EBK MICROECONOMICS
2nd Edition
ISBN: 8220103679701
Author: List
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 11Q
To determine
Meaning of first mover advantage and the importance of commitment in games with first mover advantage.
(a)
To determine
Existence of first mover advantage in a game of rock, paper, scissors.
(b)
To determine
Existence of first mover advantage in a market-entrance situation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Rock-paper-scissors is a game in which players typically use mixed strategies. Can you think of other examples? What are some of the characteristics of games that usually involve playing mixed strategies?
The order of play tends to matter in sequential games where rivals must predict best reply-responses and counter-responses in order to achieve a desired payoff. Discuss an instance in which you or your firm used game theory and explain why the relationship between the players was a strategic one. Did the use of a credible threat or commitment affect the outcome? Were there any first-mover of fast-second strategies used?
Consider the following game in normal form.
Not cooperate
Cooperate
Not cooperate
20,20
50,0
Cooperate
0,50
40,40
What is Nash equilibrium? Is it efficient? Why?
What needs to be complied with so that the players would like to cooperate? What happens when one of the players does not cooperate? Why? Define trigger strategy.
Calculate the discount factor (δ) that would make both players decide to cooperate.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In Promaine Flats, Nevada there were two restaurants: Sal Monella and Road Kill Café. Current profit is $7,000 each. Cleaning will attract more customers, but profit will reduce to $5,000 each. However, if one cleans up and other doesn’t then profit will be $12,000 and $3,000. A. Complete Payoff Matrix(picture) B. What is each players dominant strategy.(explain) C. What is the outcome of the game.(explain)arrow_forwardSuppose this is a one-shot game played by City Potato Farm and Country Potato Farm. What is the cooperative outcome of this game? Is it a good prediction of this game? options, pick one: Both City Potato Farm and Country Potato Farm produce 7,000 potatoes; Yes Both City Potato Farm and Country Potato Farm produce 5,000 potatoes; Yes Both City Potato Farm and Country Potato Farm produce 5,000 potatoes; No City Potato Farm produces 7,000 potatoes and Country Potato Farm produces 5,000 potatoes; No Both City Potato Farm and Country Potato Farm produce 7,000 potatoes; Noarrow_forwardUse the following normal-form game to answer the following question. Player 2 Player 1 Strategy C D A 30,30 70,0 B 0,70 60,60 Identify the one-shot equilibrium Suppose the players know this game will be repeated three times. Can they achieve payoffs that are better than the one-shot game Nash Equilibrium? Explain. Suppose the game is infinitely repeated and the interest rate is 6%. Can the player achieve payoffs that are better than the one-shot game equilibrium? Explain.arrow_forward
- Hi this is from a textbook. Thank you. Consider the following game in which Sally can play T or B and John chooses between L or R. Each player makes their choice simultaneously. If Sally chooses T and John chooses L, Sally gets a payoff of 5 and John has a payoff of 4. If Sally plays T and John R, Sally’s payoff is 8 and John gets 3. If Sally Chooses B and John L, the payoffs are 3 to Sally and 2 to John. Finally, if Sally chooses B and John R, the payoffs are 7 to Sally and 0 to John. Which statement is true? a) The Nash equilibrium is (B,R); this is a prisoners’ dilemma b) The Nash equilibrium is (T,R); this is a prisoners’ dilemma c) The Nash equilibrium is (T,R); this is not dominant strategy equilibrium d) The Nash equilibrium is (T,L); this is a dominant strategy equilibrium e) None of the abovearrow_forwardHow do we solve a Sequential-move game?arrow_forwardConsider the following payoff matrix that is below : A. Does Player A have a dominant startegy? Explain why or why not b. Does player B have a dominant strategy? Explain why or why not. Player B Strategy 1 2 Player A Strategy 1 $2,000 \ $1,000 -$1,000 \ -$2,000 2 -$2,000 \ -$1,000 $1,000 \ $2,000arrow_forward
- 1. A game may have more than one Nash equilibrium. T/F ? 2. A game has always at least one pure strategy Nash equilibrium. T/F? 3. A situation where everyone is playing a dominant strategy must be a Nash equilibrium. T/F?arrow_forward. In a gambling game, Player A and Player B both have a $1 and a $5 bill. Each player selects one of the bills without the other player knowing the bill selected. Simultaneously they both reveal the bills selected. If the bills do not match, Player A wins Player B's bill. If the bills match, Player B wins Player A's bill. a. Develop the game theory table for this game. The values should be expressed as the gains (or losses) for Player A. b. Is there a pure strategy? Why or why not? c. Determine the optimal strategies and the value of this game. Does the game favor one player over the other? d. Suppose Player B decides to deviate from the optimal strategy and begins playing each bill 50% of the time. What should Player A do to improve Player A’s winnings? Comment on why it is important to follow an optimal game theory strategy.arrow_forwardIn two players dynamic games the player who moves second gets the advantage because we solve the game backwards. Explain why or why not?arrow_forward
- Consider the following game: Mercedes-Benz and Honda are the only two firms in the market for automobiles. Each firm has two strategies: produce high-grade vehicles or produce low-grade vehicles. The first entry in the bracket is the payoffs (in $billion) of Mercedes-Benz and the second entry is the payoffs of Honda. (see the image) What is the dominant strategy of Mercedes-Benz and Honda? Also, what is the Nash equilibrium of this game?arrow_forwardJohn and Paul are walking in the woods one day when suddenly an angry bear emerges from the underbrush. They each can do one of two things: run away or stand and fight. If one of them runs away and the other fights, then the one who ran will get away unharmed (payoff of 0) while the one who fights will be killed (payoff -200). If they both run, then the bear will chase down one of them and eat them to death but the other one will get away unharmed. Assuming they don't know which one will escape we will call this a payoff of -100 for both. If they BOTH fight, then they will successfully drive off the bear but they may be injured in the process (payoff -20). Construct a payoff matrix for this game and identify the pure strategy Nash equilibrium. (Indicate it with words not with a circle!)arrow_forwardWhat is the Nash Equilibrium in a game? A. A situation where all players cooperate for maximum gain B. A situation where no player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy unilaterally C. A situation where players always choose the same strategy D. A situation where players randomly select strategiesarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning