Postlab exp 8
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Southern California *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
105ALG
Subject
Chemistry
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by BailiffHyenaPerson995
Sample Calculation:
Trial 1: Rough trial (Not using for calculation and result analysis)
Trial 2: Initial reading of burette: 28.36 mL = 0.02836L;
final burette reading: 45.79 mL = 0.04579L
Volume delivered: 0.04579L - 0.02836L = 0.01743L
0.01743
LNaOH ×
0.490
mol
L
=
0.0085407
mol
=
0.00854
mol NaOH
H C
2
H
3
O
2
+
NaOH→ NaC
2
H
3
O
2
+
H
2
O
The numbers of moles of NaOH equals the number of moles of acetic acid in the
vinegar sample.
0.00854 mol
HC
2
H
3
O
2
M
(HC
2
H
3
O
2
)
×V
(HC
2
H
3
O
2
)
=M
(NaOH)
×V
(NaOH)
0.00854
mol HC
2
H
3
O
2
÷
0.010
L
=
0.854
M
=
0.85
M HC
2
H
3
O
2
Mass percent:
60.04
g
mol
HC
2
H
3
O
2
×
0.8
´
54
mol
L
=
51.278
g
L
=
5.1%
Mass
%
Acidity
=
massHC
2
H
3
O
2
massvinegar
×
100%
=
60.04
g
mol
×
0.00854
mol
1.005
g
mL
×
10
mL
×
100%
=
5.1019%
=
5.1%
Trial 3: 0.8624 M = 0.86 M
HC
2
H
3
O
2
; Mass % = 5.15209% = 5.2%
Trial 4: 0.8526 M = 0.85 M
HC
2
H
3
O
2
; Mass % = 5.09354% = 5.1%
Trial 5: 0.85064 M = 0.85 M
HC
2
H
3
O
2
; Mass % = 5.0818% = 5.1%
Average Molarity of
HC
2
H
3
O
2
= (0.85407+0.8624+0.8526+085064)/4 =
0.8549275 = 0.85 M
Average Mass %
HC
2
H
3
O
2
=
0.0510190647
+
0.0515208915
+
0.0509354269
+
0.0508183339
4
×
100%
=
5
.
107342925
=
5.1%
Standard deviation of Molarity of
HC
2
H
3
O
2
=
.8624
−
.8549275
¿
¿
¿
2
+(
.85260
−
.8549275
)
2
+(
.85064
−
.8549275
)
2
¿
(
0.85407
−
0.8549275
)
2
+
¿
¿
√
¿
% RSD of Molarity
HC
2
H
3
O
2
=
0.0052
0.8549275
×
100%
=
0.60824
=
0.61%
Standard deviation of Mass %
HC
2
H
3
O
2
= 0.0309563
% RSD of Mass %
HC
2
H
3
O
2
= 0.606113599 = 0.61%
Results:
Trial 1
(Rough)
Trial 2
Trial 3
Trial 4
Trial 5
Average
M of
HC
2
H
3
O
2
//
0.85
M
0.86 M
0.85
M
0.85
M
//
Mass %
//
5.1%
5.2%
5.1%
5.1%
//
Average
M of
HC
2
H
3
O
2
//
//
//
//
//
0.85
M
Stdev of
M of
HC
2
H
3
O
2
//
//
//
//
//
0.0052
% RSD of
M of
HC
2
H
3
O
2
//
//
//
//
//
0.61%
Average
Mass %
//
//
//
//
//
5.1%
Stdev of
Mass %
HC
2
H
3
O
2
//
//
//
//
//
0.030956
3
% RSD of
//
//
//
//
//
0.61%
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
A researcher has developed a new analytical method to determine the percent by mass
iron in solids. To test the new method, the researcher purchases a standard reference
material sample that is 2.85% iron by mass. Analysis of the iron standard returns values of
2.75%, 2.89%, 2.77%, 2.81%, and 2.87%. Are the results of the new method significantly
different from the standard reference sample? (Hint: Use Confidence Interval)
arrow_forward
Eight replicate measurements were made on a test solution producing the following results for
the concentration of sodium ion (mg/L):
63.91, 65.92, 69.98, 64.24, 65.45, 65.82, 66.51, 65.11.
The value 69.98 is an outlier suspect. A Q-test at 95% confidence level will lead to this conclusion
with respect to the suspect value:
O Should be thrown away
Should not be thrown away
There is not enough data to draw a conclusion
None of the above
arrow_forward
0.3414 grams of sample (crushed aspirin tablet) was weighed and dissolved in 25 mL ethanol. This solution was transferred into a 100
mL volumetric flask and filled to the mark with deionized water. 20 mL of the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm pore filter and 503 μL of
the filtered sample solution was diluted so, that the final volume of the solution was 12 mL.
This sample solution and calibration solutions with known concentration of acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) were injected (injection volume 20 μL)
into a HPLC and the following peak areas were measured (expressed as averages from three separate chromatographic runs):
Solution
Cal 1
Cal 2
Cal 3
Cal 4
Cal 5
Sample
Structure of ASA:
C(ASA) (mg/L)
0
OH
B
53.5
105.9
140.9
195.4
247.4
Average weight of the tablet was estimated as 591.9 mg.
What is the mass of ASA in one tablet? Please give the answer with 4 significant digits. Be sure you present the result with units!
Peak area (mA.s)
4995
9953
12941
17271
22179
10467.3
arrow_forward
Based on this. What was the percentage error in the percentage of water in the sample, compared to pure MgSO4•7H2O?
arrow_forward
None
arrow_forward
Solve the equation
arrow_forward
une
Emmanuel
Lab Partner(s): Martin k / Martin 0
Data Sheet
volume of unknown sample (mL)
mass of filter paper (g)
mass of filter paper + solid Ba3(PO4)2(g)
Calculation:
mass of solid Ba3(PO4)2 (g)
1.885 - 0.5-1.315
Calculation:
molar mass of Ba3(PO4)2 (g/mol)
737.33 (3)+30.97(2)+8(16)
moles of Ba3(PO4)2
Calculation:
1323C
Calculation:
moles of BaCl2
Stoichiometry Lab
400mL
0.57 g
0.1.885
1.329
arrow_forward
Part C: Determine percent Oxalic Acid in Unknown Sample
Molar mass of oxalic acid
90.03
g/mol
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average
Precision
Mass of unknown oxalic acid (g)
1.0048
0.9995
1.0018
---
Volume (mL) of Standardized KMNO4 used
Moles of KMnO4
10.03
9.85
10.45
---
---
---
Moles of oxalic acid (H2C204 • 2H2O)
---
---
grams of oxalic acid (H2C204 • 2H2O) (g)
percent oxalic acid (%)
---
---
Show calculations:
arrow_forward
I need help on questions 1-2? If you can't help me on question 2, then you can help me on question 1.
arrow_forward
Name:
Date:
Section:
Data Report Sheet: Analysis of an Unknown Chloride
Unknown #
-2
Molarity of Standard Ag(NO), 5.2167x10 M
Trial I
Trial II
Trial III
Mass of Unknown
0.237
o. 232 g
g
Initial Burette
Reading
0.00
mL
7.90
mL
mL
Final Burette
Reading
31.00 mL
42.00 mL
mL
Vol. Ag(NO3)
Added
31.00 mL
34.10 mL
mL
Moles Ag(NO,)
1.617177y10 mol.
1,7789 v10 mol.
Moles CI
1.617177x103mdl.
Mass Cl
0.05741 8
0g
24.22 %
27.22%
Cl in Unknown
Average % Cl in unknown 25.720%
arrow_forward
I want the best value for percent purity and how did you arrive at the best value
arrow_forward
Acetic acid percentages in five vinegar samples were 4.98, 4.86, 4.97, 4.99. 5.08, 5.11, 4.97, 5.32 and 4.89. Could we reject any of these values with 95% confidence?
Q critical =
experimental Q =
Therefore (yes or no) the suspicious data can be rejected (write the value of the data that can be deleted, example 5.08).
arrow_forward
You have run analysis on an unknown acetaminophen sample. Your results showed the concentration of acetaminophen in the unknown was 35.9%. The actual concentration of acetaminophen in the unknown was 49.0%. What is the error % for this analysis? Answer to 1 decimal place.
arrow_forward
A solution is prepared by diluting 2.81 mL of the blue dye stock solution to 25.00 mL. The measured absorbance for the prepared solution is listed in the data
table.
Measurement
Result
Blue dye stock solution
0.293 M
Absorbance at 630 nm
0.00265
Calibration curve
y=0.0833x
Part: 0/3
Part 1 of 3
What is the theoretical molar concentration? Round your answer to 3 significant digits.
[Blue]theoretical-M
x10
X
S
Part: 1/3
Part 2 of 3
What is the experimental molar concentration? Round your answer to 3 significant digits.
[Blue ] experimental M
9
Subm
Ⓒ2022 McGraw Hill LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Cent
arrow_forward
Complete the table below wuth complete solution.
arrow_forward
I need help on questions 2-3?
arrow_forward
Given:
Trial 1
25.00
0.00
10.40
10.40
Trial 2
25.0
10.40
20.13
9.73
Volume of Ca(OH)2 (mL)
Initial burette reading (mL)
Final burette reading (mL)
Volume of HCl used in titration (mL)
answer in 3 significant figures.
Trial 3
25.0
20.13
30.29
(a) write the neutralization reaction
involved in the experiment.
(b) Calculate the molarity of Ca2+
(M). Show the complete solution.
10.16
arrow_forward
An excess of 0.34 mg Pb is obtained from an assay test determined in an analysis. What is the percent relative error in ppt if the mass of the sample is 550 g?
arrow_forward
An environmental scientist obtained the following replicate concentration measurements of methane (CH4) gas at a landfill site:
Replicate Measurements
CH4 Concentration (mg/m3)
1.0
0.1571
2.2
0.2031
3.0
0.1914
4.0
0.2103
Calculate % error when the scientific community accepts 0.2102 as true value.
arrow_forward
4. Assuming no calculation errors, why would a percent recovery > 100% or a percent recovery < 100% be obtained? Give at least one reason for each
arrow_forward
II. STANDARDIZATION OF NAOH SOLUTION
Table 3.4. Standardization of NaOH solution.
Trial 1
Conditions
Trial 2
Primary standard
Weight of flask, g
Weight of flask + KHP, g
Weight of KHP,g
NaOH solution
Final volume reading, mL
Initial volume reading, mL
123.4568
122.4567
123.7072
122.7208
25.50
32.40
0.00
5.50
Volume used, mL
Normality of NaOH solution
arrow_forward
Determine the amount in grams of KCI that exists in 20.3
g of a solution that contains 1.14
% KCl by mass
X
STARTING AMOUNT
RESET
3
ANSWER
ADD FACTOR
* ( )
0.001
1000
%m KCI
6.022 x 10²3
20.3
mol KCI
74.55
17.8
g solution
100
1.14
g KCI
1450
1
g KCl/mol
0.272
10
0.014
23.1
0.231
0.1
0.01
Tap here or pull up for additional resources
arrow_forward
I need help finding the %Composition for %cychohexane and %toluene. The formula (area of peak/total area) * 100%
arrow_forward
NaOH Concentration (M): 0.09669M
Trial 1:
Inital Volume of NaOH: 0.55mL
Final Volume of NaOH: 28.25 mL
Trail 2:
Intial Volume of NaOH: 18.1 mL
Final Volume of NaOH: 46.1 mL
Concentration of HCl Solution
Subtract the initial buret reading from the end point reading. Convert the readings to liters by dividing by 1000.
Solve this equation for the concentration of HCl:
(CHCl) (0.01000 liters ) = (CNaOH) (volume of NaOH in liters).
CNaOH is the normality of the NaOH you recorded from the bottle.
Average the two HCl concentrations.
arrow_forward
Use your average AA concentration to calculate the mass percent of acetic acid in vinegar.
arrow_forward
Data Table
Final buret reading
Initial buret reading
Volume used
Sample 1
Vinegar Base Vinegar
Sample 2
Sample 3
(if needed)
Base
Vinegar
Base
JOML
Som
0,05
110mL/802 10ML 884
JUML 0.00 10μL OML
Tome 0.00
10mL 80.2 mL 10ML 88mL come some
*If a pipet is used to measure the volume of vinegar, record only in the space for volume used.
Molarity of base (NaOH) 1685 M Vinegar number
N/A
CALCULATIONS: In the spaces below, show calculation setups for Sample 1 only. Show
answers for both samples in the boxes.
1. Moles of base (NaOH)
2. Moles of acid (HC2H3O2) used to neutralize
(react with) the above number of moles of
base
3. Molarity of acetic acid in the vinegar
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
(if needed)
4. Average molarity of acetic acid in the vinegar
5. Grams of acetic acid per liter (from average molarity)
6. Mass percent acetic acid in vinegar sample
(density of vinegar = 1.005 g/mL)
- 252 -
arrow_forward
please help me with the answers and explain so I can understand. So, I got 0.12 but it is wrong please hepl me with this
arrow_forward
The molarity of a solution is determined by four separate titrations or replicates, where the obtained data was
0.4120, 0.4920, 0.3920, and 0.4320 M. Calculate the standard error of the mean for the above data.
O 0.00185
O 0.02160
O 0.43200
O 0.04320
O 0.01080
arrow_forward
2.00 mL OF
5.80 x10-"M AGNO g
245.0 mL
of 3.35 X10 M NazS
and
+ Na, Scaas
2 NANO3
tazy
248.19
1549
2709
2 Ag NO3
78.19
Nans
Agzs
2 NANO3
inirial
Change
Final
arrow_forward
alculate the approximate volume of the vinegar sample needed for the analyses (Part A.1).
Brand of vinegar or unknown no.
Colauita
tof White
Wine
Trial 1
1122809
Trial 2
Trial 1
Trial 2
e Guia
112.280g
(12.822g 112.796
115 565 lis.9
1. Mass of flask (g)
l15.603
2. Mass of flask + vinegar (g)
2.496
3.323
2,743 2,749
3. Mass of vinegar (g)
B. Analysis of Vinegar Sample
2mL
7.5
23mL 32.コ
1. Buret reading of NaOH, initial (mL)
5.25mL
13ML
amL
2. Buret reading of NaOH, final (mL)
33,3
31.2
1. Volume of NaOH used (mL)
2! mL a7.45 me
20.3
32.2
o i135
• 004
1 Molar concentration of NaOH (mol/L)
Oi135
• 00 3
1003
, 063
5. Moles of NaOH added (mol)
6. Moles of CH,COOH in vinegar (mol)
7. Mass of CH,COOH in vinegar (g)
8. Percent by mass of CH,COOH in vinegar (%)
9. Average percent by mass of CH,COOH
in vinegar (%)
Calculations for Trial 1 of the first vinegar sample on next page.
Experiment 10
137
arrow_forward
Calculate the pH of the following solutions
prepared by:
Part A
Dissolving 4.7 g of lithium hydroxide in water to give 290 mL of solution.
Express your answer to two decimal places.
pH-
Submit
Part B
Request Answer
Dissolving 0.91 g of hydrogen chloride in water to give 0.35 mL of solution.
Express your answer to two decimal places.
pH =
Submit
Bequest Answer
arrow_forward
A chemist measured the concentration of a solution three times and obtained the following
results (in mol/L): 0.0147, 0.0146, 0.0148. Do the results appear precise, accurate, or neither?
Explain.
avenge =.0147
(pdimus.co
120 Doy Jine
What information would you need for the results to be both precise and accurate?
If the true value is 0.0149, calculate the percent error.
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781259911156
Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305577213
Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9780078021558
Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079373
Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...
Chemistry
ISBN:9781118431221
Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:WILEY
Related Questions
- A researcher has developed a new analytical method to determine the percent by mass iron in solids. To test the new method, the researcher purchases a standard reference material sample that is 2.85% iron by mass. Analysis of the iron standard returns values of 2.75%, 2.89%, 2.77%, 2.81%, and 2.87%. Are the results of the new method significantly different from the standard reference sample? (Hint: Use Confidence Interval)arrow_forwardEight replicate measurements were made on a test solution producing the following results for the concentration of sodium ion (mg/L): 63.91, 65.92, 69.98, 64.24, 65.45, 65.82, 66.51, 65.11. The value 69.98 is an outlier suspect. A Q-test at 95% confidence level will lead to this conclusion with respect to the suspect value: O Should be thrown away Should not be thrown away There is not enough data to draw a conclusion None of the abovearrow_forward0.3414 grams of sample (crushed aspirin tablet) was weighed and dissolved in 25 mL ethanol. This solution was transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask and filled to the mark with deionized water. 20 mL of the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm pore filter and 503 μL of the filtered sample solution was diluted so, that the final volume of the solution was 12 mL. This sample solution and calibration solutions with known concentration of acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) were injected (injection volume 20 μL) into a HPLC and the following peak areas were measured (expressed as averages from three separate chromatographic runs): Solution Cal 1 Cal 2 Cal 3 Cal 4 Cal 5 Sample Structure of ASA: C(ASA) (mg/L) 0 OH B 53.5 105.9 140.9 195.4 247.4 Average weight of the tablet was estimated as 591.9 mg. What is the mass of ASA in one tablet? Please give the answer with 4 significant digits. Be sure you present the result with units! Peak area (mA.s) 4995 9953 12941 17271 22179 10467.3arrow_forward
- une Emmanuel Lab Partner(s): Martin k / Martin 0 Data Sheet volume of unknown sample (mL) mass of filter paper (g) mass of filter paper + solid Ba3(PO4)2(g) Calculation: mass of solid Ba3(PO4)2 (g) 1.885 - 0.5-1.315 Calculation: molar mass of Ba3(PO4)2 (g/mol) 737.33 (3)+30.97(2)+8(16) moles of Ba3(PO4)2 Calculation: 1323C Calculation: moles of BaCl2 Stoichiometry Lab 400mL 0.57 g 0.1.885 1.329arrow_forwardPart C: Determine percent Oxalic Acid in Unknown Sample Molar mass of oxalic acid 90.03 g/mol Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Average Precision Mass of unknown oxalic acid (g) 1.0048 0.9995 1.0018 --- Volume (mL) of Standardized KMNO4 used Moles of KMnO4 10.03 9.85 10.45 --- --- --- Moles of oxalic acid (H2C204 • 2H2O) --- --- grams of oxalic acid (H2C204 • 2H2O) (g) percent oxalic acid (%) --- --- Show calculations:arrow_forwardI need help on questions 1-2? If you can't help me on question 2, then you can help me on question 1.arrow_forward
- Name: Date: Section: Data Report Sheet: Analysis of an Unknown Chloride Unknown # -2 Molarity of Standard Ag(NO), 5.2167x10 M Trial I Trial II Trial III Mass of Unknown 0.237 o. 232 g g Initial Burette Reading 0.00 mL 7.90 mL mL Final Burette Reading 31.00 mL 42.00 mL mL Vol. Ag(NO3) Added 31.00 mL 34.10 mL mL Moles Ag(NO,) 1.617177y10 mol. 1,7789 v10 mol. Moles CI 1.617177x103mdl. Mass Cl 0.05741 8 0g 24.22 % 27.22% Cl in Unknown Average % Cl in unknown 25.720%arrow_forwardI want the best value for percent purity and how did you arrive at the best valuearrow_forwardAcetic acid percentages in five vinegar samples were 4.98, 4.86, 4.97, 4.99. 5.08, 5.11, 4.97, 5.32 and 4.89. Could we reject any of these values with 95% confidence? Q critical = experimental Q = Therefore (yes or no) the suspicious data can be rejected (write the value of the data that can be deleted, example 5.08).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781259911156Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationPrinciples of Instrumental AnalysisChemistryISBN:9781305577213Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. CrouchPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Organic ChemistryChemistryISBN:9780078021558Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.Publisher:McGraw-Hill EducationChemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage LearningElementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...ChemistryISBN:9781118431221Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. BullardPublisher:WILEY
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781259911156
Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305577213
Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9780078021558
Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079373
Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...
Chemistry
ISBN:9781118431221
Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:WILEY