Different Leadership Styles

Consider what leadership or management style speaks most to you. Discuss that particular style, explain why it fits you better than others. Alternatively, consider the leadership or management style fits you least. Explain what is least desirable with that style from your perspective.

Leadership and management are commonly mistaken to be the same. Leaders and managers in an organization both lead, but the two are not synonymous. Management functions can provide leadership; and leadership activities can contribute to managing. Often leadership is also misunderstood to mean directing and instructing people and making important decisions on behalf of any organization. Effective leadership is much more than these. Good leadership requires attitudes and behaviors (Chapman, A., 2010). It requires human qualities beyond conventional notions of authority whereas management relies heavily on tangibles measurable capabilities such as effective planning. The followings are some differences between leader and manager. Manager administers, and leader innovates. Manager maintains and leader develops. Manager focuses on systems and structures, and leader focuses on people. Manager imitates and leader originates. Manager accepts the status quo and leader challenges it. Manager has his or her eye always on the bottom line and leader has his or her eye on the horizon.

Leadership and management are terms that are frequently used synonymously. While a good manager can be a leader, leadership and management are different. One of the earliest attempts at distinguishing the difference between leadership and management has been found in Phillip Selznick’s 1957 book Leadership in Administration (Joseph C Rost Leadership and Management p98 1998), in his book published in he wrote: “Leadership is not equivalent to office-holding or high prestige or authority or decision-making. It is not helpful to identify leadership with whatever is done by people in high places” (Rost, 1998 p98). Bennis (1992) clearly states what, he believes, distinguishes a leader from a manager, “Leaders conquer the context – the volatile, turbulent, ambiguous surroundings that sometimes seem to conspire against us and will surely suffocate us if we let them – while managers surrender to it. Bennis then lists twelve other differences:

Management and leadership are two notions that may be interchangeably, but there is a huge difference between a manager and a leader. They are two different ways of organizing people; the manager uses a formal method and the leader uses passion. "Managers do things right, and leaders do the right things." (Chapman, 2004, p.80)

Leadership and motivation styles vary from person to person, that is why it is essential for managers to know and understand their leadership style and how their particular leadership affects their workplace. Leadership is influenced by many things that is why it is so important to know how and why your leadership style is what it is. There are many contributors that come into play when a leadership style is developed within a person. During the course of the last eight weeks I have been taking a hard look at my own leadership style and what I can do to improve myself to better serve both my co-workers and subordinates. Upon being tasked to disburse the LPI forms to my managers, co-workers and subordinates I become somewhat distressed

Leadership and management although being seen as synonymous do differ, not every manager is a leader and vice versa.

Leadership and management are two different subjects but both are essential for an organizations growth. Leadership is “A relationship through which one person influences the behaviour or actions of other people” (Smith P et al 2012), whilst “Management is more about getting things done on a day-to-day basis and ensuring consistency” (Smith P et al 2012).In simple context Managers helps in doing the right thing where as Leaders do the right things. Having a strong Leader and Management an organization can reap the benefits of Competitive advantage as it would distinguish them to be an organization with core values, goals and scope which will eventually help them grow. It is understood that successful leaders do not habitually

A leader is someone who can influence others and who has a managerial authority. Leadership is what leaders do. More specifically, it’s the process of influencing a group to achieve goals.

There are various leadership styles that are employed in the process of ensuring that organizations perform at their best. One fact is that not a single leadership style qualifies to be used in all the organizations due to the diversity in the nature of organizations and what they deal in. each organization will adapt a given leadership style depending on the nature of the business they engage in as well as the leader they have.

As time goes on in the ever-changing world of business, bureaucratic practices are modernizing into “post-bureaucratic” strategies. Originally, the traditional bureaucratic practices used more of a standardized approach. Organizations were very centralized. Bureaucratic employees focused on the task at hand, while post-bureaucratic leaders had compassion and a vision for their work and employees. On that note, there are three classical theories of leadership that have developed with the changing time: trait theories, behavioral theories, and contingency theories. In this analysis, I will be describing the theories, as well as the advantages and disadvantages to each. It is also important to question how the post-bureaucratic leadership strategies have changed since the initial bureaucratic era. I have used work by Colbert, Judge, Choi, and Wang (2012) as well as House and Aditya (1997) to dig deeper into the demographic and psychological attributes of the trait theory. The research then transitions into the behavioral theory; I will support the three main behavioral leadership styles with the writings of Lewin, Lippitt, and White (1939); Bolden and Gosling (2006) also show examples of which countries practice the individual behavioral styles. Blake and Mouton (1964) play a role in describing the behavioral theory with a managerial grid demonstrating the growing concern for people and the production. Furthermore, Simpson, Clegg, and Pitsis (2014) introduce the benefits of a

There has been debate over what constitutes a leader so there is no wonder that the styles of leaders vary. Leaders must be able to motivate, mentor, coach and inspire others to reach organizational goals. Leadership style is the manner and approach of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people (Medina, 2011). All leaders of effective groups have four characteristics in common. First, they provide direction and meaning to the people they are leading and are responsible for keeping team members aware of important stated goals and objectives (Howard, 2005). Second, they generate trust by acting in an honest manner that creates an environment of trust (Howard, 2005). Third, they prefer action and risk taking and are

Definitively speaking, the phenomenon of leadership is based upon directing, influencing as well as motivating individuals for the purpose of implementing plans as well as running an organization. Leadership styles vary from person to person and is dependent upon the situations that the leader might be faced with (George, Sims, P. & Sims, D., 2007). Basically, the leadership styles have been categorized into six types (i.e. commanding, visionary, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting and coaching leadership styles). All these leadership styles indicate the different personalities of leaders who are visionary, yet influence people in a style that is identified by Paul Hersey, who proposes that leaders must constantly adjust their leading

Understanding the different styles of leadership is only the first step. Next, it has to be better understood how those leadership styles interact with and affect potential management positions. There are several types of management styles available for organizations to implement, and there is no specific right or wrong answer as to which one works best. Using different styles either individually or together can bring both positive and negative results to a group and organization. In fact, there really is no widely agreed, definitive list to use to approach the subject. However, the best list that could be found through extensive research lead to the five types listed below. These types are Affiliative, Participative, Commanding, Coaching,

Contrary to popular belief, the terms leadership and management are often thought of as hand in hand, but in retrospect they both have very strong different meanings and are not the same. There are some similar characteristics that can very much persuade some that they align in the same manner. They can be notably known as terms that are used interchangeably in the business world. “Management is a function that must be exercised in any business, whereas leadership is a relationship between leaders and led that can energize an organization” (Maccoby, 2000).

The articles under analysis explore leadership styles from the point of view of their relation to gender (Merchant, 2012) and personality (Yahaya et al., 2011). Merchant (2012) provides a valuable research, which is focused on gender as the major determinant of leadership styles in individuals. Providing an analysis of literature, Merchant (2012) indicates that “many studies analyzing the intersection of gender and influence tactics have resulted in mixed finding” (p. 24). It proves the argument that gender stereotypes play a major role in attributing particular roles for females and males on the basis of their biological sex and what is expected of them. Whereas Merchant (2012) does not present a particular argument