Bromination of trans-cinnamic acid and trans-stilbene
INTRODUCTION
Determining how a mechanism comes to be is crucial as a scientist and arriving to conclusions is a crucial component which lead to examining and determining which mechanism takes place when two or more substrates are made to react. At the end of the experiment a mechanism was determined based on the purified product’s melting point. This was accomplished by having the reaction take place but also through acquiring the melting point and comparing the number to the melting point which was already established by the scientific community. (Q1) When 0.252 g of trans-cinnamic acid was mixed in 2.5 mL glacial acetic acid and 0.434g pyridinium tribromide was added, the resulting product reflects an addition reaction. In general, reactions take place to achieve its lowest Gibb’s free energy because it’s at
…show more content…
To stabilize the structure, the negative bromide was introduced via backside attack and made an anti product.
Melting range should be between 202°C to 204°C
Single Syn Addition Mechanism:
Bromide molecule from pyridinium tribromide was attacked by pi bond creating a positive charge on the bromide. To stabilize the structure, the negative bromide was introduced via frontside attack and made an syn product.
Melting range should be between 93.5°C to 95°C
Single Mechanism that leads to Mixture of both Syn and Anti Mechanism: Both frontside and backside attack occurs but the most predominant product is the one that is most stable. Most stable would be anti structure.
Melting range would be closely related to a mixed sample whose constituents are most identical. In other words, melting point will have a wide range and would be below 200°C and above 95°C.
CALCULATIONS
PERCENT YIELD
PERCENT
Many reactions that exist in nature involve a double displacement between ions and reactants with solvents. A bimolecular nucleophilic substitution, or SN2 reaction, involves a nucleophilic attack on a substrate and the departure of a leaving group. A nucleophile is a compound or ion that donates electrons to promote bond formation (Caldwell, 1984). In order for a leaving group in a compound to leave, it must possess the characteristics of a weak base and be able to occupy electrons. Several factors affect the rate and favorability of such reaction, such as (Bateman, 1940). In addition, the substrate that is attacked by the nucleophile is commonly an unhindered primary substrate to allow the reaction to occur quicker. An SN2 reaction follows the second-order rate law.
What essentially happens in these reactions is that first, light breaks the bond between two bromine atoms, from a
The beaker was slowly heated on a hot plate with low stirring until most of the stilbene was dissolved. 0.4 g of pyridinium tribromide was measured and added to the beaker after 5 minutes of heating. Small amounts of ethanol were used to clean the sides of the beaker. The beaker was heated for an additional 10 minutes on low temperature. An ice bath was prepared. The beaker was removed from the hot plate and left to cool to room temperature. Once at room temperature, the beaker was placed in the ice bath for 15 minutes. The solid product was collected through vacuum filtration and the product was weighed and a melting point was taken. Waste was disposed of in the correct waste bins and lab bench was cleaned
The nucleophilic substitution SN1/SN2 typically occur in a competitive regime. There are various conditions that define the predominant reaction mechanism taking place. Since SN1 leads to the racemic mixture, SN2 is more popular in asymmetric organic synthesis. So, detailed computational studies of model SN2 reactions have been carried out during the last three decades[2-6, 9].
The intermolecular forces in this molecular has hydrogen bonds because of the hydroxyl groups in there which makes the molecular form hydrogen bonds,=. Also the molecular is polar.
This analysis reveals that there are three π*→ π* interactions in unit 1 of both the molecules and two π*→ π* interactions in unit 2 with large stabilization energy. In unit 1 of p-IAd, the interactions such as π*(C1-C6) → π*(C2-C3), π*(C4-C5) → π*(C1-C6) and π*(C4-C5) → π*(C2-C3) arises with respective energy 1414.34, 2186.98 and 849.97 kJmol−1 . Likewise, the interactions π*(C1-C2) → π*(C5-C6), π*(C3-C4) → π*(C1-C2) and π*(C3-C4) → π*(C5-C6) in unit 1 of p-BAd attaining respective energy 1454.23, 2280.19 and 892.39 kJmol−1 The interaction π*→ π* with high stabilization energy 1306.13 kJmol−1 and 841.32 kJmol−1 is for the interaction π*(C15-C16) → π*(C19-C20), π*(C17-C18) → π*(C¬19-C20) occur within unit 2 of the p-IAd aromatic ring . Also,
In HDAC2 ETS1 and ETS2 adopted similar modes of binding (Figs 7a, 7c). Both were observed to have π-π stacking interactions with Phe-155 and Phe-210 in the core of the gorge. The imidazole ring of ETS1 and the oxazole ring of ETS2 was shown to be a parallel displaced π-π stacking interaction with Phe-155. ETS1 also has a parallel displaced π-π stacking interaction with Phe-210, while ETS2 was shown to adopt a face to face π-π stacking interaction with this residue instead. The indole rings of ETS1 and ETS2 participate in edge-to-edge stacking interactions with Phe-155 and His-33. In addition to bidentate metal-ion coordination the hydroxamate tail of both compounds like panobinostat, TOI1, and TOI2 participate in a hydrogen bond with
This synthesis is demonstrated by reaction 1.1 It is considerably endothermic (∆H0298K=1475.6 kJ) and the free energy associated to it, is presented in equation 1.1 To ensure the formation of the diboride over carbide, B2O3 is add in higher amount than stoichiometric quantity, so it will be in the product as an impurity as well as carbides and carbon.1
In this lab the melting point for the chemicals Urea and trans-cinnamic acid were observed in five different ratios: : pure urea, pure trans-cinnamic acid, 90% Urea and 10% trans-cinnamic acid, 50% Urea and 50% trans-cinnamic acid, and 10% Urea and 90% trans-cinnamic acid. By melting the substances,
As mentioned above, the initial addition (CHClBr+NO2→ CHClBrNO2 a) is barrierless and extremely exothermic. Considering the lower energy barriers for subsequent reactions, a, once formed, will isomerize or dissociate to the products. The energy information in the initial addition process is critically important for such case in the kinetic calculations. However, IRC calculation can not be conducted for the barrierless reaction. Since the electronic interaction between C in CHClBr and N in NO2 plays a significant role in this process, the energy profile of the association can be obtained by the relaxed scan, in which the C-N distance in a is fixed from r=2.2 to 3.6 Å in a step size of 1.0 Å and remaining geometries are optimized at B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level using tight convergence criteria. Subsequently, CASPT2 method is utilized to calculate the single point energies. Here, the energy of the reactants at r=10 Å are set to be zero for CASPT2 method. In order to account for the dynamic electron correlation, the CASPT2(16,11)/aug-cc-pVTZ energies are scaled by a factor of 1.18, corresponding to the ratio of the dissociation energies of a calculated at CCSD(T)/6-311++G(d,p) level (-45.17 kcal/mol) and the CASPT2(16,11)/aug-cc-pVTZ level (38.29 kcal/mol). Both of the results with ZPE correction are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 confirmed our assumption that a is formed barrierlessly via carbon-to-nitrogen approach. Based on the energy information
IR (KBr): νmax (cm-1): 2962 (Ar-H), 1664 (C=O), 1604 (C=C), 819 (C-Cl). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ ppm, 1.20 (d, 3H, CH3), 2.48-2.96 (m, 1H, CH), 7.74 (d, 1H, CH, J=17 Hz), 7.84 (d, 1H, CH, J=17 Hz), 7.12-8.17 (m, 8H, Ar-H). LCMS (m/z): 285.2 (M++1). C H N analysis: Calculated for C18H17ClO: C, 75.92; H, 6.02; Found: C, 75.90; H, 6.05%.
The ligand papered as reported in the literature(). Cumarin-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (1mol) was mixed with 50 ml hydrazine hydrate and the mixture was refluxed at
3r0To6cb8el)xTc029.80. 1c20(l7) 0.8 e0c(o4,sen1t 07(.0w)1T01e(js). T0 3T76(l) c( ie9.0T /0F z1/0F. 010T.f0 Ts0f.37T6Tc(Tz/F0.OT0700co0j)90,j.()30.)c8.s0Tc(02 67T T(Iw105 8T25T0c(ecT j3")0T 2c.3(1)4.Tw-0a. 72T0.c( exsa)7 T(fj) .Trespn)1si2hTB6230 T8r0 0 cT.0(l) T9.5090j3.i910.000cT 280 Td0. 0 Tw9 .0Tf0.61(Tc,)r 0 0 c(,ra]ilTBT3 Tr0. 0 Ts0.608062..68d;0r3Bhaj)0002e(\ d 8T 31 . 1. 5(n Tcxp iKl i'. T T0. ( e T4 80 0t153 0 2 .iEnlej iEe) Tj4. 20Tc(jioint)537oint)5(e)T6iTr9g3o3 in r 17 cw37 c(nieh.0 4b96 rg1Tj3.3300.Tese.)01(63.0T0.Te0607T 2 .2( ) j4d 2 w r 0 c Tcw0 3 (f Tsi fi ) j4 2 Tw0.583 T5.461 60Tw0.150.T)Ti0 d0 0 Tw9c( deTz/F0 Tc(T72T6.TfT50 s037 c( 86 w129.120 6(e) Tj3a)90,Tc() . a) Tj0. 0 05 .0Tj0.000TlTc() 0. 0 1038 0.480 Tc4(s))6Te4T83(T1.T)9T10)Tc(, 1 67 ) j el j469 w 6 c6 a ) 10 31 Tj hi\ nls) Tj5.708Tjkn b213)Tw0j.5103o(4)TcjT1fo40e. Td0. 0 Tw9r.0 0 870. g1Tl190 Tc0190.480 Tw0p( deTz/F0 10. 0 Tf0 Ts0.376 Tc(2867 Tw140. 0 Tec( ) Tj3.0 Tc(,) .0 9 a) Tj0. 0 xa42 i)j1iasohie) Tj4. 20 Tw0 .265 Tc87 0. 01o09(n) Tjst:iloi>0.
In recent years, many different catalytic systems including copper-free palladium-based catalysts have been applied for this reaction,14, 15 but the use of effective palladium-free systems would obviously be much more interesting in
The reaction stated before can be achieved with the help provided by the catalysts. The catalysts that can be used in this process are varied. The preferred catalysts are the metals that have electron configuration of d7 (although not required) [4]. These includes (1) Fe (Iron) = [Ar] 3d6 4s2, (2) Co (Cobalt) = [Ar] 3d7 4s2, (3) Ni (Nickel) = [Ar] 4s2 3d8, (4) Mo (Molybdenum) = [Kr] 4d5 5s1, (5) Ru (Ruthenium) = [Kr] 4d7 5s1. (6) Rh (Rhodium) = [Kr] 4d8 5s1, (7) W (Tungsten) = [Xe] 4f14 5d4 6s2, (8) Other platinum group noble metals. [5]