Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134492049
Author: Daron Acemoglu, David Laibson, John List
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 9, Problem 11P
(a)
To determine
The marginal social benefit when the temperature is
(b)
To determine
The limit of temperature to which it can be increased.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria, and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the selling price of each is $745,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel.
Willingness and Ability to Purchase
(Dollars)
Alyssa
720,000
Brian
690,000
Crystal
680,000
Nick
900,000
Rosa
810,000
Tim
770,000
Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply.
Alyssa
Brian
Crystal
Nick
Rosa
Tim
Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a price of $732,500. This fourth parcel _____________be sold…
Lane and Riley are the only two residents in a neighborhood, and they share the same driveway. They would like to have the driveway paved. The value of the paved driveway is $1,500 to Lane and $900 to Riley. Regardless of who pays for the paving both people will benefit from it.
If the cost of paving the driveway is $2,000 and Lane proposes that they each pay 50 percent of this cost, then Riley ______ agree to Lane’s proposal because ______.
A. will; repaving the driveway would increase total economic surplus
B. will not; repaving the driveway would lower total economic surplus
C. will; if they split the cost, then Riley’s economic surplus would increase
D. will not; if they split the cost, then Riley’s economic surplus would decrease
There are two people: Brandon, who is really, really good at cleaning front yards and mowing lawns; and Jim, who doesn’t have front yards or lawns in his current time and is worse than Brandon at both. In the course of a weekend, Brandon can clean ten front yards or mow five lawns. Jim, on the other hand, can clean only one front yard or mow only two lawns. Calculate the opportunity cost.
Chapter 9 Solutions
Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that MASU managed to get Olivia Rodrigo to play a concert at Convocation Hall. Tickets cost $600. At the same time, Gheorghe Zamfir (The Master of the Pan Flute) is playing in Brunton Auditorium. Tickets cost $50. You've always wanted to see Zamfir, and consistently told your friends that you would pay up to $250 to see him in concert. What is your economic cost of going to the Olivia Rodrigo concert? Please provide your answer in monetary terms and show your reasoning.arrow_forwardYou are a University student who must live off-campus in the second year. There are two types of one-bedroom apartment where you prefer to live because it is near the campus. One rents for $400 per month and the other $360. According to the University Students’ Housing Bureau 80 percent of apartments in the area consists of the $400 type while the remaining 20 percent are of the $360 type. You need to visit the apartments to discover the rent. Suppose the first apartment you visit cost $400 and the opportunity cost of your visit is $6 per visit. 1. If you are risk neutral person should you visit another apartment or rent the one you have found.2. Suppose you visit another apartment and find out that it rents for $400, should you visit another apartment?arrow_forwardEric and Kyle are fishermen with different equipment and, as a result, different costs for catching fish. Eric’s costs for catching fish are $1,000 per ton for the first five tons and then $2,500 per ton for any additional tons. Kyle can harvest fish at a cost of $3,000 for the first 15 tons and then $1,400 for any additional tons. a. If society wants 30 tons of fish and for some reason will only allow one of the two guys to do all the fishing, which one should society choose if it wants to minimize the cost of catching those 30 tons of fish? How much will the total cost of catching the fish be? What will the average cost per ton be for the 30 tons? b. If society wants 30 tons of fish and wants them for the least cost regardless of who catches them, how much should Eric and Kyle each catch? How much will the total cost of catching 30 tons be? What will the average cost per ton be for the 30 tons? c. Suppose that Eric and Kyle can both sell whatever amount of fish they catch for $3,000…arrow_forward
- Suppose that 2 roommates, Andy and Bob, are trying to pick an apartment in Chicago. Locations can be chosen from set of alternatives A={ x: x exists [0,1]}. Andy and Bob both want to minimize their daily commute but they work at different locations: Andy at xA=0.3, while Bob at xB=0.6. Specifically, their utility functions are: ui(x)= -(x-xi)2. Question: What is the set of all Pareto Efficient outcomes in A, assuming no money can be exchanged.arrow_forwardFive people get together for five nights at the beach. Dinner duty is distributed so that each person is assigned a night to buy and cook dinner and provide the wine. At the end of their stay, the receipts from the five nights will be summed up and each person will pay 1/5th of the total. These five people are all gourmands and each is trying to impress the other. Suppose that five different amounts can be spent on preparing a meal: 50, 80, 150, 250, and 400. As reported in the table below associated with each amount of expense is the benefit received by the person who made the meal and the benefit received by all of those who ate it (which includes the person who made it). For example, if 250 was spent on the meal, then the person who made it receives a total benefit of 280 (230 from cooking it and 50 from eating it) and each of the other four peoplereceive a benefit of 50 from eating it. A player’s payoff equals the benefitfrom making his or her meal plus the benefit from eating the…arrow_forwardOne type of systematic error arises because people tend to think of benefits in percentage terms rather than in absolute dollar amounts. As an example, Samir is willing to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $4 on a grocery item that costs $10 at a local market. But he is unwilling to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $10 on a laptop that costs $400 at a local store. In percentage terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? In absolute terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? If Samir is willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $4 in one case, shouldn’t he also be willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $10?arrow_forward
- In the movie Rebel Without a Cause, James Dean and Buzz Gunderson compete for thefavours of sixteen year old Judy. Buzz's gang members steal two cars. The group of teenagers gathers on aLos Angeles lookout, with a cliff that drops down to the Pacific Ocean. James and Buzz are to drive the stolencars toward the cliff. The first person to jump from his car is declared the chicken (which is bad). The lastperson to jump is the hero (which is good), capturing Judy's affection and the gang's respect. The driverlesscars continue over the cliff and plunge to the rocks at its base.Each driver can make two possible actions. Jump when he feels endangered (be a chicken) or jump AFTERthe other driver jumps (be a rooster). Assuming that both feel endangered at the same moment, the followingmatrix represents the payoffs for James and Buzz for each choice of strategy.BuzzChicken RoosterJames Chicken 3, 3 -10, 20Rooster 20, -10 -50, -50 PLEASE ANSWER THE BELOW QUESTION WITH REFERECE TO THE ABOVE…arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $10 and his value of the dog is $40. Lisa's value of the cat is $30 and her value of the dog is $20. a. What is the efficient pet? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. b. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] c. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] d. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is heads, what will Lisa choose?…arrow_forwardGrapes and bananas are perfect complements for Jane and Betty. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 20 grapes and 10 bananas and Betty had 10 grapes and 20 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1. Draw the Edgeworth box for Jane and Betty. Place Jane at the origin and Betty on the upside-down. Draw their endowment point and 45 degree line . (Grape on the horizontal axis and banana on the vertical)arrow_forward
- Elliot and Jordy find themselves on a deserted island. The only two activities available are fishing and finding pineapples. In a full day, Elliot can catch 6 fish or find 12 pineapples or some linear combination of the two; in the same time, Jordy can catch 4 fish or find 10 pineapples or some linear combination of the two. What are each individual’s marginal costs of fishing and finding pineapples? (must provide the correct answer for full credit, no additional work is necessary) Who has an absolute advantage in fish production? Who has an absolute advantage in finding pineapples? Briefly explain your reasoning. Who has a comparative advantage in fish production? Who has a comparative advantage in finding pineapples? Briefly explain your reasoning.arrow_forwardYou are considering whether you should go out to dinner at a restaurant with your friend. The meal is expected to cost you $40, you typically leave a 20% tip, and an Uber will cost you $5 to get there. You value the restaurant meal at $20. You enjoy your friend’s company and are willing to pay $30 just to spend an evening with her. If you did not go out to the restaurant, you would eat at home using groceries that cost you $8. How much are the benefits and costs associated with going out to dinner with your friend? Should you go out to dinner with your friend?arrow_forwardYour total benefits from spending time with your spouse are shown in the following table. Hours per Day Total Benefit 0 0 1 20 2 38 3 54 4 68 5 80 6 90 7 98 8 104 Alternatively, you have the option of working as many hours as you want, earning $11 per hour. Assume this is the next best use of your time. Use the marginal principle to find your optimal number of hours to spend with your spouse per day. The optimal amount of time for you to spend with your spouse is hours per day Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning