Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 9Q
Summary Introduction
To discuss: Whether person N’s new promise binding.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Anita bought a television set from Bertrum for her personal use. Bertrum, who was out of security agreement forms, showed Anita a form he had executed with Nathan, another consumer. Anita and Bertrum orally agreed to the terms of the form. Anita subsequently defaulted on payment, and Bertrum sought to repossess the television. a. Explain who would prevail. b. Explain whether the result would differ if Bertrum had filed a financing statement. c. Explain whether the result would differ if Anita had subsequently sent Bertrum an e-mail that met all the requirements of an effective security agreement.
Oliver, while he was so drunk that he didn’t know what he was doing, bid successfully at an auction for the purchase of a house. It was clear to the auctioneer that Oliver didn’t know what he was doing. However, after Oliver sobered up, he confirmed the contract with the auctioneer. He then subsequently refused to complete the contract. Is Oliver bound to the contract? Required: Answer this question using the IRAC * method.
Wong engages Chen as his agent to sell his house. Wong's brother tells Chen that Wong will sell the house for $500.000. A purchaser offers to buy the house for $510.000. Chen tells the purchaser, I can accept that offer on behalf of my client The purchaser obtains a bank loan to buy the house. When Wong finds out what Chen has done he is furious and refuses to accept the proposed sale agreement. Which of the following statements is true:
(A) Wong is bound to sell the house to the purchaser for $510,000.
(B) Wong is not bound by Chen's acceptance' because he did not authorize Chen to make any sale agreement on his behalf.
(C) Wong's brother authorized Chen to accept the offer and therefore Wong is bound to sell the house to the purchaser for $510,000.
(D) Chen is entitled to apply to the court for an order of specific performance compelling Wong to complete the contract
Chapter 12 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 12 - Prob. 1COCh. 12 - Prob. 2COCh. 12 - Prob. 3COCh. 12 - Prob. 4COCh. 12 - Prob. 5COCh. 12 - Prob. 1QCh. 12 - Prob. 2QCh. 12 - Prob. 3QCh. 12 - Prob. 4QCh. 12 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 12 - Prob. 6QCh. 12 - Prob. 7QCh. 12 - Prob. 8QCh. 12 - Prob. 9QCh. 12 - Prob. 10QCh. 12 - Prob. 11QCh. 12 - Prob. 12CPCh. 12 - Prob. 13CPCh. 12 - Prob. 14CPCh. 12 - Prob. 15CPCh. 12 - Prob. 16CPCh. 12 - Prob. 17CPCh. 12 - Prob. 18CPCh. 12 - Prob. 19CPCh. 12 - Prob. 20CPCh. 12 - Prob. 1TSCh. 12 - Prob. 2TSCh. 12 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Discuss the impact of statute on a person's failure to pay his instalments, or honour his instalments obligations when they were duearrow_forward1. Roy asked Mark if he can use his phone for a week. If Roy agreed and allowed Mark to use his phone, what contract is created? Explain 2. Lance borrowed money from Renz. There was no stipulation to pay interest. Has Renz the right to demand interest? Explainarrow_forwardAnticipatory Repudiation. Moore contracted inwriting to sell her 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe to Hammer for$18,500. Moore agreed to deliver the car on Wednesday, andHammer promised to pay the $18,500 on the following Friday. On Tuesday, Hammer informed Moore that he wouldnot be buying the car after all. By Friday, Hammer hadchanged his mind again and tendered $18,500 to Moore.Moore, although she had not sold the car to another party,refused the tender and refused to deliver. Hammer claimedthat Moore had breached their contract. Moore contendedthat Hammer’s repudiation released her from her duty toperform under the contract. Who is correct, and why? (SeePerformance and Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts.)arrow_forward
- Sheila owned an old roadside building that she believed could be easily converted into an antique shop. She talked to her friend Barbara, an antique fancier, and they executed the following written agreement: a. Sheila would supply the building, all utilities, and $100,000 capital for purchasing antiques. b. Barbara would supply $30,000 for purchasing antiques, Sheila would repay her when the business terminated. c. Barbara would manage the shop, make all purchases, and receive a salary of $500 per week plus 5 percent of the gross receipts. d. Fifty percent of the net profits would go into the purchase of new stock. The balance of the net profits would go to Sheila. e. The business would operate under the name “Roadside Antiques.” Business went poorly, and after one year, a debt of $40,000 is owed to Old Fashioned, Inc., the principal supplier of antiques purchased by Barbara in the name of Roadside Antiques. Old Fashioned sues Roadside Antiques, and Sheila and Barbara as partners.…arrow_forwardAaron bought a television set for personal use from Penny. Aaron properly signed a security agreement and paid Penny $125 down, as their agreement required. Penny did not file, and subsequently Aaron sold the television for $800 to Clark, his neighbor, for use in Clark’s hotel lobby. a. When Aaron fails to make the January and February payments, may Penny repossess the television from Clark? b. What if, instead of Aaron’s selling the television set to Clark, a judgment creditor levied (sought possession) on the television? Who would prevail? c. What if Clark intended to use the television set in his home? Who would prevail?arrow_forwardMatthew and Joe were roommates. When they were renting their apartment, each agreed to pay half of the cost of the rent and the cable and electric bills. Two months after moving in, Matthew borrowed Joe's car and was involved in an accident. Matthew promised to pay $2,200 in damages if Joe promised not to file a claim with his insurance company. Joe agreed. However, Matthew never paid him for the damages. He claimed that the agreement was not enforceable because there was no consideration. What is the outcome? Rubricarrow_forward
- The following are exceptions to the general rule that only persons who sign the negotiable instrument are liable thereon, except: a. Agent who fails to disclose his principal b. Written promise to accept a bill before it is drawn c. Acceptance of a bill on a separate paper d. Persons signing under a trade namearrow_forwardIs there any exception to the rule that a mistake of law cannot vitiate consent rendering the contract voidable? Explain.arrow_forwardSam Simpleton, a resident of Kansas, and Nellie Naive, a resident of Missouri, each bought $85,000 in stock at local offices in their home States from Evil Stockbrokers, Inc. (“Evil”), a business incorporated in Delaware, with its principal place of business in Kansas. Both Simpleton and Naive believe that they were cheated by Evil Stockbrokers and would like to sue Evil for fraud. Assuming that no Federal question is at issue, assess the accuracy of the following statements: a. Simpleton can sue Evil in a Kansas State trial court. b. Simpleton can sue Evil in a Federal district court in Kansas. c. Naive can sue Evil in a Missouri State trial court. d. Naive can sue Evil in a Federal district court in Missouri.arrow_forward
- Green was the owner of a large department store. On Wednesday, January 26, he talked to Smith and said, “I will hire you as sales manager in my store for one year at a salary of $48,000; you are to begin work next Monday.” Smith accepted and started work on Monday, January 31. At the end of three months, Green discharged Smith. On May 15, Smith brings an action against Green to recover the unpaid portion of the $28,000 salary. Is Smith’s employment contract enforceable? Explain.arrow_forwardUnder the frustration of purpose doctrine, performance is excused when: Group of answer choices 1. something that is essential to the promisor's performance is destroyed through no fault of the promisor, but its substitute is available. 2. statutes and legislation make the performance more difficult. 3. the promisor impliedly assumes the risk that the event would occur. 4. events occur after the formation of the contract that would make the return performance of the other party worthless to the promisor.arrow_forwardJoanna entered into a loan contract with Marie over Marie’s car where Joanna is the borrower and Marie is the lender. It was stated in the contract that the ownership will be transferred to Joanna. The title to the car was given to Joanna who registered the car in her name. Before the end date of the contract, Joanna expressed her intention to buy the car. But Marie refused to agree to Joanna’s intent. Was Marie correct in refusing to agree to Joanna’s intent? Why or why not?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON