Whether the complicated discounted price scheme really make consumers better off or they are just the ways to increase profits.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8.5, Problem 1TTA

To determine

To find: Whether the complicated discounted price scheme really make consumers better off or they are just the ways to increase profits.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

GameZone, a video games store, is considering the best way to price two new games – a first-person shooter (FPS) and a racing game. There are four types of consumers that might buy the games with roughly equal numbers of each type, and their willingness to pay (WTP) for each game is detailed in the table below (assume that the willingness-to-pay for a second game of the same type is zero). How should Gamezone price the two games separately to maximise revenue? How should Gamezone price a bundle of both games to maximise revenue? Is there an alternative (involving bundling) that generates more revenue than either single prices or a bundle alone? Under what condition/s is bundling likely to increase profits for a firm? Consumer Type WTP for FPS game WTP for racing game A $120 $70 B $70 $120 C $160 $10 D $10 $160

Caroline and Frances are debating the pricing strategy of several airlines. Caroline argues, “When airlines restrict discounted tickets to people who book well in advance and stay over on a Saturday, it is not price discrimination, because the restrictions have nothing to do with individual buyers' willingness to pay.” However, Frances says, “The airlines' stay-over restrictions are a form of price discrimination, because they roughly split the market into two separate groups that are willing to pay two different amounts.” Economists generally agree with who?

I stumble on questions like this... Suppose a firm is charging $8 for the first six-pack of cola and $4 for the second six-pack of cola. This firm is using Multiple Choice third-degree price discrimination. first-degree price discrimination. second-degree price discrimination. first-, second- and third-degree price discrimination.