EXPLORING ECON.-W/ACCESS (LL) >CUSTOM<
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781305757448
Author: Sexton
Publisher: CENGAGE C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 7P
To determine
(a)
To explain:
The change in the market of diamonds, if the new mine does not cooperate with the Central Selling Organization.
To determine
(b)
To explain:
The effect on the Central Selling Organization diamond advertising if the new mines outside the direct control of the Central Selling Organization want to sell their diamonds in the open market.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Q27
The Competition Bureau in Canada wants to increase competition and reduce monopoly power. Thus it it worries about industry concentration in Canada. Assume there is an oligopoly in Canada in the production of Computer Aided Design (CAD) machines which also has a cartel. Which of the following will make it easier for the Canadian cartel to operate effectively over time?
Multiple Choice
Demand for the CAD cartel's output becomes more elastic.
The number of substitutes for the CAD cartel's output increases.
get organized crime in involved in the production of CAD.
Each member firm of the CAD cartel observes the pricing and output decisions of other firms in the CAD cartel.
Demand for the CAD cartel's output decreases.
Price comparison services on the Internet (as well as “shopbots”) are a popular way for retailers to advertise their products and a convenient way for consumers to simultaneously obtain price quotes from several firms selling an identical product. Suppose that you are the manager of Digital Camera, Inc., a firm that specializes in selling digital cameras to consumers that advertises with an Internet price comparison service. In the market for one particular high-end camera, you have only one rival firm—The Camera Shop—with which you’ve competed for the last four years by setting prices day after day. Being savvy entrepreneurs, the ease of using the Internet to monitor rival firms’ prices has enabled you and your rival to charge extremely high prices for this particular camera. In a recent newspaper article, you read that The Camera Shop has exhausted its venture capital and that no new investors are willing to sink money into the company. As a result, The Camera Shop will discontinue…
The Gulf Cartel and Sinaloa Cartel are the two major cartels in illegal drug trade in Mexico. Although, each of these cartels are better off sharing the market, they have an incentive to try to take the entire market. In which of the following ways is cheating among these cartel members dealt with in this region?
Chapter 15 Solutions
EXPLORING ECON.-W/ACCESS (LL) >CUSTOM<
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Smyth Industries operated as a monopolist for the past several years, earning annual profits amounting to $50 million, which it could have maintained if Jones Incorporated did not enter the market. The result of this increased competition is lower prices and lower profits; Smyth Industries now earns $10 million annually. The managers of Smyth Industries are trying to devise a plan to drive Jones Incorporated out of the market so Smyth can regain its monopoly position (and profit). One of Smyth's managers suggests pricing its product 50 percent below marginal cost for exactly one year. The estimated impact of such a move is a loss of $1 billion. Ignoring antitrust concerns, compute the present value of Smyth Industries' profits if it could have remained a monopoly when the interest rate was 5 percent. Multiple Choice $210 million $200 million $1.05 billion $100 millionarrow_forwardIn the Tech industry, Tesla and Toyota are two famous brands and compete. Recently, both firms are competing to raise funds from the likes of Soft banks and Yes Bank. Tesla is in talks to raise $600 million and speed up its acquisition plans while Toyota plans to secure at least $200 million in a new funding round this year. Since both firms are going the same investors, if both approach the Soft banks then Toyota is guaranteed to raise $200 million while Tesla will receive $400 million. If both approach Yes Bank, then Toyota will definitely receive $600 million while Tesla will get $400 million. However, if Toyota approaches Yes Bank while Tesla pursues Soft bank, they are guaranteed investments worth $400 million and $800 million. On the other hand, if Toyota pursues Soft Bank while Tesla is interested in securing Yes bank’s funding, they each secure $600 million. a) Solve the Nash equilibrium for the above scenario as a simultaneous game. b) Now model the above scenario as a…arrow_forwardAssume the management of two large firms selling canned vegetables hold a secret meeting to create a collusive cartel. Which will most likely be the outcome of that meeting, assuming both companies engage in the collusion? soda output will fall and market prices will fall market price will remain unchanged and total output will fall soda output will fall and market prices will rise soda output will rise and market prices will fall soda output will rise and market prices will risearrow_forward
- Explain collusion as practiced most by oligopoly firms. Include in your answer and discussion of cartels and present-day examples of cartels. Kindly provide a detailed answer.arrow_forwardThere are two competing companies: Starbucks and Coffee Bean. Both companies want to determine whether they should launch a new advertising campaign for their coffee shops. If both companies start advertising, Starbucks will attract 4 new customers, while Coffee Bean will attract 3 new customers. However, if both companies decide not to advertise, Starbucks will attract only 3 new customers and 2 new customers for Coffee Bean. If only Starbucks decides to advertise, it will attract 5 new customers, while Coffee Bean will attract only 1 new customer for not advertising. While if only Coffee Bean decides to advertise, it will attract 5 new customers, and Starbucks will only attract 2 new customers for not advertising. What is the optimal strategy for Coffee Bean if Starbucks chooses to Advertise? Please explain in detail In relation to that, if Coffee Bean chooses to Advertise, the Payoff is __. In relation to that, if Coffee Bean chooses Not to Advertise, the Payoff is __. What is…arrow_forwardQ16 Suppose we are referring to OPEC, the oil cartel. Which would make it easier to maintain an effective collusive agreement among OPEC members? Multiple Choice the emergence of a number of potential entrant firms a decrease in the elasticity of demand for the OPEC's oil a new method of pricing that makes it more difficult for cartel members to determine the prices at which other cartel members are selling oil an increase in the number of substitutes for the oil produced by the OPEC cartel a pledge of allegiance to the cartelarrow_forward
- The U.K. Office of Fair Trading has recently unveiled a plan that will offer immunity from prosecution to firms who blow the whistle on their co-cartel conspirators. In the United States, this tactic has proven extremely successful: Since its introduction in 1993, the total amount of fines for anticompetitive behavior has increased twentyfold. Show how the tactic initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice, soon to be followed by the U.K. Office of Fair Trading, changes the rules of the game played between firms in a secret cartel.arrow_forwardLuLu Restaurant (LR) and Lucy Café (LC) have an implicit agreement to keep prices high so that both can earn $30,000 profit a year. Below is their complete payoff matrix in terms of thousands of dollars of profit per year and strategic actions a and b. LR’s payoffs are the left and LC’s are on the right. However, in 2014 new owner/managers have taken over both LR and LC and have to decide whether to abide by the implicit agreement or to cheat. LC a b LR a 30, 30 25,32 b 32, 25 26, 26 What strategy will each firm choose and what will be its profit? Is this a Nash equilibrium? Why or why not? Would it be worth it for these new owners/managers to find reach an accommodation and go back to the old implicit agreement? Would this be a Nash equilibrium? Why or why not? Is this game a prisoner’s dilemma? Why or why not?arrow_forwardFor each of the following, indicate whether the statement is True, False, or Uncertain, and explain your answer. (No credit will be given without an explanation.) In the Stackelberg model of duopoly, it is better to be the follower than the leader since the follower gets to observe the leader’s behavior.arrow_forward
- One of the most famous cartels of the past 50 years is OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. The members of OPEC are countries rather than individual businesses. Oil Ministers from each of the countries meet regularly to establish how much each oil each country will produce each month (the amount each country agrees to produce is called its quota). Saudi Arabia is the largest oil-producing country in OPEC. Why does Saudi Arabia usually produce less than its quota each month?arrow_forwardIn order to be successful, a cartel must find a way to encourage members to produce more than they would otherwise produce. agree on the total level of production for the cartel, but they need not agree on the amount produced by each member. agree on the total level of production and on the amount produced by each member. agree on the prices charged by each member, but they need not agree on amounts produced.arrow_forwardOne significant difference between oligopoly and monopolistic competition is that advertising is only noted in monopolistic competition becausearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning