work is not only to attain the goal; he should also need to maintain the shop’s image...

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
Is war driving legal? Research the legality of war driving in your home state. Is it considered illegal? Or is the law a gray area? Is it an ethical issue? Do you think war driving should be legal or illegal? What should the penalties be? Defend your position.
As a consequence, the usage of the Internet has evolved into a necessary instrument for expressing one's right to free speech. Hate speech is extensively spread via social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, which are misused by a great number of people and even organisations. Should there be no restrictions on people's freedom to freely express themselves on the internet? When it comes to permitting abusive comments on social media sites, where should the line be drawn?
Demonstrate how someone's right to free speech may be at odds with their ownership of a trademark. How can we find common ground among these seemingly incompatible viewpoints?
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780134444321
Author:Tony Gaddis
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780132737968
Author:Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780133976892
Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337627900
Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:9780073373843
Author:Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education