The widths of contact windows in certain CMOS circuit chips have a design specification of 3.5 μm (see Phadke et al., The Bell System Technical Journal, 1983, for details.) Postetch window widths of test specimens were as follows:3.21, 2.49, 2.94, 4.38, 4.02, 3.82, 3.30, 2.85, 3.34, 3.91Can we reject the hypothesis that the design specification is being met, at the 5% significance level? What assumptions are necessary for this test to be valid?l 10.27. The widths of contact windows in certainCMOS circuit chips have a design specificationof 3.5 um (see Phadke et al., The Bell SystemTechnical Journal, 1983, for details.) Postetchwindow widths of test specimens were asfollows:3.21, 2.49, 2.94, 4.38, 4.02,3.82, 3.30, 2.85, 3.34, 3.91Can we reject the hypothesis that thedesign specification is being met, at the 5%significance level? What assumptions arenecessary for this test to be valid?

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/30ede023-d472-4de3-b693-99cec29fc6dc.jpg

10.27. The widths of contact windows in certain CMOS circuit chips have a design specification of 3.5 um (see Phadke et al., The Bell System Technical Journal, 1983, for details.) Postetch window widths of test specimens were as follows: 3.21, 2.49, 2.94, 4.38, 4.02, 3.82, 3.30, 2.85, 3.34, 3.91 Can we reject the hypothesis that the design specification is being met, at the 5% significance level? What assumptions are necessary for this test to be valid?

10.27. The widths of contact windows in certain CMOS circuit chips have a design specification of 3.5 um (see Phadke et al., The Bell System Technical Journal, 1983, for details.) Postetch window widths of test specimens were as follows: 3.21, 2.49, 2.94, 4.38, 4.02, 3.82, 3.30, 2.85, 3.34, 3.91 Can we reject the hypothesis that the design specification is being met, at the 5% significance level? What assumptions are necessary for this test to be valid?

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter10: Statistics

Section10.3: Measures Of Spread

Problem 1GP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The number of contaminating particles on a silicon waferprior to a certain rinsing process was determined for eachwafer in a sample of size 100, resulting in the followingfrequencies:Number of particles 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Frequency 1 2 3 12 11 15 18 10Number of particles 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Frequency 12 4 5 3 1 2 1a. What proportion of the sampled wafers had at leastone particle? At least five particles?b. What proportion of the sampled wafers had betweenfive and ten particles, inclusive? Strictly between fiveand ten particles?c. Draw a histogram using relative frequency on thevertical axis. How would you describe the shape of thehistogram?
The table below summarizes data from a survey of a sample of women. Using a 0.01significance level, and assuming that the sample sizes of 800 men and 300 women are predetermined, test the claim that the proportions of agree/disagree responses are the same for subjects interviewed by men and the subjects interviewed by women. Does it appear that the gender of the interviewer affected the responses of women? Gender of Interviewer Man Woman Women who agree 498 247 Women who disagree 302 53 Compute the test statistic, rounding to three decimal places. Find the critical value(s). (Round to three decimal places) What is the conclusion based on the hypothesis test?
The article “Calibration of an FTIR Spectrometer” (P. Pankratz, Statistical Case Studies for Industrial and Process Improvement, SIAM-ASA, 1997: 19–38) describes the use of a spectrometer to make five measurements of the carbon content (in ppm) of a certain silicon wafer whose true carbon content was known to be 1.1447 ppm. The measurements were 1.0730, 1.0825, 1.0711, 1.0870, and 1.0979. a) Is it possible to estimate the uncertainty in these measurements? If so, estimate it. If not, explain why not. b) Is it possible to estimate the bias in these measurements? If so, estimate it. If not, explain why not.
Using all 1991 birth records in the computerized national birth certificate registry compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), statisticians Traci Clemons and Marcello Pagano found that the birth weights of babies in the United States are not symmetric ("Are babies normal?" The American Statistician, Nov 1999, 53:4). However, they also found that when infants born outside of the "typical" 37-43 weeks and infants born to mothers with a history of diabetes are excluded, the birth weights of the remaining infants do follow a Normal model with mean μ = 3432 g and standard deviation σ = 482 g. The following questions refer to infants born from 37 to 43 weeks whose mothers did not have a history of diabetes.
Using all 1991 birth records in the computerized national birth certificate registry compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), statisticians Traci Clemons and Marcello Pagano found that the birth weights of babies in the United States are not symmetric (\"Are babies normal?\" The American Statistician, Nov 1999, 53:4). However, they also found that when infants born outside of the \"typical\" 37-43 weeks and infants born to mothers with a history of diabetes are excluded, the birth weights of the remaining infants do follow a Normal model with mean μ = 3432 g and standard deviation σ = 482 g. The following questions refer to infants born from 37 to 43 weeks whose mothers did not have a history of diabetes. Compute the z-score of an infant who weighs 3762 g. (Round your answer to at least two decimal places.) Approximately what fraction of infants would you expect to have birth weights between 2890 g and 3410 g? (Express your answer as a decimal, not a percent, and…
Using all 1991 birth records in the computerized national birth certificate registry compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), statisticians Traci Clemons and Marcello Pagano found that the birth weights of babies in the United States are not symmetric ("Are babies normal?" The American Statistician, Nov 1999, 53:4). However, they also found that when infants born outside of the "typical" 37-43 weeks and infants born to mothers with a history of diabetes are excluded, the birth weights of the remaining infants do follow a Normal model with mean μ = 3402 g and standard deviation σ = 492 g. Let X be the weight of a randomly selected infant born from 37 to 43 weeks whose mother did not have a history of diabetes. What is the distribution of X? X ~ N (,) Please show the following answers to 4 decimal places. If a healthy infant is randomly chosen, find the probability that the birth weight is below 3156 g. If a healthy infant is randomly chosen, find the…
Using all 1991 birth records in the computerized national birth certificate registry compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), statisticians Traci Clemons and Marcello Pagano found that the birth weights of babies in the United States are not symmetric ("Are babies normal?" The American Statistician, Nov 1999, 53:4). However, they also found that when infants born outside of the "typical" 37-43 weeks and infants born to mothers with a history of diabetes are excluded, the birth weights of the remaining infants do follow a Normal model with mean μ = 3432 g and standard deviation σ = 482 g. The following questions refer to infants born from 37 to 43 weeks whose mothers did not have a history of diabetes.Compute the z-score of an infant who weighs 2903 g. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)−1.10Correct Approximately what fraction of infants would you expect to have birth weights between 3060 g and 4410 g? (Express your answer as a decimal, not a percent, and…
The British Department of Transportation studied to see if people avoid driving on Friday the 13th. They did a traffic count on a Friday and then again on a Friday the 13th at the same two locations. The data for each location on the two different dates is in the table. Do the data show that on average fewer people drive on Friday the 13th? Test at the 5% level.Traffic Count Dates 6th 13th 1990, July 137669 135825 1990, July 129699 128891 1991, September 136898 138275 1991, September 138966 139940 1991, December 132021 129640 1991, December 119268 119214 1992, March 131938 131104 1992, March 123306 124760 1992, November 129499 129219 1992, November 138568 135934
A simple random sample of heights of 6400Englishmen has a mean of 67.85 inches and SD 2.56 inches, while a simple random sample of heights of 1600 Australians has a mean of 68.55 inches and SD of 2.52 inches. D the data indicate that Australians are, on the average, taller than Englishmen?