Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 20CP
Summary Introduction
To determine: Whether person P recover half of the proceeds from person A.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Brandt Crossing Investments, Inc., was a family-owned property investment organization, investing in undeveloped properties when prices were low and then selling them when prices went up. Among its holdings, Brandt Crossing owned fifty acres of undeveloped land next to another fifty acres of undeveloped land owned by Khloe Hadid.
Carter Rios, property manager for Brandt Crossing, approached Hadid and offered to purchase her fifty acres “for Brandt.” Hadid sold the property for $50,000. Within one year, Brandt Crossing sold its 100 acres, including the property bought from Hadid, to a developer for $1,000,000. Richard Brandt, a 5% owner of Brandt Crossing Investments and an old high school acquaintance of Hadid, saw her at the mall and told her of the recent sale. Furious that she had lost out on the income and convinced that Rios had misled her, Hadid sued Richard Brandt for the acts of his agent, Rios. Hadid argued that the facts were sufficient to create an agency by estoppel…
In 2010, X and B agreed that they will pretend that they will enter into a contract of sale so that X will have a lesser tax to pay. In the contract of sale, it was indicated that X will sell the car for P50Million to which B agreed. What is this kind of contract?
A. Absolute simulation
B. Relative simulation
C. Factual simulation
D. Fictional simulation
A man named Bob Smith believes that he is Santa Claus (who delivers presents to all the children around the world on Christmas Eve). In fact, he is not Santa, but he has believed this for many years. He signs his name "Santa." He signs many contracts as "Santa," and he refers to his wife as "Mrs. Claus" even though her name is actually Betty Smith. She puts up with it, because he really does believe he is Santa, and because she loves him and because his wages from his job at Hasbro toys pays the bills.
One day he enters a contract with your company to hire you to build him a gigantic workshop in his backyard so he can build his toys and stable his "eight tiny reindeer." In return he will pay you $120,000 for the construction. When his wife learns of this deal, she tries to reject it because it is voidable due to his lack of contractual capacity.
Was this contract voidable, or valid and enforceable? Answer the questions.
Chapter 12 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 12 - Prob. 1COCh. 12 - Prob. 2COCh. 12 - Prob. 3COCh. 12 - Prob. 4COCh. 12 - Prob. 5COCh. 12 - Prob. 1QCh. 12 - Prob. 2QCh. 12 - Prob. 3QCh. 12 - Prob. 4QCh. 12 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 12 - Prob. 6QCh. 12 - Prob. 7QCh. 12 - Prob. 8QCh. 12 - Prob. 9QCh. 12 - Prob. 10QCh. 12 - Prob. 11QCh. 12 - Prob. 12CPCh. 12 - Prob. 13CPCh. 12 - Prob. 14CPCh. 12 - Prob. 15CPCh. 12 - Prob. 16CPCh. 12 - Prob. 17CPCh. 12 - Prob. 18CPCh. 12 - Prob. 19CPCh. 12 - Prob. 20CPCh. 12 - Prob. 1TSCh. 12 - Prob. 2TSCh. 12 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A man named Bob Smith believes that he is Santa Claus (who delivers presents to all the children around the world on Christmas Eve). In fact, he is not Santa, but he has believed this for many years. He signs his name "Santa." He signs many contracts as "Santa," and he refers to his wife as "Mrs. Claus" even though her name is actually Betty Smith. She puts up with it, because he really does believe he is Santa, and because she loves him and because his wages from his job at Hasbro toys pays the bills. One day he enters a contract with your company to hire you to build him a gigantic workshop in his backyard so he can build his toys and stable his "eight tiny reindeer." In return he will pay you $120,000 for the construction. When his wife learns of this deal, she tries to reject it because it is voidable due to his lack of contractual capacity. Was this contract voidable, or valid and enforceable? explain the answer.arrow_forwardMelani sold a silver-looking laptop case to Bente for $2,500. Both honestly believed that the case was made of 95% platinum and 5% ruthenium. Jossie later learned that the briefcase was made of 100% inexpensive sterling silver with gold plating on the handles and corners. Explain whether Jossie can rescind the contract with Melani.arrow_forwardJane is fifteen years old. She visited a Grocery (Rip-off) and requested food items, which cost about $100. Jane’s parents are out of town and she is very short on food supplies and as such Rip-off gave to her the much needed groceries. However, when her parents returned home a few days later, they refused to pay for the groceries. They quickly pointed out that Jane is a minor and she does not have any contractual capacity.arrow_forward
- Dylan negotiates with a buyer for a Seven Eleven store to sell a one-year supply of syrups for use in its Slurpee machine, with a big discount if the buyer will take and pay for the entire quantity in the first month, assuring the buyer that the syrups have an 18-month shelf life before they would become unusable. It turns out that they have a 6-month shelf life and then go bad. The buyer should prevail on a damages claim for misrepresentation. True OR Falsearrow_forwardSalim is the owner of many buildings and hotels. Since he is a minor, his mother was his legally appointed guardian. Salimconvinced Omar to give him loan of 20,000 OMR with 12% interest. The loan was taken by mortgaging one of his properties. Omar gave 10,000 OMR as advance and Salim promised that he will return the money after one year. Salim’s mother informed Omar that anybody who would get into an agreement with him would do so at his own risk. After knowing this, Omar wants to get the advance he has given. Questions a.Is Salim bound to give the money back to Omar? Why or why not? b.Is this a valid contract? Explain why or why not?arrow_forwardBryan is a purchaser for Ace Widgets. Bryan’s brother-in-law is a salesperson for Niche Electronics, one of Ace’s largest suppliers. Bryan told his supervisor about the relationship, and she approved his ordering of supplies from his brother-in-law as long as the purchases were reviewed by a senior manager. Bryan did not receive any favor or money from his brother-in- law in return for the sales. A year after Bryan discussed the situation with his supervisor, Ace’s management discovers that another supplier offers the same parts as Niche Electronics but at cheaper prices. Ace Widgets is considering suing Bryan for conflict of interest. Which of the following is the most accurate statement about Ace’s chances of success? Choices: A. Ace’s chances are good because it could have gotten the supplies at a lower price. B. Ace’s chances are poor because Bryan did not actually receive any money from his brother-in-law for sending him business. C. Ace’s chances are poor because the company was…arrow_forward
- At least six months before the Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, a group made up of Stafford Fontenot, Steve Turner, Mike Montelaro, Joe Sokol, and Doug Brinsmade agreed to sell Cajun food at the games and began making preparations. On May 19, the group (calling themselves Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana) applied for a business license with the county health department. Ted Norris sold members of the group a mobile kitchen in return for an $8,000 check drawn on the “Prairie Cajun Sea-food Catering of Louisiana” account and two promissory notes, one for $12,000 and the other for $20,000. The notes, which were dated June 12, listed only Fontenot “d/b/a Prairie Cajun Seafood” as the maker (d/b/a is an abbreviation for “doing business as”). On July 31, Fontenot and his friends signed a partnership agreement, which listed specific percentages of profits and losses. They drove the mobile kitchen to Atlanta, but business was disastrous. When the notes were not paid, Norris…arrow_forwardAt least six months before the Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, a group made up of Stafford Fontenot, Steve Turner, Mike Montelaro, Joe Sokol, and Doug Brinsmade agreed to sell Cajun food at the games and began making preparations. On May 19, the group (calling themselves Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana) applied for a business license with the county health department. Ted Norris sold members of the group a mobile kitchen in return for an $8,000 check drawn on the “Prairie Cajun Sea-food Catering of Louisiana” account and two promissory notes, one for $12,000 and the other for $20,000. The notes, which were dated June 12, listed only Fontenot “d/b/a Prairie Cajun Seafood” as the maker (d/b/a is an abbreviation for “doing business as”). On July 31, Fontenot and his friends signed a partnership agreement, which listed specific percentages of profits and losses. They drove the mobile kitchen to Atlanta, but business was disastrous. When the notes were not paid, Norris…arrow_forwardBob offered to sell Teresa his used motorcycle. She took a look at it and asked Bob how it ran, to which Bob replied that it was in good shape. Teresa thought the motorcycle was two years old when she purchased it. A few days later, she discovered that it was actually five years old. She asks Bob to take back the motorcycle. He tells her no way, that he thought she knew the age of that model, and that she should have asked him if she had any uncertainty. If Teresa sues, who is likely to win and why?arrow_forward
- Mr. Henok claims he has been unfairly dismissed by his employers. He consults a law firm owned by Mrs. Justice, who agrees to take up Henok’s case. The law consulting firm, owned by Ms Justice advises him that if Henok wins his case he can expect a compensation of 30,000 birr but if he loses he will receive nothing. The law consultant firm estimates her fee to be 5,000 birr. As an alternative the consultant offer him a ‘no win, no fee’ deal under which he pays no fee but if he wins his case, the consulting firm will take half of the compensation he receives. Henok also asked to pay his employer’s cost which is 1000 birr in both deals. He can decide against bringing the case, which will incur no cost and result in no compensation. Based on the information given above: a. Develop a payoff table to Henok’s case b. Advise Henok what to do: i. Using the maximax decision ruleii. Using the maximin decision rule.iii. Using the Minmax regret decision rulearrow_forwardJim offered to buy James’s Porsche motor vehicle. Jim gave James 2 weeks for an answer. Two days after, Jane offered to sell her Porsche motor vehicle to Jim for which he was very excited to purchase because she had the latest model. Jim called James and told him personally that he is no longer interested in purchasing his Porsche. James is very upset, because he was keen to sell. He is of the view that Jim cannot withdraw his offer because the two weeks has not elapsed. He knows that you are a business law student at Open Campus and sought your advice on the matter. Advise James.Will your answer be the same, if Jim failed to communicate to James within the two weeks that he no longer is interested in purchasing James’s Porsche motor vehicle and James accepted on the last day of the end of the two weeks?arrow_forward1. Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale of 100 acres of land. They orally agree on a price of $100,000, one half in cash at closing and the other half 90 days after closing. Buyer sends Seller a letter in which all the terms are included and is signed by Buyer. Seller never responds. When the closing date arrives, Seller refuses to transfer title. Buyer sues. Is the agreement enforceable at law? 2. Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale of 100 acres of land. They orally agree on a price of $100,000, with payment to be made within 10 days and the deed delivered within another 30 days. Buyer sends Seller a letter in which all these terms are included, along with a check for $100,000 that Seller deposits. Seller fails to deliver a deed, and Buyer seeks to enforce the contract. Is the contract enforceable? 3. John is president and sole shareholder of Photo, Inc. Photo, Inc. wishes to borrow money, but to do so, the bank requires John to orally guarantee to repay the loan if…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON