EBK MICROECONOMICS
21st Edition
ISBN: 8220103960151
Author: McConnell
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 4P
To determine
Efficiency of choice.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Suppose a person has a total credit card debt of $1,100 that has a 11 % yearly interest rate. This person also has a savings account with $5,500
that pays 1 % interest per year. Despite the net loss, the person keeps both.
Calculate how many times the person appreciates the $1 of savings more than $1 of credit card debt if the person relates similarly to both values of
percent paid and received, Enter your answer in the box below and round to two decimal places if necessary.
Answer
Keypad
Keyboard Shortcuts
times
Joanne has just completed high school and is trying to determine whether to go to communtiy college for two years or go directly to work. Her objective is to maximize the savings she will have in the bank five years from now.
If she goes directly to work, she will earn $18,500 per year for each of the next five years. If she goes to community college, for each of the next two years she will earn nothing—indeed, she will have to borrow $6,000 each year to cover tuition and books. This loan must be repaid in full three years after graduation. If she graduates from community college, in each of the subsequent three years, her wages will be $35,000 per year. Joanne’s total living expenses and taxes, excluding tuition and books, equal $15,000 per year.
Joanne should go to (Click to select) work junior college , since the total value of Joanne's savings would be $__ if she goes directly to work and $__ if she goes to community college.
Suppose Dalia is a sports fan and buys only football tickets. Dalia deposits $3,000 into a savings account that pays an annual nominal interest rate of
5%. Assume this interest rate is fixed, and so it will not change over time. On the day she makes her deposit, suppose that a football ticket has a
price of $15.00.
Initially, Dalia's $3,000 deposit has a purchasing power of
200 football tickets.
For each of the annual inflation rates given in the following table, first determine the new price of a football ticket, assuming it rises at the rate of
inflation. Then enter the corresponding purchasing power of Dalia's deposit after one year in the first row of the table for each inflation rate. Finally,
enter the value for the real interest rate at each of the given inflation rates.
Hint: Round your answers in the first row down to the nearest football ticket. For example, if you find that the deposit will cover 20.7 football tickets,
you would round the purchasing power down to 20 football…
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose Dariya is a fan of young-adult fiction and buys only young-adult books. Dariya deposits $4,000 into a savings account that pays an annual nominal interest rate of 5%. Assume this interest rate is fixed, and so it will not change over time. On the day she makes her deposit, suppose that a young-adult book has a price of $10.00. Initially, Dariya's $4,000 deposit has a purchasing power of young-adult books. For each of the annual inflation rates given in the following table, first determine the new price of a young-adult book, assuming it rises at the rate of inflation. Then enter the corresponding purchasing power of Dariya's deposit after one year in the first row of the table for each inflation rate. Finally, enter the value for the real interest rate at each of the given inflation rates. Hint: Round your answers in the first row down to the nearest young-adult book. For example, if you find that the deposit will cover 20.7 young-adult books, you would round the purchasing…arrow_forwardSuppose a person has a total credit card debt of $1,380 that has a 15 % yearly interest rate. This person also has a savings account with $3,000 that pays 3 % interest per year. Despite the net loss, the person keeps both. Calculate how many times the person appreciates the $1 of savings more than $1 of credit card debt if the person relates similarly to both values of percent paid and received. Enter your answer in the box below and round to two decimal places if necessary. Answer 2 Pan E Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts timesarrow_forward3. Which lottery payout scheme is better? Suppose you win a raffle held at a neighborhood elementary school fundraiser and are given the choice between two different ways to be paid. You can either accept the money in a lump sum immediately or in a series of payments over time. If you choose the lump sum payout, you receive $3,100 today. If you choose to collect payments over time, you receive three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. At an interest rate of 7% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the value. At an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting since that choice has the greater present O The lump sum is always better. O The payments over time are always better. O It will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. O None of these answers is good advice. , since it has the greater present value. A couple years after you win the raffle, you and your friend are back at the…arrow_forward
- Helena earns $2000 this year and will earn $1500 the next year. The interest rate between each year is 10%. She wants to consume the same quantity each year. She wants to have spent all her money by the end of year 2. Warning: each question does build on each other How much would she save? How much would she consume? If she wins the lottery during the first year, raising her earnings to $10000 this year, how much would she save, how much would she consume? If she now wants to consume twice as much in year 1 as she does in year 2, how much would she save, how much would she consume? If she now has no preferences about her consumption, but she wants to save $5000 in year 1 (to buy a new car in year 2), how much would she consume in year 1 and year2?arrow_forward3. Which lottery payout scheme is better? Suppose you win a raffle held at a neighborhood elementary school fundraiser and are given the choice between two different ways to be paid. You can either accept the money in a lump sum immediately or in a series of payments over time. If you choose the lump sum payout, you receive $3,100 today. If you choose to collect payments over time, you receive three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. At an interest rate of 7% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the value. At an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting I O The lump sum is always better. The payments over time are always better. O It will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. None of these answers is good advice. since that choice has the greater present since it has the greater present value. A couple years after you win the raffle, you and your friend are back at the same…arrow_forwardJoanne has just completed high school and is trying to determine whether to go to junior college for two years or go directly to work. Her objective is to maximize the savings she will have in the bank five years from now. If she goes directly to work, she will earn $22,000 per year for each of the next five years. If she goes to junior college, for each of the next two years she will earn nothing—indeed, she will have to borrow $6,000 each year to cover tuition and books. This loan must be repaid in full three years after graduation. If she graduates from junior college, in each of the subsequent three years, her wages will be $41,000 per year. Joanne’s total living expenses and taxes, excluding tuition and books, equal $15,000 per year. Instructions: Enter your responses as whole numbers. a. Suppose, for simplicity, that Joanne can borrow and lend at 0 percent interest. On purely economic grounds, should she go to junior college or work? After 5 years, the total value of…arrow_forward
- Joanne has just completed high school and is trying to determine whether to go to junior college for two years or go directly to work. Her objective is to maximize the savings she will have in the bank five years from now. If she goes directly to work, she will earn $22,000 per year for each of the next five years. If she goes to junior college, for each of the next two years she will earn nothing—indeed, she will have to borrow $6,000 each year to cover tuition and books. This loan must be repaid in full three years after graduation. If she graduates from junior college, in each of the subsequent three years, her wages will be $41,000 per year. Joanne’s total living expenses and taxes, excluding tuition and books, equal $15,000 per year. Instructions: Enter your responses as whole numbers. a. Suppose, for simplicity, that Joanne can borrow and lend at 0 percent interest. On purely economic grounds, should she go to junior college or work? After 5 years, the total value of…arrow_forwardSuppose you have a monthly income of $1000, $850 in monthly expenses, and you can put money in a savings account that yields a monthly interest rate of 4%. Now suppose you have an opportunity to invest your money at a 12% return. Further suppose you are able to borrow at 3%. Assuming you invest all of your money and then borrow against your future payout, show your trade-off between present and future consumption. If you still need to consume $850 in the present, how much will you have to spend in the future?arrow_forward3. Which lottery payout scheme is better? Suppose you win a raffle held at a minor league baseball game and are given the choice between two different ways to be paid. You can either accept the money in a lump sum immediately or in a series of payments over time. If you choose the lump sum payout, you receive $3,000 today. If you choose to collect payments over time, you receive three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. At an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the value. , since that choice has the greater present O The lump sum is always better. The payments over time are always better. O It will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. O None of these answers is good advice. At an interest rate of 10% per year, the winner would be better off accepting A couple years after you win the raffle, you and your friend are back at the same event. This time, your friend gets lucky and wins the…arrow_forward
- 3. Which lottery payout scheme is better? Suppose you win a raffle held at a neighborhood elementary school fundraiser and are given the choice between two different ways to be paid. You can either accept the money in a lump sum immediately or in a series of payments over time. If you choose the lump sum payout, you receive $3,000 today. If you choose to collect payments over time, you receive three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today At an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the value. since that choice has the greater present At an interest rate of 10% per year, the winner would be better off accepting A couple years after you win the raffle, you and your friend are back at the same event. This time, your friend gets lucky and wins the contest, and you both realize the payout schemes are the same as they were back when you won. They now face the decision between collecting their prize as a lump sum or as a…arrow_forwardSuppose Latasha is a sports fan and buys only baseball caps. Latasha deposits $3,000 in a bank account that pays an annual nominal interest rate of 5%. Assume this interest rate is fixed-that is, it won't change over time. At the time of her deposit, a baseball cap is priced at $10.00. Initially, the purchasing power of Latasha's $3,000 deposit is baseball caps. For each of the annual inflation rates given in the following table, first determine the new price of a baseball cap, assuming it rises at the rate of inflation. Then enter the corresponding purchasing power of Latasha's deposit after one year in the first row of the table for each inflation rate. Finally, enter the value for the real interest rate at each of the given inflation rates. Hint: Round your answers in the first row down to the nearest baseball cap. For example, if you find that the deposit will cover 20.7 baseball caps, you would round the purchasing power down to 20 baseball caps under the assumption that Latasha…arrow_forward3. Consider a home energy storage (battery) system that can store up to 2 units of energy. At every time step, there is a demand for energy in the home which is drawn from 0,1,2 units with equal probability independent of the demands in the previous time steps. At every point in time, you have to satisfy the demand either by discharging the needed energy from the battery or purchasing power from the grid (or a combination of the two). You could also choose to purchase power from the grid to charge your battery. The grid energy price is either H(igh) or L(ow) according to a Markov chain (Price moves from H to L with probability p, and from L to H with probability q). (a) Model the decision making as an infinite horizon MDP where the objective is to minimize the discounted cost of energy purchased over an infinite horizon. (b) Write down a policy a of your choosing. Perform two steps of the operator T, for your policy, followed by one step of T..arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning