Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134184890
Author: PINDYCK
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 9E
To determine
Application of the first mover advantage.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider the following game of ’divide the dollar.’ There is a dollar to be split between two players. Player 1 can make any offer to player 2 in increments of 25 cents; that is, player 1 can make offers of 0 cents, 25 cents, 50 cents, 75 cents, and $1. An offer is the amount of the original dollar that player 1 would like player 2 to have. After player 2 gets an offer, she has the option of either accepting or rejecting the offer. If she accepts, she gets the offered amount and player 1 keeps the remainder. If she rejects, neither player gets anything.
Draw the game tree of the modified version of the ’divide the dollar’ game in which player 2 can make a counteroffer if she does not accept player 1’s offer. After player 2 makes her counteroffer - if she does - player 1 can accept or reject the counteroffer. As before, if there is no agreement after the two rounds of offers, neither player gets anything. If there is an agreement in either round then each player gets the amount agreed…
Player 1 and Player 2 are trying to agree on how to split a pie of size 1 in a two-stage bargaining game. If no agreement is reached after the two stages are complete, the pie is split for them according to a pre-arranged agreement that gives Player 1 and Player 2 one-quarter and three quarters of the pie, respectively. In the first stage, Player 1 makes an offer (x1, x2), where x1 + x2 = 1. Player 2 can either accept this offer (at which point the game ends and the pie is split according to Player 1’s offer), or can make a counter-offer. When Player 2 makes a counter offer, Player 1 can either accept (in which case the pie is split according to Player 2’s offer) or can reject, in which case the pie is split according to the pre-arranged agreement. Both players have a discount factor d – getting dx in the first stage (after Player 1’s proposal) is as good as getting x in the second stage (after Player 2’s proposal).
a) In the last stage of the game, Player 1 will accept any offer…
In a two-player, one-shot, simultaneous-move game, each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $400. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $200. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $100 and player 2 earns $600. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $600 and player 2 earns $100. a. Write this game in normal form. b. Find each player’s dominant strategy, if it exists. c. Find the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game. d. Rank strategy pairs by aggregate payoff (highest to lowest). e. Can the outcome with the highest aggregate payoff be sustained in equilibrium? Why or why not?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that two firms, firm A and firm B, are competing in the market. Assume that each firm has two strategies available: “no promotion” and “extensive promotion”. If both firms choose “no promotion”, each firm will get a payoff of 8000. If both firms choose “extensive promotion”, each firm will get a payoff of 5000. If one firm chooses “no promotion” and the other firm chooses “extensive promotion”, the firm that chooses “no promotion” will get a payoff of 4000 and the firm that chooses “extensive promotion” will get a payoff of 10000.a. Assume the game is a 2-players one-shot simultaneous game, please develop the normal form of this game by showing the players, the strategies and the payoffs. b. Follow part (a), determine the dominant strategy of firm A. c. Follow part (a), determine the dominant strategy of firm B. d. Follow part (a), determine the equilibrium of this game. e. If the game becomes an infinitely repeated game, what do you expect to happen?arrow_forwardtwo players, a and b are playing an asymmetrical game. there are n points on the game board. each turn player a targets a pair of points and player b says whether those two points are connected or unconnected. a can target each pair only once and the game ends when all pairs have been targeted. player b wins if a point is connected with all other points on the very last turn, while player a wins if any point is connected with all other points on any turn but the very last one or if no point is connected to all other points after the last turn. for what values of n does either player have a winning strategy?arrow_forwardIn a two-player, one-shot simultaneous-move game each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $500. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $100. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $0 and player 2 earns $650. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $650 and player 2 earns $0.a) Write the above game in normal form.b) Find each player’s dominant strategy, if it exists.c) Find the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game.d) Rank strategy pairs by aggregate payoff (highest to lowest).e) Can the outcome with the highest aggregate payoff be sustained in equilibrium? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Consider the following bargaining game with three rounds: Players 1 and 2 divide a pie of size 1. Both players have a common discount factor, δ = 0.9. In the first round (player 1 proposes): player 1 proposes x ∈ [0, 1]. If player 2 accepts the offer, then player 1 gets x, and player 2 gets 1−x. If player 2 rejects the offer, the game proceeds to round 2. In the second round (player 2 proposes): player 2 proposes y ∈ [0, 1]. If player 1 accepts the offer, then player 1 gets δy, and player 2 gets δ − δy. If player 2 rejects the offer, the game proceeds to round 3, the final round. In the third and final round (player 1 proposes): player 1 proposes z ∈ [0, 1]. If player 2 accepts the offer, player 1 gets δ2z, and player 2 gets δ2 − δ2z. If player 2 rejects the offer, everyone gets 0. 1. What would be the SPNE of the game?arrow_forwardRosencrantz and Guildenstern play a game in which they simultaneously put down some number of coins with either a head or a tail showing on each coin. Rosencrantz puts down one coin and Guildenstern puts down two coins. Rosencrantz pays Guildenstern one dollar for each coin that shows the side that Rosencrantz played; for example, if Rosencrantz played a head and Guildenstern played a head and a tail, Rosencrantz would pay Guildenstern two dollars, since two heads were displayed among the three coins. a. Formulate a strategic game that represents this situation. b. Find all Nash equilibria of this game (including any mixed strategy equilibria). c. For each of the Nash equilibria in (b), give Guildenstern’s expected payoff.arrow_forwardConsider the following sequential strategic situation, called the centipede game. The game has 100 stages. Two players take turns making decisions, starting with player 1. At stage t = 1,...,99, player 1 (if the stage is odd) or player 2 (if the stage if even) chooses whether to "Terminate the game" or to "Continue the game." If the game is terminated instage t = 1,...,99, the player terminating the game receives a payoff of t, while the other player receives a payoff of zero. Finally, at stage t = 100, player 2 chooses between action A with a payoff of 99 for each player, or action B with a payoff of zero for player 1 and a payoff of 100 for player 2. Draw the game tree for this situation. What is the SPNE?arrow_forward
- Consider the following bargaining game with four rounds: Players 1 and 2 divide a pie of size 1. Both players have a common discount factor, δ = 0.8. In the first round (player 1 proposes): player 1 proposes x ∈ [0, 1]. If player 2 accepts the offer, then player 1 gets x, and player 2 gets 1−x. If player 2 rejects the offer, the game proceeds to round 2. In the second round (player 2 proposes): player 2 proposes y ∈ [0, 1]. If player 1 accepts the offer, then player 1 gets δy, and player 2 gets δ − δy. If player 2 rejects the offer, the game proceeds to round 3. In the third round (player 1 proposes): player 1 proposes z ∈ [0, 1]. If player 2 accepts the offer, player 1 gets δ2z, and player 2 gets δ2 − δ2z. If player 2 rejects the offer, the game proceeds to round 4. In the fourth and final round (player 2 proposes): player 2 proposes u ∈ [0, 1]. If player 1 accepts the offer, player 1 gets δ3u, and player 2 gets δ3 −δ3u. If player 1 rejects the offer, everyone gets 0. 1. What would be…arrow_forwardConsider the following two person game. Player 1 begins the game by choosing A or B. If Player 1 chooses A the game ends and Player 1 receives $100 and Player 2 receives $100. If Player 1 chooses B then Player 2 must choose C or D. If Player 2 chooses C then Player 1 receives $150 and Player 2 receives $250. If Player 2 chooses D then Player 1 receives $0 and Player 2 receives $400. Draw the complete game tree for this situation. Be sure to accurately label the tree and include the payoffs. Using backwards induction (look forward and reason backwards) determine the rational outcome to this game. Given how experimental subjects have behaved in the Ultimatum game, provide a behavioral explanation for why an “average” Player 1 and 2 might deviate from the rational prediction.arrow_forwardTwo individuals each receive fifty dollars to play the following game. Independently of each other, they decide how much money to put in a common pot. They keep the rest for themselves. As for the money in the pot, it is increased by 80% and then distributed equally among the two individuals. For instance, suppose that the first individual puts $10 in the pot while the second individual puts $20. Increasing the total pot of $30 by 80% gives $54 to share equally between the two individuals. So the first individual’s payoff in this case is $(40 + 27) = $67, while the second individual’s payoff is $(30 + 27) = $57. (a) Compute the Nash equilibrium. (b) Is the Nash equilibrium Pareto efficient? Explainarrow_forward
- A payoff matrix is shown below. With the payoffs in each field indicated in the form (Player 1’s payoff, Player 2’s payoff). Player 2 Left Right Player 1 Up ($1, $1) ($2, $4) Down ($7, $8) ($3, $3) Which of the following is true? The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Up’ and Player 2 playing ‘Right’. The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Down’ and Player 2 playing ‘Left’. The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Down’ and Player 2 playing ‘Right’. None of the other answers provided are true.arrow_forwardDad baked a chocolate cake for his twins Jack and Mary on their birthday, and he wants Jack and Mary to divide it without any screaming and mess. Mom devises the following procedure: First, Jack (who was born first) proposes a division of the cake that Mary can accept or reject. If the first offer is accepted by Mary, then the game is over and Mary and Jack get the split of cake offered by Jack. If the offer is rejected by Mary, then Mom gets to eat half of the cake, and next Mary offers a division of the remaining cake to Jack that he can either accept or reject. If the second offer is accepted by Jack, then the game is over and Mary and Jack get the split of the remaining cake offered by Mary. If the kids do not reach an agreement in the second round (Jack rejects Mary's offer). Mom gets to eat the rest of the cake by herself. The cake has two equal parts: one with cherries and one with coconut. If Jack gets fraction x in [0, 1] of the cherry part and y in [0, 1] of the coconut part,…arrow_forwardConsider the following game. There are two payers, Player 1 and Player 2. Player 1 chooses a row (10, 20, or 30), and Player 2 chooses a column (10/20/30). Payoffs are in the cells of the table, with those on the left going to Player 1 and those on the right going to player 2. Suppose that Player 1 chooses his strategy (10, 20 or 30), first, and subsequently, and after observing Player 1’s choice, Player 2 chooses his own strategy (of 10, 20 or 30). Which of the following statements is true regarding this modified game? I. It is a simultaneous move game, because the timing of moves is irrelevant in classifying games.II. It is a sequential move game, because Player 2 observes Player 1’s choice before he chooses his own strategy.III. This modification gives Player 1 a ‘first mover advantage’. A) I and IIB) II and IIIC) I and IIID) I onlyE) II onlyarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning